- Conference to Commemorate the 1893 World's Parliament of Religions, February 21-22.Cornelis de Waal, Avik Mukherjee, Ewoud Halewijn, Pangratios Papacosta, Suyan Budhoo, Roger Adams & Elizabeth Hartman - unknowndetails
|
|
(1 other version)Can’t philosophers tell the difference between science and religion?: Demarcation revisited.Robert T. Pennock - 2011 - Synthese 178 (2):177-206.details
|
|
Bilim İnsanlarının Perspektifinden Sınırlandırma Problemi.M. Efe Ateş - 2023 - Felsefe Arkivi (59):56-77.details
|
|
Vice Epistemology of Believers in Pseudoscience.Filip Tvrdý - 2021 - Filozofia 76 (10):735-751.details
|
|
Demarcation without Dogmas.Ilmari Hirvonen & Janne Karisto - 2022 - Theoria 88 (3):701-720.details
|
|
Five Pragmatist Insights on Scientific Expertise.Mathias Girel - 2020 - Philosophical Inquiries 8 (2):151-176.details
|
|
Věda, pseudověda a paravěda.Filip Tvrdý - 2020 - E-Logos 27 (2):4-17.details
|
|
Discovery and Instrumentation: How Surplus Knowledge Contributes to Progress in Science.George Borg - 2019 - Perspectives on Science 27 (6):861-890.details
|
|
An Analysis of the Demarcation Problem in Philosophy of Science and Its Application to Homeopathy.Alper Bilgehan Yardımcı - 2018 - Flsf 1 (25):91-107.details
|
|
The Multicriterial Approach to the Problem of Demarcation.Damian Fernandez-Beanato - 2020 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 51 (3):375-390.details
|
|
Science, politics and regulation: The trust-based approach to the demarcation problem.Stephen John - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 90 (C):1-9.details
|
|
Scientific/Intellectual Movements Remedying Epistemic Injustice: The Case of Indigenous Studies.Inkeri Koskinen & Kristina Rolin - 2019 - Philosophy of Science 86 (5):1052-1063.details
|
|
Neuroethics 1995–2012. A Bibliometric Analysis of the Guiding Themes of an Emerging Research Field.Jon Leefmann, Clement Levallois & Elisabeth Hildt - 2016 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 10:167162.details
|
|
Distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate roles for values in transdisciplinary research.Inkeri Koskinen & Kristina Rolin - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 91 (C):191-198.details
|
|
Practical‐Political Jurisprudence and the Dual Nature of Law.Sarah Nason - 2013 - Ratio Juris 26 (3):430-455.details
|
|
Science, Values, and the New Demarcation Problem.David B. Resnik & Kevin C. Elliott - 2023 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 54 (2):259-286.details
|
|
Is the precautionary principle unscientific?David B. Resnik - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 34 (2):329-344.details
|
|
A Trilemma for the Singularitarian.Melvin Chen - 2023 - Philosophy and Technology 36 (3):1-23.details
|
|
(1 other version)Can’t philosophers tell the difference between science and religion?: Demarcation revisited.Robert T. Pennock - 2011 - Synthese 178 (2):177-206.details
|
|
Astrology Pseudoscience and a Discussion About Its Threats to Society.Tevfik Uyar - 2016 - Journal of Higher Education and Science 6:1.details
|
|
(1 other version)Is Ethical Expertise Possible?Jukka Varelius - 2008 - Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 11 (2):127-132.details
|
|
(1 other version)Is ethical expertise possible?Jukka Varelius - 2008 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11 (2):127-132.details
|
|
Speciesism, Arbitrariness and Moral Illusions.Stijn Bruers - 2020 - Philosophia 49 (3):957-975.details
|
|