- Deflationary Methodology and Rationality of Science.Thomas Nickles - 1996 - Philosophica 58 (2).details
|
|
Feminist Philosophy of Science.Lynn Hankinson Nelson - 2002 - In Peter Machamer & Michael Silberstein (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Science. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 312–331.details
|
|
Bias and Conditioning in Sequential medical trials.Cecilia Nardini & Jan Sprenger - 2013 - Philosophy of Science 80 (5):1053-1064.details
|
|
Saving epistemology from the epistemologists: recent work in the theory of knowledge.Adam Morton - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):685-704.details
|
|
Evidential holism.Joe Morrison - 2017 - Philosophy Compass 12 (6):e12417.details
|
|
Historical Inductions: New Cherries, Same Old Cherry-picking.Moti Mizrahi - 2015 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 29 (2):129-148.details
|
|
In Pursuit of Resistance: Pragmatic Recommendations for Doing Science within One’s Means. [REVIEW]Amy McLaughlin - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 1 (3):353-371.details
|
|
Demonstration by simulation: The philosophical significance of experiment in helmholtz's theory of perception.Patrick Joseph McDonald - 2003 - Perspectives on Science 11 (2):170-207.details
|
|
The error statistical philosopher as normative naturalist.Deborah Mayo & Jean Miller - 2008 - Synthese 163 (3):305 - 314.details
|
|
Severe tests, arguing from error, and methodological underdetermination.Deborah G. Mayo - 1997 - Philosophical Studies 86 (3):243-266.details
|
|
Significance Tests: Vitiated or Vindicated by the Replication Crisis in Psychology?Deborah G. Mayo - 2020 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 12 (1):101-120.details
|
|
Statistical significance and its critics: practicing damaging science, or damaging scientific practice?Deborah G. Mayo & David Hand - 2022 - Synthese 200 (3):1-33.details
|
|
Severe testing as a basic concept in a neyman–pearson philosophy of induction.Deborah G. Mayo & Aris Spanos - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (2):323-357.details
|
|
Some methodological issues in experimental economics.Deborah Mayo - 2008 - Philosophy of Science 75 (5):633-645.details
|
|
Response to Howson and Laudan.Deborah G. Mayo - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (2):323-333.details
|
|
Philosophical Scrutiny of Evidence of Risks: From Bioethics to Bioevidence.Deborah G. Mayo & Aris Spanos - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (5):803-816.details
|
|
Novel work on problems of novelty? Comments on Hudson.Deborah G. Mayo - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (1):131-134.details
|
|
Ockham Efficiency Theorem for Stochastic Empirical Methods.Kevin T. Kelly & Conor Mayo-Wilson - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (6):679-712.details
|
|
How to discount double-counting when it counts: Some clarifications.Deborah G. Mayo - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (4):857-879.details
|
|
Experimental practice and an error statistical account of evidence.Deborah G. Mayo - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):207.details
|
|
Ducks, Rabbits, and Normal Science: Recasting the Kuhn’s-Eye View of Popper’s Demarcation of Science.Deborah G. Mayo - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (2):271-290.details
|
|
From data to phenomena: a Kantian stance.Michela Massimi - 2011 - Synthese 182 (1):101-116.details
|
|
Horizon for Scientific Practice: Scientific Discovery and Progress.James A. Marcum - 2010 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (2):187-215.details
|
|
Experimental Validity and Pragmatic Modes in Empirical Science.Maria Caamaño Alegre - 2009 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23 (1):19-45.details
|
|
Experimental Series and the Justification of Temin’s DNA Provirus Hypothesis.James A. Marcum - 2007 - Synthese 154 (2):259 - 292.details
|
|
Experimental Series and the Justification of Temin’s DNA Provirus Hypothesis.James A. Marcum - 2007 - Synthese 154 (2):259-292.details
|
|
Evolutionary Philosophy of Science: A New Image of Science and Stance towards General Philosophy of Science.James A. Marcum - 2017 - Philosophies 2 (4):25.details
|
|
A mistaken confidence in data.Edouard Machery - 2021 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (2):1-17.details
|
|
Base empírica global de contrastación, base empírica local de contrastación y aserción empírica de una teoría.Pablo Lorenzano - 2012 - Agora 31 (2):71-107.details
|
|
Evidential diversity and premise probability in young children's inductive judgment.Yafen Lo, Ashley Sides, Joseph Rozelle & Daniel Osherson - 2002 - Cognitive Science 26 (2):181-206.details
|
|
Counting experiments.Jonathan Livengood - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (1):175-195.details
|
|
Inference to the Best explanation.Peter Lipton - 2004 - In Martin Curd & Stathis Psillos (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science. Routledge. pp. 193.details
|
|
What distinguishes data from models?Sabina Leonelli - 2019 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 9 (2):22.details
|
|
What distinguishes data from models?Sabina Leonelli - 2019 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 9 (2):22.details
|
|
Interpretive praxis and theory‐networks.Sangwon Lee - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (2):213-230.details
|
|
The role of basic science in evidence-based medicine.Adam La Caze - 2011 - Biology and Philosophy 26 (1):81-98.details
|
|
Model change and reliability in scientific inference.Erich Kummerfeld & David Danks - 2014 - Synthese 191 (12):2673-2693.details
|
|
Neyman-Pearson Hypothesis Testing, Epistemic Reliability and Pragmatic Value-Laden Asymmetric Error Risks.Adam P. Kubiak, Paweł Kawalec & Adam Kiersztyn - 2022 - Axiomathes 32 (4):585-604.details
|
|
Comparativist Philosophy of Science and Population Viability Assessment in Biology: Helping Resolve Scientific Controversy.Kristin Shrader-Frechette - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (5):817-828.details
|
|
Was regression to the mean really the solution to Darwin’s problem with heredity?: Essay Review of Stigler, Stephen M. 2016. The Seven Pillars of Statistical Wisdom. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. [REVIEW]Adam Krashniak & Ehud Lamm - 2017 - Biology and Philosophy (5):1-10.details
|
|
The Anti-Metaphysical Argument Against Scientific Realism: A Minimally Metaphysical Response.Raphaël Künstler - 2021 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 52 (4):577-595.details
|
|
Taking philosophy of science to economics: Marcel Boumans: Science outside the laboratory: Measurement in field sciences and economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, 216pp, $ 59.95 HB; Peter Spiegler: Behind the model: A constructive critique of economic modeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015, 230pp, $ 34.99 PB.Harold Kincaid - 2016 - Metascience 26 (1):67-70.details
|
|
Herbert Simon, innovation, and heuristics.Reza Kheirandish & Shabnam Mousavi - 2018 - Mind and Society 17 (1-2):97-109.details
|
|
An inferentialist theory of causation: Julian Reiss: Causation, evidence, and inference. New York: Routledge, 2015, 258pp, $145.00 HB. [REVIEW]Jeff Kasser - 2016 - Metascience 25 (3):447-450.details
|
|
Lessons from the Large Hadron Collider for model-based experimentation: the concept of a model of data acquisition and the scope of the hierarchy of models.Koray Karaca - 2018 - Synthese 195 (12):1-22.details
|
|
Contrastive knowledge.Antti Karjalainen & Adam Morton - 2003 - Philosophical Explorations 6 (2):74 – 89.details
|
|
Error and inference: Recent exchanges on experimental reasoning, reliability, and the objectivity and rationality of science * edited by Deborah G. Mayo and Aris Spanos. [REVIEW]N. Jones - 2011 - Analysis 71 (2):406-408.details
|
|
What is a Beautiful Experiment?Milena Ivanova - 2022 - Erkenntnis 88 (8):3419-3437.details
|
|
The Problem of New Evidence: P-Hacking and Pre-Analysis Plans.Zoe Hitzig & Jacob Stegenga - 2020 - Diametros 17 (66):10-33.details
|
|
Prediction versus accommodation and the risk of overfitting.Christopher Hitchcock & Elliott Sober - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (1):1-34.details
|
|