Contingency, Free Will, and Particular Providence

Religions 12 (2021)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The results from contemporary science, especially the theory of evolution and quantum physics, seem to favor process theology. Moreover, the evil committed by free will leads some theologians to reduce divine action in order to prevent God from being responsible for evil. Thus, among those who defend a particular providence, Molinism finds many followers. This article first argues that contemporary science does not constrain us to deny particular providence. Second, it criticizes the implicitly deterministic character of Molinism. Thirdly, a Thomistic solution is proposed as an alternative which, by means of a different metaphysical approach to cosmic contingency and freedom of will, defends particular providence without reducing divine activity except in personal sins.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TORCFW
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-10-06
View other versions
Added to PP index
2021-10-06

Total views
80 ( #56,693 of 71,281 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
49 ( #16,646 of 71,281 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.