- Critical Rationalism: An Epistemological Critique.Masoud Mohammadi Alamuti - 2023 - Foundations of Science 28 (3):809-840.details
|
|
Logical Maximalism in the Empirical Sciences.Constantin C. Brîncuș - 2021 - In Parusniková Zuzana & Merritt David (eds.), Karl Popper's Science and Philosophy. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. pp. 171-184.details
|
|
Another Look at the Modal Collapse Argument.Omar Fakhri - 2021 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 13 (1):1-23.details
|
|
Reviving Frequentism.Mario Hubert - 2021 - Synthese 199:5255–5584.details
|
|
Truth, rationality, and the situation.Mark A. Notturno - 1998 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28 (3):400-421.details
|
|
Recognizing Argument Types and Adding Missing Reasons.Christoph Lumer - 2019 - In Bart J. Garssen, David Godden, Gordon Mitchell & Jean Wagemans (eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA). [Amsterdam, July 3-6, 2018.]. Sic Sat. pp. 769-777.details
|
|
The Ethical Nature of Karl Popper’s Solution to the Problem of Rationality.Stefano Gattei - 2002 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (2):240-266.details
|
|
The Heterodox 'Fourth Paradigm' of Libertarianism: an Abstract Eleutherology plus Critical Rationalism.J. C. Lester - 2019 - Journal of Libertarian Studies 23:91-116.details
|
|
Abortion and Infanticide: a Radical Libertarian Defence.J. C. Lester - 2021 - In Charles Tandy (ed.), Death And Anti-Death, Volume 19: One Year After Judith Jarvis Thomson (1929-2020). Ann Arbor, MI: Ria University Press. pp. 139-152.details
|
|
(1 other version)The Necessity of Exosomatic Knowledge for Civilization and a Revision to our Epistemology.Ray Scott Percival - 2012 - In Norbert-Bertrand Barbe (ed.), LE NÉANT DANS LA PENSÉE CONTEMPORAINE. Publications du Centre Fran. pp. 136-150.details
|
|
Can free evidence be bad? Value of informationfor the imprecise probabilist.Seamus Bradley & Katie Steele - 2016 - Philosophy of Science 83 (1):1-28.details
|
|
(1 other version)Propensities and probabilities.Nuel Belnap - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38 (3):593-625.details
|
|
Confirmation versus Falsificationism.Ray Scott Percival - 2015 - In Robin L. Cautin & Scott O. Lilienfeld (eds.), The Encyclopedia of Clinical Psychology. Wiley-Blackwell.details
|
|
Rationality, Reasonableness, and Critical Rationalism: Problems with the Pragma-dialectical View. [REVIEW]Harvey Siegel & John Biro - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (2):191-203.details
|
|
Verisimilitude: a causal approach.Robert Northcott - 2013 - Synthese 190 (9):1471-1488.details
|
|
(1 other version)Book Review: Catton, P., & Macdonald, G. (Eds.). (2004). Karl Popper: Critical appraisals. London: Routledge. Pp. xii + 235. [REVIEW]Gunnar Andersson - 2009 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (1):115-119.details
|
|
Entropy - A Guide for the Perplexed.Roman Frigg & Charlotte Werndl - 2011 - In Claus Beisbart & Stephan Hartmann (eds.), Probabilities in Physics. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 115-142.details
|
|
Evolutionary Epistemology and the Aim of Science.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (2):209-225.details
|
|
Why advocate pancritical rationalism?Darrell Patrick Rowbottom & Otávio Bueno - 2009 - In R. S. Cohen & Z. Parusniková (eds.), Rethinking Popper, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Springer. pp. 81--89.details
|
|
Karl Popper.Stephen Thornton - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.details
|
|
The reference class problem is your problem too.Alan Hájek - 2007 - Synthese 156 (3):563--585.details
|
|
Falsification of Propensity Models by Statistical Tests and the Goodness-of-Fit Paradox.Christian Hennig - 2007 - Philosophia Mathematica 15 (2):166-192.details
|
|
A Refined Propensity Account for GRW Theory.Lorenzo Lorenzetti - 2021 - Foundations of Physics 51 (2):1-20.details
|
|
Probabilities, Causes and Propensities in Physics.Mauricio Suárez - 2010 - In Mauricio Suárez (ed.), Probabilities, Causes and Propensities in Physics. New York: Springer.details
|
|
Immigration and Libertarianism: Open Borders versus Directionalism.J. C. Lester - 2021 - MEST Journal 9 (2).details
|
|
A Critical Assessment of the Programmes of Producing ‘Islamic Science’ and ‘Islamisation of Science/Knowledge’.Ali Paya - 2015 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 29 (3):311-335.details
|
|
The Propensity Interpretation of Probability: A Re-evaluation.Joseph Berkovitz - 2015 - Erkenntnis 80 (S3):629-711.details
|
|
(1 other version)The burden of criticism.Jan van Laar & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (2):201-224.details
|
|
Pornography Stumps Analytic Philosophers of Art.Ian Jarvie - 2015 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 45 (1):122-140.details
|
|
A Normative Theory of Argument Strength.Ulrike Hahn & Mike Oaksford - 2006 - Informal Logic 26 (1):1-24.details
|
|
The Burden of Criticism: Consequences of Taking a Critical Stance.Jan Albert Laar & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (2):201-224.details
|
|
Argumentative approach to "framing": framing, deliberation and action in an environmental conflict.Isabela Fairclough & Irina Diana Madroane - 2020 - Co-herencia 17 (32):119-158.details
|
|
Some considerations on conditional chances.Paul Humphreys - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (4):667-680.details
|
|
(1 other version)No Dilemma for Pancritical Rationalism: In Response to Hauptli.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom - 2009 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (3):490-494.details
|
|
(1 other version)Book Review: Catton, P., & Macdonald, G. (Eds.). (2004). Karl Popper: Critical appraisals. London: Routledge. Pp. xii + 235. [REVIEW]Gunnar Andersson - 2009 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (1):115-119.details
|
|
A pragma-dialectical response to objectivist epistemic challenges.Bart Garssen & Jan Albert van Laar - 2010 - Informal Logic 30 (2):122-141.details
|
|
A justification for Popper's non-justificationism.Chi-Ming Lam - 2007 - Diametros 12:1-24.details
|
|
On Critical and Pancritical Rationalism.Antoni Diller - 2013 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (2):127-156.details
|
|
Favoring, Likelihoodism, and Bayesianism. [REVIEW]Branden Fitelson - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (3):666-672.details
|
|
Rethinking Popper.Zuzana Parusniková & Robert S. Cohen (eds.) - 2009 - London: Springer.details
|
|
Abstract Society in the Time of Plague.Adam Chmielewski - 2020 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 50 (4):366-380.details
|
|
(1 other version)Evaluating policy as argument: the public debate over the first UK austerity budget.Isabela Fairclough - 2016 - Critical Discourse Studies 13 (1):57-77.details
|
|
On Probabilities in Biology and Physics.Joseph Berkovitz & Philippe Huneman - 2015 - Erkenntnis 80 (S3):433-456.details
|
|
A Critical Engagement of Bostrom’s Computer Simulation Hypothesis.Norman Swazo - unknowndetails
|
|
Do we reason when we when we think we reason of think? [Spanish].David Miller - 2007 - Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 7:88-108.details
|
|
Why the Objectivist Interpretation of Falsification Matters.Miloš Taliga - 2016 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 46 (4):335-351.details
|
|
The Devaluation of the Subject in Popper’s Theory of World 3.Zuzana Parusniková - 2016 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 46 (3):304-317.details
|
|
The empirical stance vs. the critical attitude.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom - 2005 - South African Journal of Philosophy 24 (3):200-223.details
|
|
Fitness and Propensity’s Annulment?Marshall Abrams - 2007 - Biology and Philosophy 22 (1):115-130.details
|
|
Is analytic philosophy the cure for film theory?Ian Jarvie - 1999 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29 (3):416-440.details
|
|