- Feminism, Argumentation and Coalescence.Michael A. Gilbert - 1994 - Informal Logic 16 (2).details
|
|
Coalescent argumentation.Michael A. Gilbert - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (5):837-852.details
|
|
Philosophy and Rhetoric: An Abbreviated History of an Evolving Identity.Gerard A. Hauser - 2007 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 40 (1):1 - 14.details
|
|
Table of the Different Relations Observed in Chemistry between Different Substances 27 August 1718.Etienne-François Geoffroy - 1996 - Science in Context 9 (3):313-320.details
|
|
Evidence, Emotion and Eminence: A Qualitative and Evaluative Analysis of Doctors’ Skills in Macroallocation.Siun Gallagher, Miles Little & Claire Hooker - 2019 - Health Care Analysis 27 (2):93-109.details
|
|
Is the Enthymeme a Syllogism?James Fredal - 2018 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 51 (1):24-49.details
|
|
Argument Strength, the Toulmin Model, and Ampliative Probability.James B. Freeman - 2006 - Informal Logic 26 (1):25-40.details
|
|
The Origins of and Possible Futures for Chaïm Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca's Dissociation of Concepts.David A. Frank - 2020 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 53 (4):385-399.details
|
|
Varieties of rhetoric in science.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 1990 - History of the Human Sciences 3 (2):177-193.details
|
|
The Argument Form "Appeal to Galileo": A Critical Appreciation of Doury’s Account.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 2015 - Informal Logic 35 (3):221-272.details
|
|
Eugene Garver, For the Sake of Argument: Practical Reasoning, Character, and the Ethics of Belief: University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2004, Xi + 272 pp. [REVIEW]Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 2009 - Argumentation 23 (1):109-114.details
|
|
Verbal Signatures of Dissociation: Epitomizing and Limiting Cases.Jeanne Fahnestock - 2020 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 53 (4):417-432.details
|
|
Rhetorical Citizenship and the Science of Science Communication.Jeanne Fahnestock - 2020 - Argumentation 34 (3):371-387.details
|
|
Arguing in Different Forums: The Bering Crossover Controversy.Jeanne Fahnestock - 1989 - Science, Technology and Human Values 14 (1):26-42.details
|
|
Presumptions in Legal Argumentation.Douglas Walton Fabrizio Macagno - 2012 - Ratio Juris 25 (3):271-300.details
|
|
Argument from Analogy in Law, the Classical Tradition, and Recent Theories.Fabrizio Macagno & Douglas Walton - 2009 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 42 (2):154-182.details
|
|
Metaphor, ignorance and the sentiment of (ir)rationality.Francesca Ervas - 2021 - Synthese.details
|
|
Creative Argumentation: When and Why People Commit the Metaphoric Fallacy.Francesca Ervas, Antonio Ledda, Amitash Ojha, Giuseppe Antonio Pierro & Bipin Indurkhya - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.details
|
|
Moral argumentation as a rhetorical practice in popular online discourse: Examples from online comment sections of celebrity gossip.Maria Eronen - 2014 - Discourse and Communication 8 (3):278-298.details
|
|
Socrates questions Gorgias: The rhetorical vector of Plato's ?Gorgias? [REVIEW]Richard Leo Enos - 1991 - Argumentation 5 (1):5-15.details
|
|
In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialectics.Frans H. Eemeren - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (1):49-70.details
|
|
Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory.Frans Hendrik van Eemeren & Bart Garssen (eds.) - 2015 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer.details
|
|
Reflection in Scientific Activity and Hierarchical Model of Argumentation.Mary Dziśko & Andrew Schumann - 2008 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 13 (26).details
|
|
Copenhagen failure : a rhetorical treatise of how speeches unite and divide mankind.Teea Kortetmäki - unknowndetails
|
|
Основные идеи и концептуальные предпосылки доксологии Матса Розенгрена.Dmitrii Vorobev - 2018 - Философия И Культура 11:38-58.details
|
|
Economic Reasoning and Fallacy of Composition: Pursuing a Woods-Walton Thesis.A. Finocchiaro Maurice - unknowndetails
|
|
When win-argument pedagogy is a loss for the composition classroom.Grosskopf Wendy Lee - 2015 - Argument: Biannual Philosophical Journal 5 (1):243-266.details
|
|
Validations of proofs considered as texts: Can undergraduates tell whether an argument proves a theorem?Annie Selden - 2003 - Journal for Mathematics Education Research 34 (1):4-36.details
|
|
Questões conceituais de ética em educação // Questions about the concept of ethics in education.Maria Judith Sucupira da Costa Lins - 2013 - Conjectura: Filosofia E Educação 18 (2):91-106.details
|
|
Cognitive communities and argument communities.Manfred Kraus & David Zarefsky - unknowndetails
|
|
Dialogue Types, Argumentation Schemes, and Mathematical Practice: Douglas Walton and Mathematics.Andrew Aberdein - 2021 - Journal of Applied Logics 8 (1):159-182.details
|
|
Raising the tone: Definition, bullshit, and the definition of bullshit.Andrew Aberdein - 2006 - In G. Reisch & G. Hardcastle (eds.), Bullshit and Philosophy. Open Court. pp. 151-169.details
|
|
Recognizing Argument Types and Adding Missing Reasons.Christoph Lumer - 2019 - In Bart J. Garssen, David Godden, Gordon Mitchell & Jean Wagemans (eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA). [Amsterdam, July 3-6, 2018.]. Amsterdam (Netherlands): pp. 769-777.details
|
|
Visual and Verbal color: chaos or cognitive and cultural fugue? .Mony Almalech - 2019 - In Evangelos Kourdis, Maria Papadopoulou & Loukia Kostopoulou (eds.), The Fugue of the Five Senses and the Semiotics of the Shifting Sensorium: Selected Proceedings from the 11th International Conference of the Hellenic Semiotics Society.details
|
|
Improving Practical Reasoning and Argumentation.Michael D. Baumtrog - 2015 - Dissertation, Universidade Nova de Lisboadetails
|
|
Types of Warrant in Practical Reasoning.Christian Kock - unknowndetails
|
|
Commentary on Mohammed.Hans V. Hansen - unknowndetails
|
|
Revisiting Aristotle’s Topoi.Christopher W. Tindale - unknowndetails
|
|
Moral disagreements and pernicious pragmatism: Pluralism, value argumentation, and the U.S. health care debate.John Rief, Matthew Paul Brigham & Bill Balthrop - unknowndetails
|
|
The Rule of Similarity as Intercultural Basis of Defeasible Argumentation.Michael Hoppmann - unknowndetails
|
|
Correlation and causality.Michael Hoppmann & Robert H. Ennis - unknowndetails
|
|
Radical Interpretation of Metaphor in Rhetorical Discourse: A pragmatic account.Joe Wofford - unknowndetails
|
|
Dialectical Profiles and Indicators of Argumentative Moves.Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser & A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans - unknowndetails
|
|
Commentary on Blair.James B. Freeman - unknowndetails
|
|
Rationality, reasonableness and informal logic: A case study of Chaim Perelman.Rongdong Jin & Christopher W. Tindale - unknowndetails
|
|
Consensus, Dissensus, and a Third Way, Learned Ignorance.Dale Hample - unknowndetails
|
|
Types of Dialogue, Dialectical Relevance and Textual Congruity.Douglas Walton & Fabrizio Macagno - 2007 - Anthropology and Philosophy 8 (1-2):101-120.details
|
|
Khôra, invention, deconstruction and the space of complete surprise.Michael C. Souders - unknowndetails
|
|
Shifting focus from the universal audience to the common good.George Boger & Rongdong Jin - unknowndetails
|
|
Argumentative reasoning patterns.Douglas Walton & Fabrizio Macagno - 2006 - In Douglas Walton & Fabrizio Macagno (eds.), Proceedings of 6th CMNA (Computational Models of Natural Argument) Workshop, ECAI-European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. University of Trento. pp. 48-51.details
|
|