- Rescuing ?Begging the question?J. I. Biro - 1977 - Metaphilosophy 8 (4):257-271.details
|
|
The Rhetorical Theory of Argument is Self-Defeating.Scott F. Aikin - 2011 - Cogency: Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation 3 (1).details
|
|
On Logic in the Law: "Something, but not All".Susan Haack - 2007 - Ratio Juris 20 (1):1-31.details
|
|
Philosophy in schools.George MacDonald Ross - 1988 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 22 (2):207–219.details
|
|
BankXX: Supporting legal arguments through heuristic retrieval. [REVIEW]Edwina L. Rissland, David B. Skalak & M. Timur Friedman - 1996 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (1):1-71.details
|
|
An exercise in formalising teleological case-based reasoning.Henry Prakken - 2002 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 10 (1-3):113-133.details
|
|
Dialectical models in artificial intelligence and law.Jaap Hage - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):137-172.details
|
|
Bootstrapping and Persuasive Argumentation.Guido Melchior - forthcoming - Argumentation.details
|
|
Is Every Definition Persuasive?Jakub Pruś & Andrew Aberdein - 2022 - Informal Logic 42 (1):25-47.details
|
|
Dialogue Types, Argumentation Schemes, and Mathematical Practice: Douglas Walton and Mathematics.Andrew Aberdein - 2021 - Journal of Applied Logics 8 (1):159-182.details
|
|
Affecting Argumentative Action: The Temporality of Decisive Emotion.Prins Marcus Valiant Lantz - 2021 - Argumentation 35 (4):603-627.details
|
|
How Can Modifications of Meaning Influence Argumentation? The Concept and Typology of Semantic Arguments.Jakub Pruś - 2020 - Argumentation 35 (3):483-508.details
|
|
Informal Logic: A 'Canadian' Approach to Argument.Federico Puppo (ed.) - 2019 - Windsor, Canada: Windsor Studies in Argumentation.details
|
|
Recognizing Argument Types and Adding Missing Reasons.Christoph Lumer - 2019 - In Bart J. Garssen, David Godden, Gordon Mitchell & Jean Wagemans (eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA). [Amsterdam, July 3-6, 2018.]. Sic Sat. pp. 769-777.details
|
|
The study of metaphor as part of critical discourse analysis.Andreas Musolff - 2012 - Critical Discourse Studies 9 (3):301-310.details
|
|
Ontological representations of rhetorical figures for argument mining.Jelena Mitrović, Cliff O’Reilly, Miljana Mladenović & Siegfried Handschuh - 2017 - Argument and Computation 8 (3):267-287.details
|
|
Validations of proofs considered as texts: Can undergraduates tell whether an argument proves a theorem?Annie Selden - 2003 - Journal for Mathematics Education Research 34 (1):4-36.details
|
|
Multiple Audiences as Text Stakeholders: A Conceptual Framework for Analyzing Complex Rhetorical Situations.Rudi Palmieri & Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (4):467-499.details
|
|
Why Simpler Arguments are Better.Moti Mizrahi - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (3):247-261.details
|
|
Rhetoric, dialectic and logic: The triad de-compartmentalized.Charlotte Jørgensen - unknowndetails
|
|
Types of Dialogue, Dialectical Relevance and Textual Congruity.Douglas Walton & Fabrizio Macagno - 2007 - Anthropology and Philosophy 8 (1-2):101-120.details
|
|
Rhetorical Humanism vs. Object-Oriented Ontology: The Ethics of Archimedean Points and Levers.Ira Allen - 2014 - Substance 43 (3):67-87.details
|
|
Feminist Perspectives on Argumentation.Catherine E. Hundleby - 2021 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.details
|
|
The Irrelevance of Contemporary Academic Philosophy for Law: Recovering the Rhetorical Tradition.Francis J. Mootz - unknowndetails
|
|
What’s So Funny About Arguing with God? A Case for Playful Argumentation from Jewish Literature.Don Waisanen, Hershey H. Friedman & Linda Weiser Friedman - 2015 - Argumentation 29 (1):57-80.details
|
|
Baseballs and arguments from fairness.Douglas Walton - 2014 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 22 (4):423-449.details
|
|
Can Perelman’s NR be Viewed as an Ethics of Discourse?Roselyne Koren - 2009 - Argumentation 23 (3):421-431.details
|
|
The Value of Topoi.J. P. Zompetti - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (1):15-28.details
|
|
What Does an Argument Culture Look Like?David Zarefsky - 2009 - Informal Logic 29 (3):296-308.details
|
|
The Dialectic of Second-Order Distinctions: The Structure of Arguments about Fallacies.David Goodwin - 1992 - Informal Logic 14 (1).details
|
|
Interpreting Perelman’s Universal Audience: Gross vs. Crosswhite. [REVIEW]Charlotte Jørgensen - 2007 - Argumentation 23 (1):11-19.details
|
|
Perelman, ad Hominem Argument, and Rhetorical Ethos.Michael Leff - 2009 - Argumentation 23 (3):301-311.details
|
|
Perelman’s Audience Revisted: Towards the Construction of a New Type of Audience. [REVIEW]Galia Yanoshevsky - 2009 - Argumentation 23 (3):409-419.details
|
|
The Rhetoric of Evolutionary Theory.David J. Depew - 2013 - Biological Theory 7 (4):380-389.details
|
|
Reasoning, robots, and navigation: Dual roles for deductive and abductive reasoning.Janet Wiles - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):92-92.details
|
|
Revelation and Rhetoric: A Critical Model of Forensic Discourse. [REVIEW]Chris Heffer - 2013 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 26 (2):459-485.details
|
|
Strategies of Visual Argumentation in Slideshow Presentations: The Role of the Visuals in an Al Gore Presentation on Climate Change. [REVIEW]Jens E. Kjeldsen - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (4):425-443.details
|
|
A history of AI and Law in 50 papers: 25 years of the international conference on AI and Law. [REVIEW]Trevor Bench-Capon, Michał Araszkiewicz, Kevin Ashley, Katie Atkinson, Floris Bex, Filipe Borges, Daniele Bourcier, Paul Bourgine, Jack G. Conrad, Enrico Francesconi, Thomas F. Gordon, Guido Governatori, Jochen L. Leidner, David D. Lewis, Ronald P. Loui, L. Thorne McCarty, Henry Prakken, Frank Schilder, Erich Schweighofer, Paul Thompson, Alex Tyrrell, Bart Verheij, Douglas N. Walton & Adam Z. Wyner - 2012 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 20 (3):215-319.details
|
|
On Some Aristotelian Sources of Modern Argumentation Theory.Christof Rapp & Tim Wagner - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (1):7-30.details
|
|
In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialectics.Frans H. Eemeren - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (1):49-70.details
|
|
Presumptions in Legal Argumentation.Fabrizio Macagno & Douglas Walton - 2012 - Ratio Juris 25 (3):271-300.details
|
|
Argument from Analogy in Law, the Classical Tradition, and Recent Theories.Fabrizio Macagno & Douglas Walton - 2009 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 42 (2):154-182.details
|
|
Editors' introduction.Henry Prakken & Giovanni Sartor - 1996 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (3-4):157-161.details
|
|
Methodological invention as a constructive project: Exploring the production of ethical knowledge through the interaction of discursive logics.Elizabeth M. Bucar - 2008 - Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (3):355-373.details
|
|
Rhetorical Citizenship and the Science of Science Communication.Jeanne Fahnestock - 2020 - Argumentation 34 (3):371-387.details
|
|
Controlling the discourse: interviews with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.Jason Jones - 2010 - Critical Discourse Studies 7 (2):127-141.details
|
|
Discovering Argumentative Patterns in Energy Polylogues: A Macroscope for Argument Mining.Elena Musi & Mark Aakhus - 2018 - Argumentation 32 (3):397-430.details
|
|
Artificial Intelligence as a Means to Moral Enhancement.Michał Klincewicz - 2016 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 48 (1):171-187.details
|
|
Truth, Trust, and Telepresence.Paula S. Tompkins - 2003 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 18 (3-4):194-212.details
|
|
Reason as a Nexus of Natural Law and Rhetoric.Jeffrey J. Maciejewski - 2005 - Journal of Business Ethics 59 (3):247-257.details
|
|