We define a class of functions, the descent recursive functions, relative to an arbitrary elementary recursive system of ordinal notations. By means of these functions, we provide a general technique for measuring the proof-theoretic strength of a variety of systems of first-order arithmetic. We characterize the provable well-orderings and provably recursive functions of these systems, and derive various conservation and equiconsistency results.

Weiermann [18] introduces a new method to generate fast growing functions in order to get an elegant and perspicuous proof of a bounding theorem for provably total recursive functions in a formal theory, e.g., in PA. His fast growing function θαn is described as follows. For each ordinal α and natural number n let T α n denote a finitely branching, primitive recursive tree of ordinals, i.e., an ordinal as a label is attached to each node in the tree so (...) that the labelling is compatible with the tree ordering. Then the tree T α n is well founded and hence finite by Konig's lemma. Define θαn=the depth of the tree T α n =the length of the longest branch in T α n . We introduce new fast and slow growing functions in this mode of definitions and show that each of these majorizes provably total recursive functions in PA. (shrink)

The termination of rewrite systems for parameter recursion, simple nested recursion and unnested multiple recursion is shown by using monotone interpretations both on the ordinals below the first primitive recursively closed ordinal and on the natural numbers. We show that the resulting derivation lengths are primitive recursive. As a corollary we obtain transparent and illuminating proofs of the facts that the schemata of parameter recursion, simple nested recursion and unnested multiple recursion lead from primitive recursive functions to primitive recursive functions.

Weiermann [18] introduces a new method to generate fast growing functions in order to get an elegant and perspicuous proof of a bounding theorem for provably total recursive functions in a formal theory, e.g., in PA. His fast growing function $\theta\alpha$n is described as follows. For each ordinal $\alpha$ and natural number n let T$^\alpha_n$ denote a finitely branching, primitive recursive tree of ordinals, i.e., an ordinal as a label is attached to each node in the tree so that the (...) labelling is compatible with the tree ordering. Then the tree T$^\alpha_n$ is well founded and hence finite by Konig's lemma. Define $\theta\alpha$n=the depth of the tree T$^\alpha_n$=the length of the longest branch in T$^\alpha_n$. We introduce new fast and slow growing functions in this mode of definitions and show that each of these majorizes provably total recursive functions in PA. (shrink)

We show that the consistency of the first order arithmetic $PA$ follows from the pointwise induction up to the Howard ordinal. Our proof differs from U. Schmerl [Sc]: We do not need Girard's Hierarchy Comparison Theorem. A modification on the ordinal assignment to proofs by Gentzen and Takeuti [T] is made so that one step reduction on proofs exactly corresponds to the stepping down $\alpha\mapsto\alpha [1]$ in ordinals. Also a generalization to theories $ID_q$ of finitely iterated inductive definitions is proved.

In this, journal, W. Buchholz gave an elegant proof of a characterization theorem for provably total recursive functions in the theory IDv for the v-times iterated inductive definitions . He characterizes the classes of functions by Hardy functions. In this note we will show that a slow growing analogue to the theorem can be obtained by a slight modification of Buchholz' proof.

The slow growing hierarchy is commonly defined as follows: G0 = 0, Gx−1 := Gx + 1 and Gλ := Gλ[x] where λ<0 is a limit and ·[·]:0∩ Lim × ω → 0 is a given assignment of fundamental sequences for the limits below 0. The first obvious question which is encountered when one looks at this definition is: How does this hierarchy depend on the choice of the underlying system of fundamental sequences? Of course, it is well known and (...) easy to prove that for the standard assignment of fundamental sequence the hierarchy x<0 is slow growing, i.e. each Gx is majorized by a Kalmar elementary recursive function.It is shown in this paper that the slow growing hierarchy x<0 — when it is defined with respect to the norm-based assignment of fundamental sequences which is defined in the article by Cichon — is actually fast growing, i.e. each PA-provably recursive function is eventually dominated by Gx for some α<0. The exact classification of this hierarchy, i.e. the problem whether it is slow or fast growing, has been unsolved since 1992. The somewhat unexpected result of this paper shows that the slow growing hierarchy is extremely sensitive with respect to the choice of the underlying system of fundamental sequences.The paper is essentially self-contained. Only little knowledge about ordinals less than 0 — like the existence of Cantor normal forms, etc. and the beginnings of subrecursive hierarchy theory as presented, for example, in the 1984 textbook of Rose — is assumed. (shrink)

Inspired by Pohlers' proof-theoretic analysis of KPω we give a straightforward non-metamathematical proof of the (well-known) classification of the provably total functions of $PA, PA + TI(\prec\lceil)$ (where it is assumed that the well-ordering $\prec$ has some reasonable closure properties) and KPω. Our method relies on a new approach to subrecursion due to Buchholz, Cichon and the author.

Inspired by Pohlers' local predicativity approach to Pure Proof Theory and Howard's ordinal analysis of bar recursion of type zero we present a short, technically smooth and constructive strong normalization proof for Gödel's system T of primitive recursive functionals of finite types by constructing an ε 0 -recursive function [] 0 : T → ω so that a reduces to b implies [a] $_0 > [b]_0$ . The construction of [] 0 is based on a careful analysis of the Howard-Schütte (...) treatment of Gödel's T and utilizes the collapsing function ψ: ε 0 → ω which has been developed by the author for a local predicativity style proof-theoretic analysis of PA. The construction of [] 0 is also crucially based on ideas developed in the 1995 paper "A proof of strongly uniform termination for Gödel's T by the method of local predicativity" by the author. The results on complexity bounds for the fragments of T which are obtained in this paper strengthen considerably the results of the 1995 paper. Indeed, for given n let T n be the subsystem of T in which the recursors have type level less than or equal to n+2. (By definition, case distinction functionals for every type are also contained in T n .) As a corollary of the main theorem of this paper we obtain (reobtain?) optimal bounds for the T n -derivation lengths in terms of ω n+2 -descent recursive functions. The derivation lengths of type one functionals from T n (hence also their computational complexities) are classified optimally in terms of $ -descent recursive functions. In particular we obtain (reobtain?) that the derivation lengths function of a type one functional a ∈ T 0 is primitive recursive, thus any type one functional a in T 0 defines a primitive recursive function. Similarly we also obtain (reobtain?) a full classification of T 1 in terms of multiple recursion. As proof-theoretic corollaries we reobtain the classification of the IΣ n+1 -provably recursive functions. Taking advantage from our finitistic and constructive treatment of the terms of Gödel's T we reobtain additionally (without employing continuous cut elimination techniques) that PRA + PRWO ( $\varepsilon_0) \vdash \Pi^0_2$ - Refl(PA) and PRA + PRWO ( $\omega_{n+2}) \vdash \Pi^0_2$ - Refl(I Σ n+1 ), hence PRA + PRWO( $\epsilon_0) \vdash$ Con(PA) and PRA + PRWO( $\omega_{n+2}) \vdash$ Con(IΣ n+1 ). For programmatic reasons we outline in the introduction a vision of how to apply a certain type of infinitary methods to questions of finitary mathematics and recursion theory. We also indicate some connections between ordinals, term rewriting, recursion theory and computational complexity. (shrink)

It is shown that the so called slow growing hierarchy depends non trivially on the choice of its underlying structure of ordinals. To this end we investigate the growth rate behaviour of the slow growing hierarchy along natural subsets of notations for $\Gamma_0$. Let T be the set-theoretic ordinal notation system for $\Gamma_0$ and $T^{tree}$ the tree ordinal representation for $\Gamma$. It is shown in this paper that $_{\alpha \in T}$ matches up with the class of functions which are elementary (...) recursive in the Ackermann function as does $_{\alpha \in T^{tree}}$. By thinning out terms in which the addition function symbol occurs we single out subsystems $T* \subseteq T$ and $T^{tree*} \subseteq T^{tree}$ and prove that $_{\alpha \in T^{tree*}}$ still matches up with $_{\alpha \in T^{tree}}$ but $_{\alpha \in T*}$ now consists of elementary recursive functions only. We discuss the relationship between these results and the $\Gamma_0$-based termination proof for the standard rewrite system for the Ackermann function. (shrink)

Let $R$ be a (finite) rewrite system over a (finite) signature. Let $\succ$ be a strict well-founded termination ordering on the set of terms in question so that the rules of $R$ are reducing under $\succ$ . Then $R$ is terminating. In this article it is proved for a certain class of far reaching termination orderings (of order type reaching up to the first subrecursively inaccessible ordinal, i.e. the proof-theoretic ordinal of $ID_{<\omega}$ ) that – under some reasonable assumptions which (...) are met in current applications – the derivation lengths function for $R$ is bounded by a function from the slow growing hierarchy of level determined by the order type of the underlying termination ordering. This result is a (correction of the proof of and a) strong generalization of theorem 8.1 in Cichon's article Termination orderings and complexity characterisations. Leeds, Proof Theory 1990, (Aczel, Simmons, and Wainer, editors), Cambridge University Press 1992, 171-193. (shrink)