- Epistemology of disagreement: The good news.David Christensen - 2007 - Philosophical Review 116 (2):187-217.details
|
|
The epistemic significance of disagreement.Thomas Kelly - 2005 - In Jeremy Fantl, Matthew McGrath & Ernest Sosa (eds.), Contemporary epistemology: an anthology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. pp. 167-196.details
|
|
Nominalism, Naturalism, Epistemic Relativism.William G. Lycan, Penelope Maddy, Gideon Rosen & Nathan Salmon - 2001 - Philosophical Perspectives 15:69–91.details
|
|
Epistemic permissiveness.Roger White - 2005 - Philosophical Perspectives 19 (1):445–459.details
|
|
When to defer to majority testimony – and when not.Philip Pettit - 2006 - Analysis 66 (3):179–187.details
|
|
When to defer to majority testimony - and when not.P. Pettit - 2006 - Analysis 66 (3):179-187.details
|
|
Religious diversity and its challenges to religious belief.Nathan L. King - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (4):830-853.details
|
|
Review of Gilbert Harman: Change in View: Principles of Reasoning. [REVIEW]Howard Margolis - 1986 - Ethics 99 (4):966-966.details
|
|
The Reflective Epistemic Renegade.Bryan Frances - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (2):419 - 463.details
|
|
Intellectual Trust in One's Self and Others.David Owens - 2003 - Mind 112 (447):536-539.details
|
|
What is the “Equal Weight View'?Branden Fitelson & David Jehle - 2009 - Episteme 6 (3):280-293.details
|
|
Reflection and disagreement.Adam Elga - 2007 - Noûs 41 (3):478–502.details
|
|
Epistemological puzzles about disagreement.Richard Feldman - 2006 - In Stephen Hetherington (ed.), Epistemology Futures. Oxford University Press. pp. 216-236.details
|
|
Change in View: Principles of Reasoning.Gilbert Harman - 1986 - Studia Logica 48 (2):260-261.details
|
|
Disagreement, Question-Begging and Epistemic Self-Criticism.David Christensen - 2011 - Philosophers' Imprint 11.details
|
|
A justificationist view of disagreement’s epistemic significance.Jennifer Lackey - 2008 - In Alan Millar Adrian Haddock & Duncan Pritchard (eds.), Social Epistemology. Oxford University Press. pp. 145-154.details
|
|