- Genetically Modified Crops, Inclusion, and Democracy.Daniel J. Hicks - 2017 - Perspectives on Science 25 (4):488-520.details
|
|
Public Misunderstanding of Science? Reframing the Problem of Vaccine Hesitancy.Maya J. Goldenberg - 2016 - Perspectives on Science 24 (5):552-581.details
|
|
World Risk Society as Cosmopolitan Society?Ulrich Beck - 1996 - Theory, Culture and Society 13 (4):1-32.details
|
|
Erratum to: The ethics of 'public understanding of ethics'—why and how bioethics expertise should include public and patients' voices.Silke Schicktanz, Mark Schweda & Brian Wynne - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (2):251-251.details
|
|
Is There Room at the Bottom for CSR? Corporate Social Responsibility and Nanotechnology in the UK.Chris Groves, Lori Frater, Robert Lee & Elen Stokes - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 101 (4):525-552.details
|
|
Integrating Multiple Knowledge Systems into Environmental Decision-making: Two Case Studies of Participatory Biodiversity Initiatives in Canada and their Implications for Conceptions of Education and Public Involvement.Elin Kelsey - 2003 - Environmental Values 12 (3):381-396.details
|
|
Valuing Values: Better Public Engagement on Nanotechnology Demands a Better Understanding of the Diversity of Publics.Craig Cormick & Simon Hunter - 2014 - NanoEthics 8 (1):57-71.details
|
|
Re-politicising Philosophy of Science: A Continuing Challenge for Social Epistemology.Kei Yoshida - 2012 - Social Epistemology 26 (3-4):365-378.details
|
|
Assumptions of the Deficit Model Type of Thinking: Ignorance, Attitudes, and Science Communication in the Debate on Genetic Engineering in Agriculture. [REVIEW]Marko Ahteensuu - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (3):295-313.details
|
|
Handservant of Technocracy.Christian Ross - 2022 - Spontaneous Generations 10 (1):63-87.details
|
|
The Cultural Negotiation of Publics–Science Relations: Effects of Idaho Residents’ Orientation Toward Science on Support for K-12 STEM Education.Debbie A. Storrs, Traci Craig, Leontina Hormel, Dilshani Sarathchandra & John A. Mihelich - 2015 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 35 (5-6):166-177.details
|
|
Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research in Practice: Between Imaginaries of Collective Experimentation and Entrenched Academic Value Orders.Thomas Völker, Andrea Schikowitz, Judith Igelsböck & Ulrike Felt - 2016 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 41 (4):732-761.details
|
|
Problematic Publics: A Critical Review of Surveys of Public Attitudes to Biotechnology. [REVIEW]Renato Schibeci, Ian Barns & Aidan Davison - 1997 - Science, Technology and Human Values 22 (3):317-348.details
|
|
Putting Sociology First—Reconsidering the Role of the Social in ‘Nature of Science’ Education.Gábor Á Zemplén - 2009 - Science & Education 18 (5):525-559.details
|
|
Scientific Experts and the Controversy About Teaching Creation/Evolution in the UK Press.Joachim Allgaier - 2010 - Science & Education 19 (6-8):797-819.details
|
|
Deliberating responsibility: a collective contribution by the C’Nano IdF Nanoscience & Society Office.Stéphanie Lacour, Sacha Loeve, Brice Laurent, Virginie Albe, Aurélie Delemarle, Bernard Bartenlian & Sophie Lanone - 2015 - Foundations of Chemistry 17 (3):225-245.details
|
|
The ethics of ‘public understanding of ethics’—why and how bioethics expertise should include public and patients’ voices.Silke Schicktanz, Mark Schweda & Brian Wynne - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (2):129-139.details
|
|
Remaking Participation in Science and Democracy.Matthew Kearnes & Jason Chilvers - 2020 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 45 (3):347-380.details
|
|
Models of Public Engagement: Nanoscientists’ Understandings of Science–Society Interactions.Regula Valérie Burri - 2018 - NanoEthics 12 (2):81-98.details
|
|
Introduction: From “The Popularization of Science through Film” to “The Public Understanding of Science”.Fernando Vidal - 2018 - Science in Context 31 (1):1-14.details
|
|
How biotechnology regulation sets a risk/ethics boundary.Les Levidow & Susan Carr - 1997 - Agriculture and Human Values 14 (1):29-43.details
|
|
Policy legitimation, expert advice, and objectivity: 'Opening' the UK governance framework for human genetics.Mavis Jones - 2004 - Social Epistemology 18 (2 & 3):247 – 270.details
|
|
Deliberating risks under uncertainty: Experience, trust, and attitudes in a swiss nanotechnology stakeholder discussion group.Regula Valérie Burri - 2007 - NanoEthics 1 (2):143-154.details
|
|
The Paradox of E-Numbers: Ethical, Aesthetic, and Cultural Concerns in the Dutch Discourse on Food Additives. [REVIEW]Dirk Haen - 2014 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 27 (1):27-42.details
|
|
Knowledge or Understanding? Informed Choice in the Context of Newborn Bloodspot Screening.Stuart G. Nicholls - 2010 - Public Health Ethics 3 (2):128-136.details
|
|
Comprehension, Apprehension, Prehension: Heterogeneity and the Public Understanding of Science.Mike Michael - 2002 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 27 (3):357-378.details
|
|
Ethical Reflection Must Always be Measured.Alfred Moore, Sabine Könninger, Svea Luise Herrmann & Kathrin Braun - 2010 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 35 (6):839-864.details
|
|
The NIMBY syndrome: its significance in the history of the nuclear debate in Britain.Ian Welsh - 1993 - British Journal for the History of Science 26 (1):15-32.details
|
|
Public Involvement and Narrative Fallacies of Nanotechnologies.Erik Thorstensen - 2014 - NanoEthics 8 (3):227-240.details
|
|
Engineering Students’ Views of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Case Study from Petroleum Engineering.Jessica M. Smith, Carrie J. McClelland & Nicole M. Smith - 2017 - Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (6):1775-1790.details
|
|
Science, Politics, and the Mass Media: On Biased Communication of Environmental Issues.Nils Roll-Hansen - 1994 - Science, Technology and Human Values 19 (3):324-341.details
|
|