Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Subordinating Truth – Is Acceptability Acceptable?George Boger - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (2):187-238.
    Argumentation logicians have recognized a specter of relativism to haunt their philosophy of argument. However, their attempts to dispel pernicious relativism by invoking notions of a universal audience or a community of model interlocutors have not been entirely successful. In fact, their various discussions of a universal audience invoke the context-eschewing formalism of Kant’s categorical imperative. Moreover, they embrace the Kantian method for resolving the antinomies that continually vacillates between opposing extremes – here between a transcendent universal audience and a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • (1 other version)The new rhetoric: a treatise on argumentation.Chaïm Perelman - 1969 - Notre Dame, [Ind.]: University of Notre Dame Press. Edited by Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca.
    The New Rhetoric is founded on the idea that since "argumentation aims at securing the adherence of those to whom it is addressed, it is, in its entirety, relative to the audience to be influenced," says Chaïm Perelman and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca, and they rely, in particular, for their theory of argumentation on the twin concepts of universal and particular audiences: while every argument is directed to a specific individual or group, the orator decides what information and what approaches will achieve (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   250 citations  
  • (1 other version)Return to reason.Stephen Toulmin - 2001 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    In Return to Reason, Stephen Toulmin argues that the potential for reason to improve our lives has been hampered by a serious imbalance in our pursuit of ...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   96 citations  
  • (1 other version)The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation.Chaïm Perelman & Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca - 1969 - Notre Dame, IN, USA: Notre Dame University Press. Edited by Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca.
    The New Rhetoric is founded on the idea that since “argumentation aims at securing the adherence of those to whom it is addressed, it is, in its entirety, relative to the audience to be influenced,” says Chaïm Perelman and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca, and they rely, in particular, for their theory of argumentation on the twin concepts of universal and particular audiences: while every argument is directed to a specific individual or group, the orator decides what information and what approaches will achieve (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   303 citations  
  • Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation.Trudy Govier - 2018 - Windsor: University of Windsor.
    We are pleased to publish this WSIA edition of Trudy’s Govier’s seminal volume, Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation. Originally published in 1987 by Foris Publications, this was a pioneering work that played a major role in establishing argumentation theory as a discipline. Today, it is as relevant to the field as when it first appeared, with discussions of questions and issues that remain central to the study of argument. It has defined the main approaches to many of those issues (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   128 citations  
  • Manifest Rationality: A Pragmatic Theory of Argument.Ralph H. Johnson - 2000 - Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
    He further argues that it is necessary to rethink traditional conceptions of argument, and to find a position that avoids the limitations of both the highly abstract approach of formal logic and the highly contextualized approaches of rhetoric and communication theory.".
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   337 citations  
  • Justice, Law, and Argument: Essays on Moral and Legal Reasoning.Kenneth I. Winston - 1982 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 43 (1):129-131.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Justice, Law, and Argument: Essays on Moral and Legal Reasoning.Ch Perelman - 1980 - Dordrecht and Boston: Reidel.
    This collection contains studies on justice, juridical reasoning and argumenta tion which contributed to my ideas on the new rhetoric. My reflections on justice, from 1944 to the present day, have given rise to various studies. The ftrst of these was published in English as The Idea of Justice and the Problem of Argument. The others, of which several are out of print or have never previously been published, are reunited in the present volume. As justice is, for me, the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  • The Uses of Argument.Stephen E. Toulmin - 1958 - Philosophy 34 (130):244-245.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   700 citations  
  • Fallacies.Charles Leonard Hamblin - 1970 - Newport News, Va.: Vale Press.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   355 citations  
  • (1 other version)Hegel's Lectures on the History of Philosophy.Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Elizabeth Sanderson Haldane & Frances H. Simpson - 1996 - Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press. Edited by Tom Rockmore, Elizabeth Sanderson Haldane & Frances H. Simson.
    This new abridgment of a well-known edition makes the main insights of Hegel's famous Lectures on the History of Philosophy widely available in an inexpensive edition.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Justice.Edmund L. Pincoffs & Chaim Perelman - 1970 - Philosophical Review 79 (2):292.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • The Realm of Rhetoric.Ch Perelman & William Kluback - 1982 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 17 (4):240-242.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   87 citations  
  • Humanist Principles Underlying Philosophy of Argument.George Boger - 2006 - Informal Logic 26 (2):149-174.
    This discussion reviews the thinking of some prominent philosophers of argument to extract principles common to their thinking. It shows that a growing concern with dialogical pragmatics is better appreciated as a part of applied ethics than of applied epistemology. The discussion concludes by indicating a possible consequence for philosophy of argument and invites further discussion by asking whether argumentation philosophy has an implicit, underlying moral, or even political, posture.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • The idea of justice and the problem of argument.Chaim Perelman - 1963 - New York,: Humanities Press.
    This book comprises a series of studies devoted to an analytic examination of reasoning in the field of conduct. The first is analysis of the idea of justice undertaken in a spirit of positivism; the series continues in a different vein necessitated by compelling obligation the author found himself under to work out a logic of value judgments. This logic is in fact the Rhetoric and Topics of antiquity: the author's "Traité de l' Argumentation gave this new life, and the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   34 citations  
  • Justice.Chaïm Perelman - 1967 - New York,: Random House.
    "In 'Justice', the result of many years' thoughtful exploration of that subject, Professor Perelman explains the conceptual origins of justice (both social and historical) and discusses the relationships between justice and justification, between justice and reason, and between reason and values. He considers the matter of a core of meaning, common to all, concerning the concept of justice, and raises essential questions such as why do people disagree about the problems of justice and whether a difference exists between a political (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation.Ch Perelman, L. Olbrechts-Tyteca, John Wilkinson & Purcell Weaver - 1969 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 3 (4):249-254.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   377 citations  
  • Review of Chaïm Perelman: The Idea of Justice and the Problem of Argument[REVIEW]William Sacksteder - 1964 - Ethics 75 (1):66-67.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • (1 other version)Fallacies.C. L. Hamblin - 1970 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 160:492-492.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   542 citations  
  • Human Understanding.S. Toulmin - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (1):41-61.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   97 citations  
  • The Uses of Argument.Frederick L. Will & Stephen Toulmin - 1960 - Philosophical Review 69 (3):399.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   185 citations  
  • (1 other version)Human Understanding.Stephen Toulmin - 1975 - Mind 84 (334):299-304.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   94 citations  
  • Justice, Law and Argument: Essays on Moral and Legal Reasoning.Chaïm Perelman - 1984 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 89 (4):562-563.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Acts of Arguing, A Rhetorical Model of Argument (ARNO R. LODDER).C. W. Tindale - 1999 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (1):73-78.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   110 citations  
  • (11 other versions)The Phenomenology of Mind.G. W. F. Hegel - 1912 - The Monist 22:318.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   50 citations  
  • (11 other versions)The Phenomenology of Mind.G. Hegel - 1932 - Philosophical Review 41:95.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   37 citations  
  • Justice, Law, and Argument: Essays on Moral and Legal Reasoning.Chaim Perelman - 1982 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 15 (1):73-75.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Acts of Arguing: A Rhetorical Model of Argument.Christopher William Tindale - 1999 - Albany, NY, USA: State University of New York Press.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   101 citations