 On an Intuitionistic Modal Logic.G. M. Bierman & V. C. V. De Paiva  2000  Studia Logica 65 (3):383  416.details


The development of intuitionistic logic.Mark van Atten  unknowndetails


Farewell to SuppressionFreedom.Tore Fjetland Øgaard  2020  Logica Universalis 14 (3):297330.details


Universal Logic.Ross Brady  2006  CSLI Publications.details


Relevant Logics and Their Rivals.Richard Routley, Val Plumwood, Robert K. Meyer & Ross T. Brady  1982  Ridgeview. Edited by Richard Sylvan & Ross Brady.details


An Introduction to Substructural Logics.Greg Restall  1999  New York: Routledge.details


Relevant Logic: A Philosophical Examination of Inference.Stephen Read  1988  Oxford: WileyBlackwell.details


Beyond the Limits of Thought.Graham Priest  1995  Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.details


An Introduction to NonClassical Logic: From If to Is.Graham Priest  2008  New York: Cambridge University Press.details


The Connectives.Lloyd Humberstone  2011  MIT Press. Edited by Lloyd Humberstone.details


Saving truth from paradox.Hartry H. Field  2008  New York: Oxford University Press.details


Revenge of the liar: new essays on the paradox.J. C. Beall (ed.)  2007  New York: Oxford University Press.details


R and Relevance Principle Revisited.Eunsuk Yang  2013  Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (5):767782.details


A Note on the Relevance of Semilattice Relevance Logic.Yale Weiss  2019  Australasian Journal of Logic 16 (6):177185.details


Connectives stranger than tonk.Heinrich Wansing  2006  Journal of Philosophical Logic 35 (6):653  660.details


Modal logic.Yde Venema  2000  Philosophical Review 109 (2):286289.details


Semantics for relevant logics.Alasdair Urquhart  1972  Journal of Symbolic Logic 37 (1):159169.details


Roundabout the Runabout InferenceTicket.J. T. Stevenson  1960  Analysis 21 (6):124128.details


Varieties of Relevant S5.Shawn Standefer  2023  Logic and Logical Philosophy 32 (1):53–80.details


A metacompleteness theorem for contractionfree relevant logics.John K. Slaney  1984  Studia Logica 43 (12):159  168.details


Curry’s Paradox, Generalized Contraction Rule and Depth Relevance.Francisco Salto, Gemma Robles & José M. Méndez  2018  In Konstantinos Boudouris (ed.), Proceedings XXIII world Congress Philosophy. Charlottesville: Philosophy Documentation Center. pp. 3539.details


The american plan completed: Alternative classicalstyle semantics, without stars, for relevant and paraconsistent logics.Richard Routley  1984  Studia Logica 43 (12):131  158.details


Routes to triviality.Susan Rogerson & Greg Restall  2004  Journal of Philosophical Logic 33 (4):421436.details


Natural deduction and Curry's paradox.Susan Rogerson  2007  Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (2):155  179.details


The Class of All Natural Implicative Expansions of Kleene’s Strong Logic Functionally Equivalent to Łkasiewicz’s 3Valued Logic Ł3.Gemma Robles & José M. Méndez  2020  Journal of Logic, Language and Information 29 (3):349374.details


Curry’s Paradox, Generalized Modus Ponens Axiom and Depth Relevance.Gemma Robles & José M. Méndez  2014  Studia Logica 102 (1):185217.details


Blocking the Routes to Triviality with Depth Relevance.Gemma Robles & José M. Méndez  2014  Journal of Logic, Language and Information 23 (4):493526.details


A modal restriction of RMingle with the variablesharing property.Gemma Robles, José M. Méndez & Francisco Salto  2010  Logic and Logical Philosophy 19 (4):341351.details


A General Characterization of the VariableSharing Property by Means of Logical Matrices.Gemma Robles & José M. Méndez  2012  Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 53 (2):223244.details


A Class of Simpler Logical Matrices for the VariableSharing Property.G. Robles & J. M. Méndez  2011  Logic and Logical Philosophy 20 (3):241249.details


Paradoxes and Failures of Cut.David Ripley  2013  Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (1):139  164.details


Conservatively extending classical logic with transparent truth.David Ripley  2012  Review of Symbolic Logic 5 (2):354378.details


Anything Goes.David Ripley  2015  Topoi 34 (1):2536.details


Simplified semantics for relevant logics (and some of their rivals).Greg Restall  1993  Journal of Philosophical Logic 22 (5):481  511.details


On permutation in simplified semantics.Greg Restall & Tony Roy  2009  Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (3):333  341.details


How to be R eally ContractionFree.Greg Restall  1993  Studia Logica 52 (3):381  391.details


The structure of the paradoxes of selfreference.Graham Priest  1994  Mind 103 (409):2534.details


The runabout inference ticket.Arthur Prior  1967  In Peter Strawson (ed.), Analysis. Oxford University Press. pp. 389.details


The Runabout InferenceTicket.A. N. Prior  1960  Analysis 21 (2):3839.details


The logic of paradox.Graham Priest  1979  Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):219  241.details


Simplified semantics for basic relevant logics.Graham Priest & Richard Sylvan  1992  Journal of Philosophical Logic 21 (2):217  232.details


Boolean negation and all that.Graham Priest  1990  Journal of Philosophical Logic 19 (2):201  215.details


Meaning and proofs: On the conflict between classical and intuitionistic logic.Dag Prawitz  1977  Theoria 43 (1):240.details


Simplified KripkeStyle Semantics for Some Normal Modal Logics.Andrzej Pietruszczak, Mateusz Klonowski & Yaroslav Petrukhin  2020  Studia Logica 108 (3):451476.details


Ticket Entailment plus the mingle axiom has the variablesharing property.José M. Méndez, Gemma Robles & Francisco Salto  2012  Logic Journal of the IGPL 20 (1):355364.details


Nonstandard connectives of intuitionistic propositional logic.Michael Kaminski  1988  Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 29 (3):309331.details


Curry’s Paradox.Robert K. Meyer, Richard Routley & J. Michael Dunn  1979  Analysis 39 (3):124  128.details


Curry's paradox.Robert K. Meyer & Alonso Church  1979  Analysis 39 (3):124128.details


Classical relevant logics II.Robert K. Meyer & Richard Routley  1974  Studia Logica 33 (2):183  194.details

