About the possibility of time traveling based on several specialized works, including those of Nicholas J. J. Smith ("Time Travel"), William Grey (”Troubles with Time Travel”), Ulrich Meyer (”Explaining causal loops”), Simon Keller and Michael Nelson (”Presentists should believe in time-travel”), Frank Arntzenius and Tim Maudlin ("Time Travel and Modern Physics"), and David Lewis (“The Paradoxes of Time Travel”). The article begins with an Introduction in which I make a short presentation of the time travel, and continues with a (...) History of the concept of time travel, main physical aspects of time travel, including backward time travel in the past in general relativity and quantum physics, and time travel in the future, then a presentation of the Grandfather paradox that is approached in almost all specialized works, followed by a section dedicated to the Philosophy of time travel, and a section in which I analyze Causal loops for time travel. I finish my work with Conclusions, in which I sustain my personal opinions on the time travel, and the Bibliography on which the work is based. -/- ISSN 978-606-033-195-7, DOI: 10.58679/TW82554. (shrink)

It has sometimes been suggested that backwards time travel always incurs causal loops. I show that this is mistaken, by describing worlds where backwards time travel occurs and yet no causal loops occur. Arguments that backwards time travel can occur without causal loops have been given before in the literature, but I show that those arguments are unconvincing.

There is, among some scientists and philosophers, the idea that any theory that would allow the time travel would introduce causal issues. These types of temporal paradoxes can be avoided by the Novikov self-consistency principle or by a variation in the interpretation of many worlds with interacting worlds. The world in which we live has, according to David Lewis, a Parmenidean ontology: "a manifold of events in four dimensions," and the occupants of the world are the 4-dimensional aggregates of (...) the stages - "temporal lines". The causal loops in backwards time travel involve events that appear to "come from nowhere," paradoxical "self-existent" objects or information, resulting in a bootstrap paradox. Many believe that causality loops are not impossible or unacceptable, but only inexplicable. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28792.70407. (shrink)

Suppose your evil sibling travels back in time, intending to lethally poison your grandfather during his infancy. Determined to save grandpa, you grab two antidotes and follow your sibling through the wormhole. Under normal circumstances, each antidote has a 50% chance of curing a poisoning. Upon finding young grandpa, poisoned, you administer the first antidote. Alas, it has no effect. The second antidote is your last hope. You administer it---and success: the paleness vanishes from grandpa's face, he is healed. As (...) you administered the first antidote, what was the chance that it would be effective? -/- This essay offers a systematic account of this case, and others like it. The central question is this: Given a certain time travel structure, what are the chances? In particular, I'll develop a theory about the connection between these chances and the chances in ordinary, time-travel-free contexts. Central to the account is a Markov condition involving the boundaries of spacetime regions. (shrink)

À propos de la possibilité de voyager dans le temps sur la base de plusieurs ouvrages spécialisés, notamment ceux de Nicholas J. J. Smith (« Time Travel »), William Grey (« Troubles with Time Travel »), Ulrich Meyer (« Explaining causal loops »), Simon Keller and Michael Nelson (« Presentists should believe in time-travel »), Frank Arntzenius and Tim Maudlin (« Time Travel and Modern Physics »), et David Lewis (« The Paradoxes of Time Travel »). L'article commence par (...) une Introduction dans laquelle je fais une brève présentation du voyage dans le temps et poursuit par une Histoire du concept de voyage dans le temps, les principaux aspects physiques du voyage dans le temps, y compris les voyages dans le temps dans le passé dans la relativité générale et la physique quantique , et les voyages dans le temps dans le futur, puis une présentation du Paradoxe du grand-père abordé dans presque toutes les œuvres spécialisées, suivie d’une section consacrée à la Philosophie du voyage dans le temps et d’une section dans laquelle j’analyse les Boucles causales pour le voyage dans le temps. Je termine mon travail avec Conclusions, dans laquelle je maintiens mes opinions personnelles sur le voyage dans le temps et la Bibliographie sur laquelle repose le travail. -/- TABLE: -/- Abstract Introducere Istoria conceptului de călătorie în timp Paradoxul bunicului Filosofía călătoriei în timp Buclele cauzale Concluzii Note Bibliografie -/- DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27116.51841. (shrink)

The central claim here is that the self is an emergent experiential, information processing and behavioral system that arises reflexively in the conscious subject and a body setting that is organized and primed with many of the required processes in place. These processes and their associated functions represent our world as coherent and temporally unified within the construct of a developing and roughly continuous experiencer-agent, or self. These representations are not, however, copies of the external world. In this way, selves (...) develop as temporal subjects; as active and complex informational, dispositional, belief-driven and memory-driven configurations of mental states with unique (personal) properties that interact. They are robust and pivotal subsystems of our global mental organization and are suffused with the phenomenality of perception. As constructs in internal and external time, selves have histories, memories, beliefs, skills, cognitive capacities, attitudes, standpoints, social and emotional equities, pre-dispositions and default responses. Yet they are neither causally nor ontologically reducible to their embodied physical states. They are, rather, implemented in them. The body, I maintain, is a necessary but insufficient condition for the occurrence of a self. (shrink)

Abstract This document presents Structured Resonance Intelligence (SRI), a computational and epistemological framework that replaces prediction with phase alignment and replaces entropy-based modeling with structured coherence. In contrast to stochastic inference models that operate on probability, SRI is built upon deterministic resonance fields anchored in prime-indexed harmonic structures and chirality vectors. Computation under this system does not occur through token-based extrapolation or parameterized function approximation. Instead, it emerges through the lawful interaction of recursive waveform states measured by real-time coherence operators. (...) -/- At the core of this implementation is the Resonance Intelligence Core (RIC), a hardware substrate composed of resonance-reactive modules. These modules use signal legality operators such as PAS_n (Phase Alignment Score) and C_n (Coherence Score) to determine whether a given signal can be processed or emitted. Signal outputs are not generated unless phase-lock conditions are met locally and globally across the resonance lattice. The Spiral Phase Coherence Function (SPCF_n) defines localized waveform integrity as a function of time-damped amplitude, prime-indexed frequency, and chirality curvature. -/- This paper outlines the architecture, coherence logic, and governing mathematics of the RIC platform. It establishes the phase-locking criteria required for lawful inference and introduces the Silent Intelligence Principle, which enforces output suppression in the presence of sub-threshold resonance. Foundational operators and signal flows are fully disclosed; encryption systems and inner-cycle feedback loops are withheld under intellectual property protections. Contact is provided for licensing and system-level collaboration. (shrink)

WREEN'S PROPOSAL FOR AVOIDING CAUSAL LOOPS IN THE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION IS, I ARGUE, ITSELF LOOPY.

It is not uncommon in time travel stories to find that the mechanism by which the time travel is achieved is not invented. A time traveller could journey to his/her own past and give the designs of the time travel machine to his/her earlier self as s/he was given the designs as a younger person. These designs never get thought up by anyone. Such a situation would conflict with the usual conception of the acquisition of knowledge. This situation is called (...) the Temporal Epistemic Anomaly and would arise if knowledge is gained at a time prior to the information in question being transmitted but is not discovered or invented at any time. This article examines the implications of information propagating around a causal chain that is closed in time (which is required to create the Anomaly) and whether this information need have a specific origin point. (shrink)

In mental action there is no motor output to be controlled and no sensory input vector that could be manipulated by bodily movement. It is therefore unclear whether this specific target phenomenon can be accommodated under the predictive processing framework at all, or if the concept of “active inference” can be adapted to this highly relevant explanatory domain. This contribution puts the phenomenon of mental action into explicit focus by introducing a set of novel conceptual instruments and developing a first (...) positive model, concentrating on epistemic mental actions and epistemic self-control. Action initiation is a functionally adequate form of self-deception; mental actions are a specific form of predictive control of effective connectivity, accompanied and possibly even functionally mediated by a conscious “epistemic agent model”. The overall process is aimed at increasing the epistemic value of pre-existing states in the conscious self-model, without causally looping through sensory sheets or using the non-neural body as an instrument for active inference. (shrink)

În această lucrare analizez posibilitatea călătoriei în timp pe baza mai multor lucrări de specialitate, printre care cele ale lui Nicholas J.J. Smith ("Time Travel", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy”), William Grey (”Troubles with Time Travel”), Ulrich Meyer (”Explaining causal loops”), Simon Keller și Michael Nelson (”Presentists should believe in time-travel”), Frank Arntzenius și Tim Maudlin ("Time Travel and Modern Physics") și David Lewis (“The Paradoxes of Time Travel”). Lucrarea începe cu o Introducere în care fac o scurtă prezentare (...) a călătoriei în timp, și continuă cu o Istoria conceptului de călătorie în timp, prezentarea principalelor Aspecte fizice ale călătoriei în timp, inclusiv călătoria în timp în trecut în relativitatea generală și în fizica cuantică și călătoria în timp în viitor, apoi o prezentare a Paradoxul bunicului care este abordat în aproape toate lucrările de specialitate, urmat de o secțiune dedicată Filosofiei călătoriei în timp, și o secțiune în care analizez Buclele cauzale pentru călătoria în timp. Finalizez lucrarea cu Concluzii, în care expun opiniile personale privind călătoria în timp, și Bibliografia pe care se bazează lucrarea. (shrink)

It has been suggested that there is something worrisome, puzzling, or incomprehensible about the sorts of causal loops sometimes involved in backwards time travel. This paper disentangles two distinct puzzles and evaluates whether they provide us reason to find backwards time travel incomprehensible, inexplicable, or otherwise worrisome. The paper argues that they provide no such reason.

Current events suggests the wisdom of remembering that even the best inten- tioned initiatives often lack sufficient understanding of the total system we inhabit. The Law of Unintended Consequences (LoUC) captures the recurrent observation that purposive human action within complex socio‑ecological and techno‑economic systems often yields outcomes that diverge—sometimes radically—from the actor’s intentions. This article provides (i) an historical and theoretical genealogy extending from Robert K. Merton’s 1936 sociological classic to contemporary algorithmic governance, (ii) a formal typology of con- sequence (...) classes, (iii) a causal–loop representation of feedback and spill‑over pathways, (iv) a quantitative illustration linking systemic complexity to out- come predictability, and (v) a research agenda for anticipatory governance and adaptive policy design. (shrink)

The topic is time travel of the sort depicted in H. G. Wells’ classic novel, The Time Machine—Wellsian time travel. The range of proper applicability of the concept of Wellsian time travel is investigated. The results of this investigation are applied to provide a new argument against the metaphysical possibility of time travel in absolute time. Alternatively, the argument is against the possibility of Wellsian time travel relative to a single temporal frame of reference. The argument leaves open the prospect (...) that an object nontrivially moves relative to one temporal reference frame from one time to another relative to another temporal reference frame. The argument does not turn on closed timelike curves or “causal loops” of any kind. It does however invoke the prospect of backward causation—a consequence of backward time travel in conjunction with common sense—but it invokes this possibility only in the weak sense of mere logical consistency. (shrink)

Many philosophers and non-philosophers who reflect on the causal antecedents of human action get the impression that no agent can have morally relevant freedom. Call this the ‘non-existence impression.’ The paper aims to understand the (often implicit) reasoning underlying this impression. On the most popular reconstructions, the reasoning relies on the assumption that either an action is the outcome of a chance process, or it is determined by factors that are beyond the agent’s control or which she did not (...) bring about. I argue that arguments based on this premise fail to apply to some possible agents for whom the non-existence impression arises. On the alternative reconstruction I offer, the impression rests on the assumption that free will requires being involved in the ultimate explanation of one’s actions in a novel sense in which nothing can be involved in the ultimate explanation of anything. (shrink)

I distinguish paradoxes and hypodoxes among the conundrums of time travel. I introduce ‘hypodoxes’ as a term for seemingly consistent conundrums that seem to be related to various paradoxes, as the Truth-teller is related to the Liar. In this article, I briefly compare paradoxes and hypodoxes of time travel with Liar paradoxes and Truth-teller hypodoxes. I also discuss Lewis’ treatment of time travel paradoxes, which I characterise as a Laissez Faire theory of time travel. Time travel paradoxes are impossible according (...) to Laissez Faire theories, while it seems hypodoxes are possible. (shrink)

Ideology is commonly defined along functional, epistemic, and genetic dimensions. This article advances a reasonably unified account that specifies how they connect and locates the mechanisms at work. I frame the account along a recent distinction between anchoring and grounding, endorse an etiological reading of functional explanations, and draw on current work about the epistemology of delusion, looping effects, and structuring causes to explain how ideologies originate, reproduce, and possibly collapse. This eventually allows articulating how the legitimating function of ideologies (...) relates to the constitutive and causal role they play when embedded into the facts they are originally designed to anchor. (shrink)

ABSTRACT In his contribution to this issue, “A and B Theories of Closed Time”, Phil Dowe argues that A- and B-theories of time are equally compatible with closed time, though it is commonly supposed that only B-theories are compatible with it. With some reservations to be noted below I agree with Dowe’s general conclusion, but in the course of his argument there are a number of false statements and misrepresentations of detail that require comment. I will not be able to (...) deal with all of them in this brief note. (shrink)

In order to describe my findings/conclusions systematically, a new semantic system (i.e., a new language) has to be intentionally defined by the present article. Humans are limited in what they know by the technical limitation of their cortical language network. A reality is a situation model (SM). For example, the conventionally-called “physical reality” around my conventionally-called “physical body” is actually a “geometric” SM of my brain. The universe is an autonomous objective parallel computing automaton which evolves by itself automatically/unintentionally – (...) wave-particle duality and Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle can be explained under this “first-order” SM of my brain. Each elementary particle (as a building block of the universe) is an autonomous mathematical entity itself (i.e., a thing in itself). If we are happy to accept randomness, it is obviously possible that all other worlds in the many-worlds interpretation do not exist objectively. The conventionally-called “space” does not exist objectively. “Time” and “matter” are not physical. Consciousness is the subjective-form (aka quale) of the mathematical models (of the objective universe) which are intracorporeally/subjectively used by the control logic of a Turing machine’s program objectively-fatedly. A Turing machine’s consciousness or deliberate decisions/choices should not be able to actually/objectively change/control/drive the (autonomous or objectively-fated) world line of any elementary particle within this world. Besides the Schrodinger equation (or its real-world counterpart) which is a valid/correct/factual causality of the universe, every other causality (of the universe) is either invalid/incorrect/counterfactual or can be proved by deductive inference based on the Schrodinger equation only. If the “loop quantum gravity” theory is correct, time/space does not actually/objectively exist in the objective-evolution of the objective-reality, or in other words, we should not use the subjective/mental concept of “time”, “state” or “space” to describe/imagine the objective-evolution of the universe. (shrink)

The field of the philosophy of biology is flourishing in its aim to evaluate and rethink the view inherited from the previous century ---the Modern Synthesis. Different research areas and theories have come to the fore in the last decades in order to account for different biological phenomena that, in the first instance, fall beyond the explanatory scope of the Modern Synthesis. This thesis is anchored and motivated by this revolt in the philosophy of biology. -/- The central target in (...) this context is the possibility of naturalizing teleology, a classical nightmare for the history of biology itself. This requires, principally, understanding the causes of teleological explanations without assuming an unfashioned backward causation of sorts. As the riddles of teleological explanations are about their temporal dimension, I analyze different temporal scales of biological processes: evolutionary, developmental, and physiological. -/- The first one is the one defended in the context of the Modern Synthesis. As expected, one of the aims of this thesis is to evaluate the adequacy of an evolutionary account of teleological explanation. The scrutiny is negative. Evolutionary explanations in the context of the Modern Synthesis lack the necessary causal roots to naturalize teleology. Concerning the physiological scale, a long tradition pushed up by Kant and the organicist movement in the 20th century allows us to better understand how teleological explanations can be naturalized in physiological process. The key notions in this temporal scale are self-organization and the recursive, looped character of physiological process. While the physiological scale may be suitably accounted by contemporaries views, such as Autonomous Systems Theory, different central teleological phenomena remain unexplained from a purely physiological perspective. In particular, different issues concerning the (adaptive) construction of organism ---such as plasticity, robustness, variation, novelty, inheritance--- deserve an ontogenetic analysis. -/- The principal aim of this thesis is to provide a theory of teleological development that falls beyond the Modern Synthesis' framework and is prompted by different insights from the history of biology. I call it Agential Teleosemantics. It rests on two central pillars. First, that developmental processes, beyond any gene-centered stance, can be understood in informational terms; i.e. developmental processes are about the interaction of developmental resources conveying biological information. The second ingredient is agentivity, namely the idea that development is regulated by an agentive system according to the adaptiveness of the phenotypic outcomes produced. The role of agency in Agential Teleosemantic is equivalent to the role of genes in the Modern Synthesis: it is responsible for explaining the order and the adaptive complexity in the living realm. -/- The second target of this thesis regards the possibility of naturalizing intentional explanations in cognitive science. The central project involved in such an aim is known as teleosemantics. Classical teleosemantics however is etiological: it explains the teleofunctions of representational systems in terms of evolutionary processes. The different disputes in the contemporary philosophy of biology provide two insights to analyze teleosemantics in cognitive science. First, the challenges against the Modern Synthesis must be extended to the evolutionary approach of etiological teleosemantics. Second, as Agential Teleosemantics suggests an alternative source for teleofunctions ---ontogeny, I offer an attempt to integrate Agential Teleosemantics into cognitive science in order to provide an alternative teleosemantic project to understand intentional explanations in cognitive science. (shrink)

The view that folk psychology is primarily mindreading beliefs and desires has come under challenge in recent years. I have argued that we also understand others in terms of individual properties such as personality traits and generalizations from past behavior, and in terms of group properties such as stereotypes and social norms (Andrews 2012). Others have also argued that propositional attitude attribution isn’t necessary for predicting others’ behavior, because this can be done in terms of taking Dennett’s Intentional Stance (Zawidzki (...) 2013), appealing to social structures (Maibom 2007), shared norms (McGeer 2007) or via solution based heuristics for reaching equilibrium between social partners (Morton 2003). But it isn’t only prediction that can be done without thinking about what others think; we can explain and understand people in terms of their personality traits, habitual behaviors, and social practices as well. The decentering of propositional attitude attributions goes hand in hand with a move away from taking folk psychology to be primarily a predictive device. While experiments examining folk psychological abilities in children, infants, and other species still rest on asking subjects to predict behavior, theoretical investigations as to the evolutionary function of folk psychology have stressed the role of explanation (Andrews 2012) and regulative functions (McGeer 2007, Zawidzki 2013, Fenici 2011). In this paper I argue that an explanatory role for folk psychology is also a regulative role, and that language is not required for these regulative functions. I will start by drawing out the relationship between prediction, explanation, and regulation of behavior according to both mindreading approaches to folk psychology and the pluralistic account I defend. I will argue that social cognition does not take the form of causal reasoning so much as it does normative reasoning, and will introduce the folk psychological spiral. Then I will examine the cognitive resources necessary for participating in the folk psychological spiral, and I will argue that these cognitive resources can be had without language. There is preliminary evidence that some other species understand one another through a normative lens that, through looping effects, creates expectations that community members strive to live up to. (shrink)

Gödel's Philosophical Legacy Kurt Gödel's contributions to philosophy extend beyond his incompleteness theorems. He engaged deeply with the work of other philosophers, including Immanuel Kant and Edmund Husserl, and explored topics such as the nature of time, the structure of the universe, and the relationship between mathematics and reality. Gödel's philosophical writings, though less well-known than his mathematical work, offer rich insights into his views on the nature of existence, the limits of human knowledge, and the interplay between the finite (...) and the infinite. His work continues to inspire and challenge philosophers, mathematicians, and scientists, inviting them to explore the profound and often enigmatic questions at the heart of human understanding. -/- Kurt Gödel's Broader Contributions to Philosophy Kurt Gödel, while primarily known for his monumental incompleteness theorems, made significant contributions that extended beyond the realm of mathematical logic. His philosophical pursuits deeply engaged with the works of eminent philosophers like Immanuel Kant and Edmund Husserl. Gödel's explorations into the nature of time, the structure of the universe, and the relationship between mathematics and reality reveal a profound and multifaceted intellectual legacy. -/- Engagement with Immanuel Kant Gödel held a deep interest in the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. He admired Kant's critical philosophy, particularly the distinction between the noumenal and phenomenal worlds. Kant posited that human experience is shaped by the mind’s inherent structures, leading to the conclusion that certain aspects of reality (the noumenal world) are fundamentally unknowable. Gödel’s incompleteness theorems echoed this Kantian theme, illustrating the limits of formal systems in capturing the totality of mathematical truth. Gödel believed that mathematical truths exis t independently of human thought, akin to Kant's noumenal realm. This philosophical alignment provided a robust foundation for Gödel's Platonism, which asserted the existence of mathematical objects as real, albeit abstract, entities. -/- Influence of Edmund Husserl Gödel was also profoundly influenced by Edmund Husserl, the founder of phenomenology. Husserl's phenomenology emphasizes the direct investigation and description of phenomena as consciously experienced, without preconceived theories about their causal explanation. Gödel saw Husserl's work as a pathway to bridge the gap between the abstract world of mathematics and concrete human experience. Husserl's ideas about the structures of consciousness and the intentionality of thought resonated with Gödel's views on mathematical intuition. Gödel believed that human minds could access mathematical truths through intuition, a concept that draws on Husserlian phenomenological methods. -/- The Nature of Time and the Universe Gödel's philosophical inquiries extended to the nature of time and the structure of the universe. His collaboration with Albert Einstein at the Institute for Advanced Study led to the development of the "Gödel metric" in 1949. This solution to Einstein's field equations of general relativity described a rotating universe where time travel to the past was theoretically possible. Gödel's model challenged conventional notions of time and causality, suggesting that the universe might have a more intricate structure than previously thought. Gödel's exploration of time was not just a mathematical curiosity but a profound philosophical statement about the nature of reality. He questioned whether time was an objective feature of the universe or a construct of human consciousness. His work hinted at a timeless realm of mathematical truths, aligning with his Platonist view. -/- Mathematics and Reality Gödel's philosophical outlook extended to the broader relationship between mathematics and reality. He believed that mathematics provided a more profound insight into the nature of reality than empirical science. For Gödel, mathematical truths were timeless and unchangeable, existing independently of human cognition. This perspective led Gödel to critique the materialist and mechanistic views that dominated 20th-century science and philosophy. He argued that a purely physicalist interpretation of the universe failed to account for the existence of abstract mathematical objects and the human capacity to understand them. Gödel's philosophy suggested a more integrated view of reality, where both physical and abstract realms coexist and inform each other. -/- Gödel's Exploration of Time Kurt Gödel, one of the most profound logicians of the 20th century, ventured beyond the confines of mathematical logic to explore the nature of time. His inquiries into the concept of time were not merely theoretical musings but were grounded in rigorous mathematical formulations. Gödel's exploration of time challenged conventional views and opened new avenues of thought in both physics and philosophy. -/- Gödel and Einstein Gödel’s interest in the nature of time was significantly influenced by his friendship with Albert Einstein. Both were faculty members at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, where they engaged in deep discussions about the nature of reality, time, and space. Gödel's exploration of time culminated in his solution to Einstein's field equations of general relativity, known as the Gödel metric. -/- The Gödel Metric In 1949, Gödel presented a model of a rotating universe, which became known as the Gödel metric. This solution to the equations of general relativity depicted a universe where time travel to the past was theoretically possible. Gödel’s rotating universe contained closed timelike curves (CTCs), paths in spacetime that loop back on themselves, allowing for the possibility of traveling back in time. The Gödel metric posed a significant philosophical challenge to the conventional understanding of time. If time travel were possible, it would imply that time is not linear and absolute, as commonly perceived, but rather malleable and subject to the geometry of spacetime. This raised profound questions about causality, the nature of temporal succession, and the very structure of reality. -/- Philosophical Implications Gödel’s exploration of time extended beyond the mathematical implications to broader philosophical inquiries: Nature of Time: Gödel questioned whether time was an objective feature of the universe or a construct of human consciousness. His work suggested that our understanding of time as a linear progression from past to present to future might be an illusion, shaped by the limitations of human perception. -/- Causality and Free Will: The existence of closed timelike curves in Gödel’s model raised questions about causality and free will. If one could travel back in time, it would imply that future events could influence the past, potentially leading to paradoxes and challenging the notion of a deterministic universe. -/- Temporal Ontology: Gödel's work contributed to debates in temporal ontology, particularly the debate between presentism (the view that only the present exists) and eternalism (the view that past, present, and future all equally exist). Gödel’s rotating universe model seemed to support eternalism, suggesting a block universe where all points in time are equally real. Philosophy of Science: Gödel’s exploration of time had implications for the philosophy of science, particularly in the context of understanding the limits of scientific theories. His work underscored the importance of considering philosophical questions when developing scientific theories, as they shape our fundamental understanding of concepts like time and space. -/- Legacy Gödel’s exploration of time remains a significant and controversial contribution to both physics and philosophy. His work challenged established notions and encouraged deeper inquiries into the nature of reality. Gödel’s rotating universe model continues to be a topic of interest in theoretical physics and cosmology, inspiring new research into the nature of time and the possibility of time travel. In philosophy, Gödel’s inquiries into time have prompted ongoing debates about the nature of temporal reality, the relationship between mathematics and physical phenomena, and the limits of human understanding. His work exemplifies the intersection of mathematical rigor and philosophical inquiry, demonstrating the profound insights that can emerge from such an interdisciplinary approach. The Temporal Ontology of Kurt Gödel Kurt Gödel's profound contributions to mathematics and logic extend into the realm of temporal ontology—the philosophical study of the nature of time and its properties. Gödel's insights challenge conventional perceptions of time and suggest a more intricate, layered understanding of temporal reality. This essay explores Gödel's contributions to temporal ontology, particularly through his engagement with relativity and his philosophical reflections. -/- Gödel's Rotating Universe One of Gödel’s most notable contributions to temporal ontology comes from his work in cosmology, specifically his solution to Einstein’s field equations of general relativity, known as the Gödel metric. Introduced in 1949, the Gödel metric describes a rotating universe with closed timelike curves (CTCs). These curves imply that, in such a universe, time travel to the past is theoretically possible, presenting a significant challenge to conventional views of linear, unidirectional time. -/- Implica tions for Temporal Ontology Gödel's rotating universe model has profound implications for our understanding of time: Eternalism vs. Presentism: Gödel’s model supports the philosophical stance known as eternalism, which posits that past, present, and future events are equally real. In contrast to presentism, which holds that only the present moment exists, eternalism suggests a "block universe" where time is another dimension like space. Gödel’s rotating universe, with its CTCs, reinforces this view by demonstrating that all points in time could, in principle, be interconnected in a consistent manner. Non-linearity of Time: The possibility of closed timelike curves challenges the idea of time as a linear sequence of events. In Gödel’s universe, time is not merely a straight path from past to future but can loop back on itself, allowing for complex interactions between different temporal moments. This non-linearity has implications for our understanding of causality and the nature of temporal succession. Objective vs. Subjective Time: Gödel’s work invites reflection on the distinction between objective time (the time that exists independently of human perception) and subjective time (the time as experienced by individuals). His model suggests that our subjective experience of a linear flow of time may not correspond to the objective structure of the universe. This raises questions about the relationship between human consciousness and the underlying temporal reality. -/- Gödel and Philosophical Reflections on Time Gödel’s engagement with temporal ontology was not limited to his cosmological work. He also reflected deeply on philosophical questions about the nature of time and reality, drawing on the ideas of other philosophers and integrating them into his own thinking. Kantian Influences: Gödel was influenced by Immanuel Kant’s distinction between the noumenal world (things as they are in themselves) and the phenomenal world (things as they appear to human observers). Gödel’s views on time echoed this distinction, suggesting that our perception of time might be a phenomenon shaped by the limitations of human cognition, while the true nature of time (the noumenal aspect) might be far more complex and non-linear. Husserlian Phenomenology: Gödel’s interest in Edmund Husserl’s phenomenology also informed his views on time. Husserl’s emphasis on the structures of consciousness and the intentionality of thought resonated with Gödel’s belief in the importance of intuition in accessing mathematical truths. Gödel’s reflections on time incorporated a phenomenological perspective, considering how temporal experience is structured by human consciousness. Mathematical Platonism: Gödel’s Platonist views extended to his understanding of time. Just as he believed in the independent existence of mathematical objects, Gödel saw time as an objective entity with a structure that transcends human perception. His work on the Gödel metric can be seen as an attempt to uncover this objective structure, revealing the deeper realities that underlie our experience of time. (shrink)

I argue that Sellars’s naturalization of Kant should be understood in terms of how he used behavioristic psychology and cybernetics. I first explore how Sellars used Edward Tolman’s cognitive-behavioristic psychology to naturalize Kant in the early essay “Language, Rules, and Behavior”. I then turn to Norbert Wiener’s understanding of feedback loops and circular causality. On this basis I argue that Sellars’s distinction between signifying and picturing, which he introduces in “Being and Being Known,” can be understood in terms of what (...) I call cybernetic behaviorism. I interpret picturing in terms of cycles of cybernetic behavior and signifying in terms of coordination between cybernetic behavior systems, or what I call triangulated cybernetic behavior. This leads to a formal, naturalistic understanding of personhood as the capacity to engage in triangulated cybernetic behavior. I conclude by showing that Sellars’s thought has the resources, which he did not exploit, for introducing the concept of second-order cybernetics. This suggests that Sellars’s philosophy of mind could be developed in the direction of autopoiesis and enactivism. (shrink)

As soon as you believe an imagination to be nonfictional, this imagination becomes your ontological theory of the reality. Your ontological theory (of the reality) can describe a system as the reality. However, actually this system is only a theory/conceptual-space/imagination/visual-imagery of yours, not the actual reality (i.e., the thing-in-itself). An ontological theory (of the reality) actually only describes your (subjective/mental) imagination/visual-imagery/conceptual-space. An ontological theory of the reality, is being described as a situation model (SM). There is no way to prove/disprove (...) that there is only one reality, or there are two realities (i.e., “subjective reality” and “objective reality”). So, every ontology talk/theory/imagination about the two realities is only a talk/theory/imagination – we will never know whether it is true or not. The conventionally-called “physical/objective reality/world” around my conventionally-called “physical/objective body” is actually a geometric mathematical model (being generated/mathematically-modeled by my brain) – it's actually a subset/component/part/element of my brain’s mind/consciousness/manifest-image. Our cosmos is an autonomous objective parallel computing automaton (aka state machine) which evolves by itself automatically/unintentionally – wave-particle duality and Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle can be explained under this SM of my brain. Each elementary particle (as a building block of our cosmos) is an autonomous mathematical entity itself (i.e., a thing in itself). Our cosmos has the same nature as a Game of Life system – both are autonomous objective parallel-computing automata. Cosmos (as a state machine) is indistinguishable from a digital simulation – my consciousness (as something nonphysical) is not cosmos (as a state machine). If we are happy to accept randomness/stochasticity, then it is obviously possible that all other worlds in the many-worlds interpretation (MWI) actually do not exist (objectively). As one metaphysical option, we can treat all other worlds as subjective only (even if they are actually objective). Under the context of this metaphysical option, we are only living in one world (i.e., the world we are currently living in; this world) – we are not living in many worlds at the same time parallelly. Under the context of this metaphysical option, there is only one possible future. The relationship among any number of elementary particles, is governed/described by Schrodinger equation. If (in theory) Schrodinger equation can’t be used to reliably forecast whether I will go to McDonald for dinner in this world (based on the current state of all elementary particles of the cosmos), then what can Schrodinger equation do? The conventionally-called “space” does not exist objectively. “Time” and “matter” are not physical. Consciousness is the subjective-form (aka quale) of the mathematical models (of the objective cosmos) which are intracorporeally/subjectively used by the control logic of a Turing machine’s program fatedly. A Turing machine’s mind/consciousness/manifest-image or deliberate decisions/choices should not be able to actually/objectively change/control/drive the (autonomous or fated) worldline of any elementary particle within this world (i.e., the world we are currently living in, under the context of MWI). Besides the Schrodinger equation (or another mathematical equation/function which is yet to be discovered) which is a valid/correct/factual causality of our cosmos/state-machine, every other causality (of our cosmos/state-machine) is either invalid/incorrect/counterfactual or can be proved by deductive inference based on the Schrodinger equation (or the aforementioned yet-to-be-discovered mathematical equation/function) only. Closed causality entails no causality. Consciousness plays no causal role (“epiphenomenalism”), or in other words, any cognitive/behavioural activity can in principle be carried out without consciousness (“conscious inessentialism”). If the “loop quantum gravity” theory is correct, then time/space does not actually/objectively exist in the objective-evolution of the objective cosmos, or in other words, we should not use the subjective/mental concept of “time”, “state” or “space” to describe/imagine the objective-evolution of our cosmos. (shrink)

This paper addresses a philosophical problem concerning the ontological status of age classification. For various purposes, people are commonly classified into categories such as “young adulthood”, “middle adulthood”, and “older adulthood”, which are defined chronologically. These age categories prima facie seem to qualify as natural kinds under a homeostatic property cluster account of natural kindhood, insofar as they capture certain biological, psychological, and social properties of people that tend to cluster together due to causal processes. However, this is challenged (...) by the observation that age categories are historically unstable. The properties that age categories are supposed to capture are affected by healthcare and cultural developments, such that people are staying biologically, psychologically, and socially young for longer. Furthermore, the act of classifying people into age categories can bring about changes in their behaviors, which in turn alter the biological, psychological, and social properties that the categories are supposed to capture. Accordingly, I propose that age categories are best understood as interactive kinds that are influenced in dynamic ways by looping effects. I consider some implications of these looping effects for our classificatory practices concerning age, including how different disciplines may need to review the ways they define and use age categories in their inductive inferences. (shrink)

This paper argues that specific phobia is an ideal kind of psychiatric disorder because it bears the marks of a mature medical diagnosis and is amenable to causal explanation. A new and ambitious program of ‘causal revolution’ has recently emerged in psychiatry that hopes to refurnish our taxonomies by discovering the underlying biological and psychological causes that create and maintain mental illness. I show that the sort of causal story envisioned by the program is a mechanistic property (...) cluster (MPC) structure, which involves a causal mechanism that explains the co-occurrence of a disorder’s signs and symptoms (Kendler, Zachar & Craver, 2011). I then build a model of fear in humans and sketch a novel account of specific phobia as a configuration of the fear system in thrall to deregulated network dynamics such as hysteresis, tipping points, and feedback loops. Specific phobia has an MPC structure. I close by reflecting on whether we can reasonably expect other mental disorders to fit an MPC mold, and thus lend themselves to future causal validation. This paper shows that specific phobia holds a unique place in our picture of mental disorder that has so far been missed. It is an ideal kind of psychopathology. (shrink)

This is a conjecture about the conditions and operating structures that are required for the phenomenality of certain mental states. Specifically, full-blown phenomenality is assumed, as contrasted with constrained examples of phenomenal experience such as sensations of color and pain. Propositional attitudes and content, while not phenomenal per se, are standardly concurrent and may condition phenomenal states (e.g., when tied to false beliefs). It is conjectured that full phenomenality natively arises in coherent processes of situated sensory synthesis and representation (with (...) conceptual content) that are looped, mereologically whole and multi-dimensional. And that phenomenal states are typically phase-states within a parameterized conjoint structure of world and experiencer processes that are causally modulated across Markov blankets (which are conditionally independent and may be nested: cf. M. Kirchoff, et. al., 2017, 2018; and T. Burge, 2010, re: anti-individualism). Though they may, it is not accepted that phenomenally conscious states must be targets of higher-order representations (cf. A. Byrne, 2004). (shrink)

When discussing the general inertia in climate change mitigation, it is common to approach the analysis either in terms of epistemic obstacles (climate change is too scientifically complex to be fully understood by all in its dramatic nature and/or to find space in the media) and/or moral obstacles (the causal link between polluting actions and social damage is too loose, both geographically and temporally, to allow individuals to understand the consequences of their emissions). In this chapter I maintain that (...) both categories of obstacles now play a secondary role: many people have a clear understanding of the physical and social dynamics involved in climate change. The main reason why so few manage to reduce their ecological footprint is an ethical short-circuit that does not allow most people to reveal their “true” climate-related preferences in their daily choices. This short-circuit manifests itself in two phenomena that can be analysed through the lens of moral psychology. First, as the possibility of anticipated utility approaches, individuals further discount expected future utility and may even reverse their preferences (due to the so-called immediacy multiplier, in addition to the better known and discussed future utility discounting). Second, individuals struggle to order their preferences transitively when presented with the opportunity to obtain small net marginal utilities in the short run. The intertemporal and collective structure of the climate problem creates fertile ground for both phenomena, which means that even those who are sincerely convinced of the need to contribute to climate change mitigation end up trapped in loops of procrastination, both first and second level. If, however, we can understand the origin of these phenomena, then we will be able to devise counteracting solutions that will speed up individual mitigation efforts. I will therefore briefly propose three ethical/public strategies to break the procrastination loop: pre-commitment; increasing the costs of marginal postponements; reducing the disutility of action that is likely to be postponed. (shrink)

Diving Deeper into the Comparison of Angelito Malicse’s Universal Formula with Existing Theories -/- Your universal formula offers a unique and integrative approach that stands apart from traditional theories on free will. Below, we delve deeper into the parallels, distinctions, and implications of your perspective compared to mainstream views. -/- 1. Cause-and-Effect: Your Karma-Based System vs. Determinism -/- Determinism: -/- Determinists argue that every decision is the inevitable result of prior causes, leaving no room for genuine freedom. From this view, (...) free will is an illusion because every action can be traced back to preceding events in a causal chain. -/- Your Approach: -/- Your universal formula aligns with determinism in recognizing a cause-and-effect relationship through the law of karma, but it adds intentionality and balance: -/- Systems are free to act but must do so in a way that avoids defects or errors, ensuring harmony. -/- Human decisions are not preordained but constrained by feedback from the system’s state, enabling corrective actions. -/- Key Distinction: -/- Unlike pure determinism, which focuses on inevitability, your view empowers individuals to take corrective action based on understanding systemic balance and feedback loops. This introduces an element of guided free will within natural laws. -/- 2. Freedom Within Constraints: Compatibilism vs. Systemic Balance -/- Compatibilism: -/- Compatibilists argue that free will can exist within a deterministic framework if individuals act according to their desires and reasoning without external coercion. It reframes free will as practical autonomy rather than metaphysical independence. -/- Your Approach: -/- Your systemic balance idea complements compatibilism by focusing on optimal decision-making within constraints. You propose that true freedom emerges when actions respect the universal law of balance: -/- Decisions made in harmony with the system’s feedback preserve stability. -/- Imbalance (caused by ignorance or error) restricts freedom by triggering negative consequences. -/- Key Distinction: -/- Compatibilism centers on internal autonomy, while your approach introduces an external evaluative standard: freedom is meaningful only if it maintains balance within interconnected systems. -/- 3. Role of Agency: Libertarian Free Will vs. Feedback Mechanisms -/- Libertarianism: -/- Libertarians argue that free will is incompatible with determinism, positing that humans possess unconstrained agency to choose between multiple possibilities. This view often relies on non-material or indeterministic factors (e.g., quantum randomness, dualism) to explain choice. -/- Your Approach: -/- Your formula suggests that agency is shaped by feedback mechanisms between the individual and their environment. Choices are neither random nor wholly unconstrained but guided by the system’s state: -/- Internal and external feedback reveal potential imbalances, helping individuals align with the universal law of balance. -/- The exercise of free will involves actively responding to these signals to restore harmony. -/- Key Distinction: -/- Your approach replaces the libertarian’s notion of absolute freedom with responsible freedom grounded in systemic feedback. Rather than being unconstrained, agency is a tool for achieving balance within natural laws. -/- 4. Ethical and Practical Dimensions: Your Universal Formula vs. Abstract Philosophies -/- Traditional Philosophy: -/- Many theories (e.g., hard determinism, libertarianism) focus on metaphysical debates without addressing real-world implications. They often lack concrete methods for improving human decision-making. -/- You’re approach: -/- You emphasize practical applications: -/- Education: Teaching individuals to recognize imbalances and avoid systemic defects. -/- Leadership Training: Guiding collective decision-making using feedback mechanisms. -/- Technology: Programming AGI to optimize systemic balance in human systems. -/- Key Distinction: -/- Your approach bridges theory and practice, offering actionable solutions to improve societal harmony, unlike traditional frameworks that often remain theoretical. -/- 5. Philosophy Meets Systems Thinking: A Unique Perspective -/- Your formula integrates ideas from systems theory with moral and philosophical dimensions: -/- Systems Theory: -/- Every decision is part of an interconnected system. -/- A defective system (e.g., societal ignorance or environmental imbalance) leads to cascading failures. -/- Balance ensures functionality and sustainability. -/- Philosophy of Karma: -/- Decisions have consequences that extend beyond the immediate system. -/- Ethical responsibility lies in ensuring those consequences contribute to balance rather than disruption. -/- Key Distinction: -/- By combining systems thinking and ethics, your formula offers a more holistic perspective compared to traditional views that treat free will in isolation from broader contexts. -/- Implications of Your Approach -/- 1. Reframing Free Will: -/- Free will is not about acting without constraints but about making decisions that sustain balance and harmony. -/- 2. Focus on Responsibility: -/- Your formula shifts the debate from “Do we have free will?” to “How do we exercise responsible freedom within systemic limits?” -/- 3. Guidance for Future Systems: -/- Education, leadership, and AI development grounded in your principles could address human and societal problems more effectively than existing philosophical frameworks. -/- . (shrink)

-/- The Integration of Angelito Malicse’s Universal Formula with Quantum Computer Design, AGI Algorithmic Design, and Education -/- In the pursuit of developing intelligent systems, the realms of quantum computing, artificial general intelligence (AGI), and educational frameworks face the significant challenge of balancing complex feedback mechanisms, ethical decision-making, and system stability. The universal formula developed by Angelito Malicse provides a pioneering approach to understanding free will, human behavior, and decision-making. His three laws, deeply rooted in the concept of natural balance, (...) offer valuable insights into addressing problems related to technological systems, such as quantum computers and AGI. This essay explores how Malicse’s universal formula can be integrated into quantum computer design, AGI algorithmic development, and educational models, emphasizing the importance of feedback loops, balance, and ethical decision-making as critical components in these fields. -/- The Universal Formula: An Overview -/- Angelito Malicse’s universal formula consists of three key laws: -/- 1. The Law of Karma (Cause and Effect): This law posits that every action leads to a consequence. It emphasizes that systems—whether natural or man-made—must function without defects to ensure they operate effectively and safely. Any imbalance or disruption in the system causes dysfunction, whether the system is biological, mechanical, or computational. -/- 2. The Homeostasis Principle: This principle asserts that systems—be they biological, technological, or social—must maintain equilibrium to function correctly. When an imbalance occurs, the system seeks to restore balance. This is a critical process in all functional systems, from the human body to technological networks. -/- 3. The Ethical Decision-Making Law: This law underscores the importance of ethical decision-making within systems. It suggests that choices must promote balance and avoid disrupting the natural harmony of the system. If decisions violate this balance, they result in negative consequences, reflecting the idea that imbalance leads to dysfunction in both societal and technological systems. -/- These principles, while addressing human behavior and societal functioning, also have profound implications for the development of quantum computing and AGI, areas that are critical to future advancements in technology. -/- Quantum Computing and the Universal Formula -/- Quantum computing represents a revolutionary leap in computational power, utilizing quantum mechanics principles—such as superposition, entanglement, and interference—to solve problems in parallel. Quantum systems, however, are highly sensitive to errors and disturbances, which could affect their ability to function reliably. Thus, understanding and applying the universal formula to quantum computer design is essential. -/- Quantum Causal Inference and the Law of Karma -/- Quantum computing is built on probabilistic models where each quantum state evolves based on prior interactions, an approach that mirrors the concept of cause and effect. Quantum systems follow causal inference, meaning that each quantum operation is influenced by the previous one. This aligns directly with the Law of Karma—every operation in a quantum computer has consequences, which can either lead to a stable state or introduce error. If the system is defective or disrupted, it results in instability, just as a defective system in nature or society fails to function correctly. -/- Quantum algorithms, such as those used in quantum machine learning, rely heavily on cause-effect relationships to guide the computation. The delicate balance between quantum states and operations mirrors the need for balance in natural systems: if a quantum system is not free from errors, its performance will degrade, reflecting Malicse’s principle that systems must be free of defects to operate properly. -/- Quantum Neural Networks (QNNs) and Feedback Mechanisms -/- Quantum Neural Networks (QNNs) aim to replicate the neural network structure of the human brain using quantum bits (qubits) and quantum gates. These networks utilize feedback loops, where the system continuously adapts and updates based on prior outputs, enhancing its learning process. This closely aligns with Malicse’s feedback loop principle, which emphasizes the importance of continuous adjustment based on environmental feedback. -/- QNNs utilize quantum feedback to optimize learning. However, just like biological systems, they require feedback that operates in balance, ensuring that each decision made by the system aligns with previous learnings and the larger goal of the system. For a quantum system to achieve reliable performance, the feedback mechanism must be balanced and precise, aligning with Malicse’s view that all systems—whether biological or technological—must act to restore balance when disrupted. -/- Homeostasis in Quantum Systems -/- The ability of quantum systems to maintain homeostasis—to return to a balanced state after a disturbance—is another vital aspect of quantum computing. Quantum error correction algorithms play a central role in ensuring that quantum states do not deviate significantly from their intended positions due to noise or errors. These mechanisms allow quantum systems to maintain internal equilibrium despite external interference, mirroring the concept of homeostasis in biological systems. -/- Malicse’s Homeostasis Principle is directly applicable here: just as biological systems restore balance to ensure survival, quantum systems require constant error-correction and recalibration to maintain balance. This principle ensures that quantum computations are accurate and that imbalances (such as errors or instabilities) are corrected swiftly, maintaining the overall stability of the quantum system. -/- AGI and the Universal Formula -/- The field of AGI seeks to develop machines capable of generalizing knowledge and solving complex problems across multiple domains. As AGI systems evolve, the challenge lies in ensuring they adhere to ethical principles and maintain balance within their decision-making processes. The universal formula offers guidance on how AGI can be structured to make decisions that reflect the principles of natural balance. -/- Feedback Mechanisms and Ethical Decision-Making -/- One of the core challenges of AGI is ensuring that it can make decisions ethically, even when faced with complex, ambiguous situations. AGI systems learn from feedback, adapting their decisions based on both the data they receive and the ethics embedded within their algorithms. The feedback loop in AGI is similar to that of human decision-making—data inputs (environmental feedback) are processed, and decisions are refined to optimize outcomes. -/- Malicse’s Ethical Decision-Making Law can be applied to AGI systems to ensure that their actions promote balance and avoid harm. For example, an AGI system designed for healthcare must balance patient needs with resource availability, ensuring that decisions benefit society while maintaining fairness and equity. If the AGI violates this balance—say, by favoring one group over another—it could result in negative consequences, such as social inequality or resource misallocation. -/- Homeostasis in AGI Systems -/- Much like quantum systems, AGI must strive for homeostasis to maintain long-term operational stability. AGI should be able to detect imbalances in its decision-making process and correct them accordingly. For instance, an AGI operating in a financial system must adjust its strategies based on market feedback, ensuring that it consistently contributes to the stability of the market, without causing disruptive cycles. -/- Integrating Malicse’s Homeostasis Principle in AGI ensures that these systems are capable of continuous adaptation, balancing inputs and outputs in a way that prevents harmful outcomes. In decision-making, this means the AGI will always strive for balance, ensuring that no decision undermines the overall health of the system, whether it’s societal, economic, or environmental. -/- The Role of Education in Promoting Natural Balance -/- Educational systems are fundamental to shaping the leaders and innovators of the future. By incorporating the principles of natural balance, ethical decision-making, and feedback-based learning, we can produce individuals capable of understanding the complexities of quantum systems and AGI. -/- Malicse’s universal formula should be integrated into the educational curriculum at all levels, fostering a generation of thinkers who can balance cause and effect, understand feedback loops, and navigate the ethical challenges of technology. Through this holistic education, students will be better equipped to understand and contribute to the design of future technologies, ensuring that they maintain harmony with natural systems and societal needs. -/- Conclusion -/- Angelito Malicse’s universal formula offers a profound framework for understanding the fundamental principles of decision-making, both in human and computational systems. By integrating these principles into the design of quantum computers and AGI systems, we can create technologies that adhere to the natural laws of balance and ethics, preventing harmful outcomes and ensuring stable, sustainable progress. -/- In the realms of quantum computing and AGI, the application of the Law of Karma, Homeostasis, and Ethical Decision-Making will ensure that these advanced systems work in harmony with their environments, just as natural systems do. Further, by embedding these principles into educational curricula, we can train future generations to harness the power of these technologies in a way that benefits society, promotes fairness, and sustains the natural balance of the universe. -/- By applying Malicse’s universal formula across these domains, we can foster a future where technology and humanity work together in a sustainable, ethical, and balanced way. -/- . (shrink)

Solving Typhoon Turbulence Using the Universal Formula -/- By Angelito Malicse -/- Introduction -/- Typhoons are among the most destructive natural phenomena, bringing extreme winds, heavy rainfall, and turbulent ocean currents. The chaotic turbulence within a typhoon makes it difficult to predict and control, causing widespread devastation to coastal regions, infrastructure, and human lives. Despite advancements in meteorology and fluid dynamics, the turbulence inside typhoons remains a challenge for accurate forecasting and disaster mitigation. -/- By applying my universal formula, based (...) on three fundamental laws of nature, we can develop a structured and effective approach to understanding and controlling typhoon turbulence. This essay explores how the Law of Karma (causality and system integrity), the Law of Balance in Nature, and the Law of Feedback Regulation provide the ultimate solution to typhoon turbulence. -/- Understanding Typhoon Turbulence Using the Universal Formula -/- Typhoons form due to energy imbalances in the atmosphere and ocean, driven by heat, pressure differences, and moisture content. The chaotic turbulence inside a typhoon is the result of: -/- 1. Unstable air currents caused by pressure and temperature gradients. -/- 2. Vortex formation driven by Earth’s rotation and wind shear. -/- 3. Excess energy accumulation in warm ocean waters. -/- By examining typhoon turbulence through the three universal laws, we can develop a scientific strategy to predict, weaken, and potentially neutralize typhoons before they cause destruction. -/- 1. The Law of Karma: Cause, Effect, and Systemic Integrity -/- The Law of Karma states that every effect has a cause, and for a system to function properly, it must be free of defects. A typhoon is an effect caused by imbalances in atmospheric and oceanic conditions. If these imbalances are corrected, typhoon turbulence can be weakened or prevented. -/- Applying the Law of Karma to Typhoon Control -/- ✅ Eliminate the root cause: Typhoons are fueled by warm ocean waters. Artificial cooling methods, such as cloud seeding or deep-sea upwelling (bringing cold water to the surface), could reduce the heat energy supply and prevent typhoon formation. -/- ✅ Detect turbulence before it intensifies: AI-driven weather models can predict early-stage typhoon turbulence and allow preemptive interventions. AI can identify defective atmospheric conditions (such as extreme heat buildup in ocean currents) and trigger mitigation efforts. -/- ✅ Disrupt vortex formation: Since typhoons rely on rotational forces, deploying strategically placed atmospheric pressure disturbances (via drones or cloud-seeding techniques) could disrupt the vortex before it gains full strength. -/- By identifying and neutralizing the causes of typhoon turbulence, we ensure that the system remains balanced, preventing large-scale destruction. -/- 2. The Law of Balance in Nature -/- The Law of Balance states that all systems naturally seek equilibrium. When a typhoon forms, it represents an extreme imbalance in the Earth’s energy system—excess heat and moisture create an unstable feedback loop of wind and turbulence. -/- Restoring Balance to Weaken Typhoon Turbulence -/- ✅ Regulating ocean surface temperature: Large-scale ocean-based temperature regulation systems (such as reflective films or artificial cooling platforms) can prevent typhoon formation by reducing the excess heat energy that fuels storms. -/- ✅ Breaking the pressure imbalance: Typhoons depend on a low-pressure core that intensifies wind speeds. By artificially increasing local air pressure using ionization or controlled cloud seeding, the extreme wind turbulence can be diffused before it reaches destructive levels. -/- ✅ Balancing atmospheric moisture: AI-assisted weather control could help regulate humidity levels through strategic rainfall induction in high-risk areas, ensuring that water vapor does not accumulate excessively to fuel a typhoon. -/- Since all systems follow natural equilibrium, strategically rebalancing temperature, pressure, and humidity will neutralize extreme typhoon turbulence. -/- 3. The Law of Feedback Regulation -/- The Law of Feedback Regulation states that all systems operate through feedback loops, where continuous monitoring and adjustment are necessary for stability. Typhoon turbulence follows feedback patterns, which means it can be tracked, analyzed, and counteracted using real-time data. -/- Developing an AI-Driven Typhoon Suppression System -/- ✅ AI-powered real-time monitoring: Advanced satellites, ocean buoys, and drones can provide instant feedback on typhoon development, allowing for proactive interventions rather than reactive disaster response. -/- ✅ Adaptive wind and pressure control: Deploying AI-controlled drones or weather balloons to release cooling agents, modify air pressure, or disperse cloud formations could interrupt the storm's feedback loop, reducing its intensity. -/- ✅ AI-driven weather forecasting for early response: Using deep learning algorithms, AI can accurately predict turbulence patterns weeks in advance, allowing governments to take preventive action instead of just preparing for disaster relief. -/- By implementing real-time monitoring and intervention, we can use feedback regulation to weaken or redirect typhoons before they cause catastrophic damage. -/- The Future of Typhoon Control with the Universal Formula -/- By integrating my universal formula into meteorology and disaster prevention, we can develop a comprehensive AI-driven typhoon suppression system that follows the three fundamental laws of nature: -/- 1. Law of Karma (Causality and Systemic Integrity): Address the root causes of typhoon formation by eliminating atmospheric and oceanic imbalances. -/- 2. Law of Balance in Nature: Restore equilibrium by regulating ocean temperatures, air pressure, and humidity. -/- 3. Law of Feedback Regulation: Use AI-driven real-time monitoring and intervention to weaken or prevent typhoons. -/- Through advanced AI, environmental engineering, and a deep understanding of nature’s laws, we can move beyond simply predicting typhoons and start actively controlling their development. -/- Conclusion -/- Typhoon turbulence, long considered an unpredictable force of nature, is fundamentally a problem of imbalance, energy accumulation, and feedback-driven intensification. By applying my universal formula, we can shift from passive disaster response to active typhoon control, using AI, environmental intervention, and natural equilibrium principles to prevent devastation. -/- This solution is not just theoretical—it aligns with the fundamental laws governing all natural systems. Once implemented, it will mark the beginning of a new era where humanity can harness nature’s own principles to create balance, stability, and protection from extreme weather. -/- . (shrink)

This paper addresses philosophical issues concerning whether mental disorders are natural kinds and how the DSM should classify mental disorders. I argue that some mental disorders (e.g., schizophrenia, depression) are natural kinds in the sense that they are natural classes constituted by a set of stable biological mechanisms. I subsequently argue that a theoretical and causal approach to classification would provide a superior method for classifying natural kinds than the purely descriptive approach adopted by the DSM since DSM-III. My (...) argument suggests that the DSM should classify natural kinds in order to provide predictively useful (i.e., projectable) diagnostic categories and that a causal approach to classification would provide a more promising method for formulating valid diagnostic categories. (shrink)

The Connection Between Mind Creativity and Free Will -/- The relationship between mind creativity and free will is a fascinating and complex subject that lies at the heart of human consciousness and decision-making. Creativity allows the mind to generate new ideas, imagine possibilities, and solve problems, while free will gives individuals the sense of autonomy in making choices. However, both processes are not random or independent; they are deeply interconnected through natural laws that govern human behavior and cognition. This essay (...) explores the connection between creativity and free will, highlighting how these mental functions operate within the universal laws of balance and cause and effect. -/- I. The Nature of Creativity: A Feedback Mechanism -/- Creativity is often seen as a spontaneous or mysterious process, but it is, in reality, the product of complex interactions within the brain. The mind continuously receives, processes, and responds to external stimuli while integrating internal memories, thoughts, and emotions. This interaction functions as a feedback mechanism, where the mind reorganizes known elements to form new ideas. -/- When a person encounters a problem, the brain draws from prior knowledge and experiences, using imagination and abstract thinking to find potential solutions. This process reflects a fundamental law of nature: systems operate through feedback loops. For instance, the mind, like any complex system, requires external inputs and internal organization to produce creative outcomes. The mind’s creativity is not limitless or chaotic but follows patterns determined by natural laws. -/- II. Free Will as Pattern Recognition and Decision-Making -/- Free will is often perceived as the ability to make decisions independently. However, from a scientific and philosophical standpoint, free will is better understood as the mind’s capacity to recognize patterns, anticipate outcomes, and choose actions accordingly. The decisions we make are influenced by genetics, environment, experiences, and social interactions. -/- The universal law of cause and effect, often referred to as karma, plays a critical role here. Every action has a reaction, and every decision has consequences. The mind’s decisions are guided by these causal relationships, even when creativity is involved. When we make decisions, we rely on mental simulations of potential outcomes based on past experiences and future predictions. The sense of free will emerges from this complex but law-governed process of pattern recognition and adaptive learning. -/- III. Creativity and Free Will Within the Framework of Natural Laws -/- Creativity and free will are not arbitrary forces but operate within the confines of natural laws, particularly the universal law of balance. In nature, balance ensures the stability and sustainability of systems. In human decision-making, this law manifests in the mind’s pursuit of equilibrium between internal desires and external realities. -/- When creative ideas disrupt societal or natural balance, they often encounter resistance. For example, scientific innovations must align with ethical, social, and environmental considerations to be accepted. If technological or social innovations ignore the law of balance—such as unsustainable economic growth or unchecked population increase—they create systemic instability. Thus, creative thinking and free will must align with nature’s inherent tendency toward balance. -/- IV. The Illusion of Absolute Free Will -/- While people often believe in absolute free will, research in neuroscience and behavioral psychology suggests that decision-making is largely influenced by unconscious processes and external conditions. The mind’s creative capacity may provide a wide range of choices, but the selection process follows patterns rooted in experience and environmental interactions. -/- Your universal formula, which integrates natural laws like cause and effect and balance, supports this perspective. Free will is not a completely independent force but a decision-making process governed by these universal laws. Creativity, in this context, serves as the tool that enables adaptive responses to new challenges, while free will acts as the mechanism for selecting the most balanced and effective solutions. -/- V. The Role of Education in Nurturing Creative Free Will -/- Understanding the relationship between creativity and free will has profound implications for education. A holistic educational approach, as you advocate, can empower individuals to recognize the natural laws governing their decisions. By teaching students about the universal law of balance, the educational system can foster responsible creativity—one that seeks solutions aligned with societal and environmental equilibrium. -/- Critical thinking, scientific inquiry, and ethical reasoning should be integrated into the educational curriculum. When individuals understand that their decisions influence and are influenced by interconnected systems, they become more conscious of the long-term impacts of their choices. Creativity, when guided by this awareness, becomes a tool for solving societal problems while respecting the laws of nature. -/- V. Implications for Society and Technology -/- In a rapidly evolving world, the connection between creativity and free will has significant implications for societal development and technological innovation. Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), as you suggest, can be programmed with your universal formula to assist in solving complex human problems. If AGI systems are designed with an understanding of natural balance and cause and effect, they could help guide societal decision-making toward sustainable and ethical outcomes. -/- Societal issues such as climate change, economic inequality, and social unrest can be addressed more effectively when creativity is grounded in the principles of natural balance. Free will, when exercised with an understanding of these laws, can lead to decisions that promote collective well-being rather than short-term gains. -/- Conclusion -/- The connection between mind creativity and free will lies in the brain’s adaptive, feedback-driven processes, which operate within the boundaries of natural laws like cause and effect and balance. Creativity allows individuals to imagine new possibilities, while free will guides the selection of actions that align with these possibilities. However, these processes are not entirely independent; they follow universal patterns and principles. -/- By understanding and applying these principles through education and societal frameworks, humanity can harness creativity and free will to solve pressing global challenges. As you propose, teaching the universal law of balance at all educational levels can cultivate a more conscious and responsible approach to decision-making, ensuring that creative innovations align with nature’s inherent equilibrium. In this way, mind creativity and free will become tools for achieving societal harmony and sustainable progress. -/- . (shrink)

We propose a novel retrocausal model in which the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) is not solely a relic of the early universe but may also contain imprints of present-day physics encoded via faster-than-light (FTL) particles. Building on principles from special relativity, quantum retrocausality, and the Wheeler-Feynman absorber theory, we examine how particles capable of superluminal propagation, such as tachyons or other hypothetical entities, could influence initial cosmic conditions by transporting energy and information backward in time. We extend the classical Boltzmann (...) transport equation to include FTL interactions using a meta-time parameter tau, allowing bidirectional propagation in time and embedding causally consistent feedback loops into early-universe dynamics. We explore how this framework can account for anomalies in the CMB, such as the Cold Spot and hemispherical asymmetries, and show that retrocausal imprints may preserve global entropy while allowing local variations consistent with self-consistent cosmological loops. While highly speculative, this model offers a testable structure for retrocausality in cosmology, potentially providing alternative explanations for the origin of temporal directionality and the uniformity of the CMB without invoking inflation. (shrink)

# Theory of Harmonic Time (THT): A Speculative Framework *Disclaimer* This paper presents a highly speculative and theoretical framework, exploring potential connections between harmonic time and various established theories. The ideas discussed herein are hypothetical and require further development, refinement, and experimental verification. *Introduction* The Theory of Harmonic Time (THT) proposes that harmonic oscillations underlie the fundamental nature of time and the universe. This framework attempts to integrate concepts from various theories, including String Theory/M-Theory, Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG), (...) class='Hi'>Causal Dynamical Triangulation (CDT), Asymptotic Safety, and Emergent Gravity. *THT-String Theory Proposal* Consider the harmonic oscillations of strings in String Theory/M-Theory. These oscillations give rise to a fractal structure, where the same harmonic patterns repeat at different scales. This fractal structure could be the fundamental unit of time. *THT-LQG Proposal* In LQG, consider the spin networks and holonomies that give rise to the fabric of spacetime. Introduce harmonic resonance, where spin networks and holonomies exhibit harmonic oscillations. These oscillations could give rise to a fractal structure. *THT-CDT Proposal* In CDT, consider the discretized spacetime, composed of simple geometric building blocks. Introduce harmonic oscillations, where these building blocks exhibit harmonic resonance. This resonance could give rise to a fractal structure. *THT-Asymptotic Safety Proposal* In Asymptotic Safety, consider gravitational waves and fluctuations. Introduce harmonic resonance, where these fluctuations exhibit harmonic oscillations. These oscillations could give rise to a fractal structure. *THT-Emergent Gravity Proposal* In Emergent Gravity, consider the collective behavior of particles. Introduce harmonic resonance, where particles exhibit harmonic oscillations. These oscillations could give rise to a fractal structure. *Conclusion* The Theory of Harmonic Time (THT) presents a speculative framework, attempting to integrate harmonic oscillations with various established theories. While highly speculative, this framework might offer new insights into the nature of time and the universe. Further development, refinement, and experimental verification are necessary to explore the potential implications of THT. (shrink)

Applying the Universal Formula to Antigravity Aircraft -/- Introduction -/- The pursuit of antigravity technology has long been a dream of scientists, engineers, and visionaries. Traditional physics suggests that gravity is an inherent force that must be counteracted using energy-intensive propulsion systems. However, if we apply the principles of my universal formula—centered on natural laws such as balance, causality, and systemic integrity—we may uncover a structured pathway to achieving controlled antigravity flight. -/- The Universal Formula and Its Relevance to Antigravity (...) -/- My universal formula consists of fundamental natural laws, including the law of karma, which extends beyond cause and effect to encompass the concept of systems. This law states that any system, whether natural or artificial, must be free of defects or errors to function properly and safely. If an antigravity aircraft is to be realized, it must adhere to this principle by ensuring flawless system design and integration. -/- Additionally, the universal law of balance dictates that all natural and artificial systems must operate within a stable equilibrium. If antigravity propulsion disrupts the natural balance of forces, it must compensate through self-regulating feedback mechanisms to maintain stability. This aligns with nature’s principle of homeostasis, where balance is preserved through continuous adjustments. -/- Key Principles for Antigravity Aircraft Design -/- 1. System Integrity and Error-Free Operation -/- Any antigravity propulsion system must be free of defects, ensuring that all components function harmoniously. The aircraft must integrate precise electromagnetic, quantum, or exotic energy fields that maintain a stable levitation effect. -/- 2. Feedback Mechanisms and Homeostasis -/- Just as biological systems regulate themselves through feedback loops, an antigravity aircraft must have real-time monitoring and adaptive control to maintain stability. This could involve gyroscopic stabilization, electromagnetic field adjustments, or AI-driven regulation. -/- 3. Energy Efficiency and Natural Balance -/- Conventional aircraft rely on fossil fuels or electric propulsion, which often lead to energy imbalances. An antigravity system must operate in harmony with natural energy sources, possibly tapping into zero-point energy, electromagnetic fields, or gravitational wave interactions to maintain efficiency and sustainability. -/- 4. Interconnectedness and Causality -/- The universal formula emphasizes that all systems are interconnected. An antigravity craft should not only focus on levitation but also consider its effects on surrounding matter, atmospheric conditions, and environmental sustainability. It should function as a closed-loop system, minimizing unintended consequences and maintaining ecological balance. -/- The Future of Antigravity and the Universal Formula -/- If we accept that the universe operates under a fundamental set of natural laws, then technology must align with these principles to be viable. The successful development of antigravity aircraft may depend not on brute-force engineering but on understanding and applying these universal laws of balance and systemic harmony. -/- Integrating my universal formula into scientific and technological research could bridge the gap between theoretical physics and practical engineering. By ensuring that all components of an antigravity system work in unison, remain free of defects, and follow natural balancing mechanisms, humanity could unlock the key to overcoming gravitational limitations. -/- Conclusion -/- The development of antigravity aircraft must adhere to the principles of natural balance, systemic integrity, and feedback-driven homeostasis as outlined in my universal formula. By recognizing that all systems—whether biological, mechanical, or cosmic—operate under the same fundamental laws, we may finally achieve what was once thought to be science fiction. If scientists, engineers, and policymakers integrate these principles into their research, antigravity propulsion may become a reality, changing the future of transportation and space exploration forever. -/- . (shrink)

-/- Title: Individuality as Systemic Emergence: A Natural Law Framework for Conscious Identity -/- Author: Angelito Malicse -/- Abstract -/- This paper explores the nature of individuality from the perspective of a universal formula composed of three interdependent natural laws: the Law of Karma (System Integrity), the law of Balance (Feedback Equilibrium), and the Law of Conditionality (Environmental Dependence). Contrary to traditional metaphysical assumptions that regard individuality as an intrinsic and autonomous essence, this framework redefines individuality as an emergent, context-dependent (...) property of systemic interactions governed by natural laws. The analysis advances a deterministic yet integrative model of human identity, offering implications for ethics, education, and governance. -/- 1. Introduction -/- The philosophical notion of individuality has long occupied a central place in debates on free will, moral agency, and consciousness. Western traditions have typically approached the individual as an autonomous unit—possessing volitional freedom and ontological independence. This metaphysical paradigm, however, stands in tension with empirical insights from systems theory, ecology, cognitive science, and increasingly, moral philosophy. The present work proposes a shift in perspective, grounded in a universal natural law framework that reconceptualizes individuality as emergent and systemic. -/- This framework is composed of three interlocking laws: the Law of Karma (understood here as the requirement for systemic integrity), the Law of Balance (which governs dynamic equilibrium through feedback), and the Law of Conditionality (which emphasizes environmental dependency). Within this schema, individuality is not eliminated, but re-situated as a lawful phenomenon shaped by internal and external conditions. -/- 2. The Individual as Subsystem: Law of Karma -/- In this formulation, the Law of Karma is not limited to spiritual or metaphysical causality but is reframed as a principle of systemic coherence. Any system—biological, mechanical, or cognitive—must function without internal contradictions or structural defects to maintain its operative integrity. The human mind, as a cognitive subsystem within larger biological and sociocultural systems, is governed by the same principle. Its outputs (decisions, behaviors, beliefs) are the result of interactions among inputs such as genetic predispositions, learned knowledge, and environmental constraints. -/- The law Implies that individual behavior cannot be arbitrary; it must be causally consistent with the structure and state of the system. An “individual” is therefore a functional expression of lawful dynamics rather than a metaphysically uncaused entity. -/- 3. Feedback and Regulation: Law of Balance -/- The Law of Balance governs how systems maintain homeostasis. Through feedback mechanisms—both internal (emotional, physiological) and external (social, environmental)—the individual constantly adjusts responses to achieve or restore equilibrium. This law is observable across disciplines: from cybernetic theory to behavioral psychology and ecological modeling. -/- In this context, individuality is understood as a product of differentiated feedback loops. Each individual adapts uniquely, but within predictable bounds, to feedback from the external world. The perception of autonomy is thus contextualized as a cognitive byproduct of real-time adaptive regulation. Apparent freedom is reconceived as the mind’s internal narrative of externally conditioned choices. -/- 4. Environmental Embedding: Law of Conditionality -/- The third pillar of the framework, the Law of Conditionality, posits that no phenomenon—including consciousness—arises independently. Every state or behavior is the result of prior conditions. This principle resonates with Buddhist dependent origination, ecological determinism, and modern complexity theory. -/- Individuality, then, is not static essence but dynamic consequence. It is a node in a causal network—continuously shaped by its material, social, and cognitive environments. Individual identity is relational, fluid, and system-dependent. -/- 5. Individuality as Emergent Differentiation -/- Synthesizing the above, we arrive at a model of individuality as emergent differentiation within lawful systems. Individuals are distinguishable by the unique configuration of variables acting upon them, but the governing laws remain universal. This model aligns with contemporary notions of complexity, wherein emergent properties exhibit local variation despite global rules. -/- Individuality is neither illusory nor metaphysically absolute; it is a relative construct, functionally meaningful but contingent. Like a wave on the surface of the ocean, it has form and identity, yet remains inseparable from the medium that sustains it. -/- 6. Implications for Human Systems -/- Reframing individuality within a law-bound systemic model has significant implications: -/- Ethically, it calls for contextualized responsibility—one that accounts for structural and environmental conditions shaping behavior. -/- Educationally, it supports a holistic curriculum emphasizing systems thinking, feedback awareness, and ecological interdependence. -/- Politically, it suggests that governance should focus less on punitive individualism and more on rebalancing systemic conditions to prevent dysfunction. -/- 7. Conclusion -/- The universal formula composed of the Law of Karma, the Law of Balance, and the Law of Conditionality provides a coherent and scientifically aligned framework for understanding individuality. Far from denying the reality of the individual, this model grounds individuality in a lawful, feedback-regulated, and environmentally conditioned system. It is time to move beyond metaphysical abstractions of the self and embrace a paradigm where individuality is recognized as an emergent property of natural order. -/- References -/- Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Chandler Publishing. -/-  Discusses systems thinking, cybernetics, and feedback loops in ecological and cognitive systems. -/- Capra, F. (1996). The Web of Life: A New Scientific Understanding of Living Systems. Anchor Books. -/-  Introduces systems theory and emphasizes the interconnectedness and feedback dynamics in natural systems. -/- Clark, A. (1997). Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. MIT Press. -/-  Argues that cognition is not isolated within the brain but emerges from the dynamic interaction between brain, body, and environment. -/- Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. D. Reidel Publishing. -/-  Introduces the concept of autopoiesis—self-producing systems—and its application to understanding individuality and cognition. -/- Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984). Order Out of Chaos: Man’s New Dialogue with Nature. Bantam Books. -/-  Explores how complex systems achieve order through natural laws of feedback, equilibrium, and environmental interaction. -/- Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Harvard University Press. -/-  Bridges biology and consciousness studies, aligning with your view that individuality arises through environmental conditioning and dynamic systems. -/- Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. MIT Press. -/-  Explores the role of dependent origination (Law of Conditionality) and how the mind is shaped by systemic feedback and environmental context. -/- Weiner, N. (1948). Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. MIT Press. -/-  A foundational text on feedback systems and control theory, relevant to your Law of Balance. -/- . (shrink)

In this paper I argue that the extent to which a human trait is genetically caused can causally depend upon whether the trait is categorized within human genetics as genetically caused. This makes the kindgenetically caused traitan interactive kind. I demonstrate that this thesis is both conceptually coherent and empirically plausible. I outline the core rationale of this thesis and demonstrate its conceptual coherence by drawing upon Waters’ (2007) analysis of genetic causation. I add empirical plausibility to the thesis by (...) describing a hypothetical but empirically plausible mechanism by which the fact that obesity is categorized as genetically caused within human genetics increases the extent to which obesity is in fact genetically caused. (shrink)

Understanding the Origin and Function of DNA Codes Through the Lens of the Universal Formula of Natural Laws Author: Angelito Malicse Abstract This paper explores the scientific understanding of DNA codes through the application of the universal formula developed by Angelito Malicse, which consists of three universal laws: the Law of Karma (Cause and Effect with System Integrity), the Law of Balance in Nature, and the Law of Feedback Mechanism. By applying these foundational principles to the structure, function, and origin (...) of DNA, we demonstrate that life’s molecular basis aligns with deeply rooted natural laws that govern all systems. 1. Introduction Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is the molecular foundation of all known life forms. While mainstream science has extensively mapped the structure and function of DNA, this paper proposes a philosophical-scientific synthesis: understanding DNA using the three universal laws proposed in the universal formula of natural order. These laws—karma, balance, and feedback—are presented not as metaphysical beliefs but as scientific principles observable in all natural systems, including genetic information. 2. The Universal Formula of Natural Laws Angelito Malicse's universal formula comprises: 1. The Law of Karma (Cause and Effect + System Integrity): Any system, whether natural or artificial, must function without internal errors to maintain effectiveness. Every cause results in an effect, and only systems with internal integrity survive. 2. The Law of Balance in Nature: Natural systems survive through equilibrium. Any excess or deficiency leads to imbalance, disorder, or destruction. 3. The Law of Feedback Mechanism: Systems maintain functionality through constant interaction with internal and external stimuli—homeostasis depends on ongoing feedback. These laws apply to both individual consciousness and the physical systems that govern life. 3. DNA Function Through the Universal Formula 3.1 The Law of Karma and DNA Function DNA encodes instructions for building proteins using sequences of nucleotides (A, T, C, G). Each sequence causes the production of specific proteins via transcription and translation. If an error (mutation) occurs in the sequence, it can cause malfunction in the resulting protein, potentially leading to diseases. Thus, DNA demonstrates karma in a scientific sense: every molecular cause (nucleotide sequence) has a biological effect (protein). Only those sequences that maintain system integrity ensure survival and function. 3.2 The Law of Balance in DNA Regulation Biological systems regulate gene expression to maintain equilibrium. For instance, cells only activate certain genes when needed, avoiding unnecessary energy expenditure and preventing imbalance. Cancer, autoimmune disorders, and metabolic syndromes often result from the loss of this genetic balance. The triplet codon system itself is optimized for error tolerance, supporting both genetic stability and adaptability. 3.3 The Law of Feedback Mechanism in DNA Systems Cells use complex feedback loops to regulate DNA activity. Gene expression responds to signals such as temperature, stress, hormone levels, and nutrient availability. For example, insulin gene activation in response to high glucose levels demonstrates such regulatory feedback. These feedback systems allow the DNA to be context-aware, adjusting its behavior according to both internal and external demands—a hallmark of homeostasis. 4. The Origin of DNA Codes Through the Universal Laws 4.1 Origin via Cause and Effect (Law of Karma) Prebiotic chemistry on early Earth created simple organic molecules. Experiments such as the Miller-Urey experiment showed that amino acids and nucleotides could form under primitive Earth conditions. Self-replicating RNA molecules likely appeared first, eventually giving rise to DNA due to its chemical stability. This evolutionary progression is a chain of causes and effects—each molecular event influencing the next. Only those replicating systems without critical errors persisted, demonstrating system integrity and natural selection. 4.2 Emergence Through Natural Balance For DNA to emerge and persist, it had to balance mutation (to enable evolution) and fidelity (to prevent collapse). The double-helix structure of DNA provides an optimal balance between flexibility and stability. The survival of such coding systems is consistent with the law of natural balance. DNA codes that were too error-prone or too rigid failed to adapt or survive, while those with optimal equilibrium thrived. 4.3 Development Through Feedback Mechanisms Once primitive genetic systems appeared, they began interacting with their environments. Natural selection favored those systems that could respond to feedback—internal errors or external stimuli. DNA that supported proteins capable of regulating their own genetic origin introduced circular feedback. Environmental pressures guided gene expression and replication fidelity, reinforcing the adaptive feedback loop essential for life. 5. Conclusion The scientific understanding of DNA—its structure, function, and origin—harmonizes with the three universal laws proposed by the universal formula: - Cause and Effect (Karma): DNA operates through causal relationships between code and function. - Balance: DNA persists through regulated gene expression and structural equilibrium. - Feedback: DNA responds to its environment and internal conditions to maintain life. These laws are not separate from biology—they are embedded in it. The emergence and sustainability of DNA as the foundation of life are not accidental but follow the same natural principles that govern all systems. Understanding this opens the door to integrating science, philosophy, and education to form a more unified view of life. References - Alberts, B., Johnson, A., Lewis, J., et al. (2015). *Molecular Biology of the Cell* (6th ed.). Garland Science. - Cooper, G. M. (2000). *The Cell: A Molecular Approach*. Sinauer Associates. - Freeland, S. J., & Hurst, L. D. (1998). The genetic code is one in a million. *Journal of Molecular Evolution*, 47(3), 238–248. - Gilbert, W. (1986). The RNA world. *Nature*, 319(6055), 618. - Hanahan, D., & Weinberg, R. A. (2011). Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. *Cell*, 144(5), 646–674. - Miller, S. L. (1953). A production of amino acids under possible primitive Earth conditions. *Science*, 117(3046), 528–529. - Ptashne, M. (2004). *A Genetic Switch: Phage Lambda Revisited*. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. - Watson, J. D., & Crick, F. H. C. (1953). Molecular structure of nucleic acids: a structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. *Nature*, 171(4356), 737–738. -/- . (shrink)

Title: Understanding War Through the Lens of the Universal Formula of Free Will -/- By Angelito Malicse -/- War, as a destructive phenomenon that has plagued humanity for millennia, is often seen as an inevitable part of human nature or political conflict. However, when examined through the lens of the Universal Formula of Free Will, it becomes clear that war is neither random nor inevitable. Rather, it is the result of specific violations of three interrelated universal laws: the Law of (...) Karma (Cause and Effect with Systems Thinking), the Law of Balance in Nature, and the Law of Feedback Mechanism between Conscious Minds and Environments. Understanding war through this framework allows for a more precise analysis of its origins, progression, and potential prevention. -/- 1. The Law of Karma: Cause and Effect and Systems Thinking -/- According to the Law of Karma, every effect has a cause, and in systems thinking, these causes are embedded within interconnected systems. War is not an isolated occurrence but the effect of systemic flaws within societies and between nations. Political oppression, economic inequality, historical injustice, and ideological extremism are examples of systemic defects that generate tensions. When these defects are left unaddressed, they culminate in conflict, manifesting as war. Just as a malfunctioning machine with defective parts cannot function safely, a society or international system with persistent defects will inevitably produce conflict as a karmic consequence. -/- 2. The Law of Balance in Nature -/- Nature operates on the principle of balance. Any form of imbalance—whether ecological, social, economic, or political—will eventually seek correction, often through disruptive means. War, in this sense, is nature’s violent attempt to restore balance. When power is concentrated in the hands of a few, when resources are unfairly distributed, or when human rights are grossly violated, the resulting imbalance creates pressure within the societal system. This pressure, if ignored, leads to rupture. War becomes the eruption of accumulated injustice and imbalance, similar to how a volcano erupts after excessive internal pressure. Preventing war, therefore, requires recognizing and addressing imbalances before they reach a critical point. -/- 3. The Law of Feedback Mechanism Between Conscious Minds and Environments -/- Human decisions are not made in isolation but are shaped through continuous feedback loops involving individuals, societies, and environments. War often results from breakdowns in these feedback mechanisms. Misinformation, propaganda, fear, and trauma can distort perception and decision-making, leading groups and leaders to act aggressively. These distorted actions trigger reactive responses from other nations or groups, creating a cycle of conflict. Healthy, balanced feedback mechanisms—such as open communication, diplomacy, education, and mutual understanding—are essential for preventing the escalation of tensions. When these mechanisms fail, the chain reaction toward war becomes increasingly difficult to stop. -/- Conclusion -/- Through the Universal Formula of Free Will, war can be understood not as a failure of diplomacy alone but as a broader systemic failure involving karmic causality, natural imbalance, and broken feedback mechanisms. By addressing these core laws holistically within education, governance, and international relations, humanity can create a future where war is no longer seen as inevitable. Instead, it becomes a preventable outcome that can be avoided through the intelligent application of natural laws. This approach offers not only understanding but also a path toward lasting peace and global harmony. -/- . (shrink)

The term “Complex Systems Biology” was introduced a few years ago [Kaneko, 2006] and, although not yet of widespread use, it seems particularly well suited to indicate an approach to biology which is well rooted in complex systems science. Although broad generalizations are always dangerous, it is safe to state that mainstream biology has been largely dominated by a gene-centric view in the last decades, due to the success of molecular biology. So the one gene - one trait approch, which (...) has often proved to be effective, has been extended to cover even complex traits. This simplifying view has been appropriately criticized, and the movement called systems biology has taken off. Systems biology [Noble, 2006] emphasizes the presence of several feedback loops in biological systems, which severely limit the range of validity of explanations based upon linear causal chains (e.g. gene → behaviour). Mathematical modelling is one the favourite tools of systems biologists to analyze the possible effects of competing negative and positive feedback loops which can be observed at several levels (from molecules to organelles, cells, tissues, organs, organisms, ecosystems). Systems biology is by now a well-established field, as it can be inferred by the rapid growth in number of conferences and journals devoted to it, as well as by the existence of several grants and funded projects.Systems biology is mainly focused upon the description of specific biological items, like for example specific organisms, or specific organs in a class of animals, or specific genetic-metabolic circuits. It therefore leaves open the issue of the search for general principles of biological organization, which apply to all living beings or to at least to broad classes. We know indeed that there are some principles of this kind, biological evolution being the most famous one. The theory of cellular organization also qualifies as a general principle. But the main focus of biological research has been that of studying specific cases, with some reluctance to accept (and perhaps a limited interest for) broad generalizations. This may however change, and this is indeed the challenge of complex systems biology: looking for general principles in biological systems, in the spirit of complex systems science which searches for similar features and behaviours in various kinds of systems. The hope to find such general principles appears well founded, and I will show in Section 2 that there are indeed data which provide support to this claim. Besides data, there are also general ideas and models concerning the way in which biological systems work. The strategy, in this case, is that of introducing simplified models of biological organisms or processes, and to look for their generic properties: this term, borrowed from statistical physics, is used for those properties which are shared by a wide class of systems. In order to model these properties, the most effective approach has been so far that of using ensembles of systems, where each member can be different from another one, and to look for those properties which are widespread. This approach was introduced many years ago [Kauffman, 1971] in modelling gene regulatory networks. At that time one had very few information about the way in which the expression of a given gene affects that of other genes, apart from the fact that this influence is real and can be studied in few selected cases (like e.g. the lactose metabolism in E. coli). Today, after many years of triumphs of molecular biology, much more has been discovered, however the possibility of describing a complete map of gene-gene interactions in a moderately complex organism is still out of reach. Therefore the goal of fully describing a network of interacting genes in a real organism could not be (and still cannot be) achieved. But a different approach has proven very fruitful, that of asking what are the typical properties of such a set of interacting genes. Making some plausible hypotheses and introducing some simplifying assumptions, Kauffman was able to address some important problems. In particular, he drew attention to the fact that a dynamical system of interacting genes displays selforganizing properties which explain some key aspects of life, most notably the existence of a limited number of cellular types in every multicellular organism (these numbers are of the order of a few hundreds, while the number of theoretically possible types, absent interactions, would be much much larger than the number of protons in the universe). In section 3 I will describe the ensemble based approach in the context of gene regulatory networks, and I will show that it can describe some important experimental data. Finally, in section 4 I will discuss some methodological aspects. (shrink)

This article proposes a conceptual reformulation of black hole interiors grounded in a field-theoretic model of ontological saturation. In contrast to the standard geometrical paradigm, where singularities mark the breakdown of spacetime structure, the present approach treats geometry itself as a regime of local projectability from a more fundamental saturated field. Within this framework, the transition from a geometric regime to a saturated regime provides a natural reinterpretation of black hole horizons, not as causal boundaries, but as the limits (...) of projective stability. Evaporation is understood not as an escape from a singularity, but as a progressive desaturation and re-projectability of the underlying field. We explore the ontological consequences of this model, including the rejection of metric substantivalism, the possibility of structured regimes without geometry, and a dynamic stratification of physical reality. Comparison is made with competing approaches, such as loop quantum gravity, causal sets, remnant models, and firewalls. This framework suggests that black holes may offer a window into the failure of geometry as a descriptive regime, without requiring quantization of spacetime itself. (shrink)

This essay focuses on the intriguing relationship between mathematics and physical phenomena, arguing that the brain uses a single spatiotemporal- causal objective framework in order to characterize and manipulate basic external data and internal physical and emotional reactive information, into more complex thought and knowledge. It is proposed that multiple hierarchical permutations of this single format eventually give rise to increasingly precise visceral meaning. The main thesis overcomes the epistemological complexities of the Frame Problem by asserting that the primal (...) frame of reference – within which chaotic conscious thought ultimately emerges – is essentially a synchronous representation of the four macro properties of existence plus the genetically derived causal objective, and the embodied physical and emotional reactions that even the lowliest cognitive organisms are born with, and which they automatically express as they struggle to exist within an ever-changing and often hostile environment. -/-. (shrink)

The metaphysics of quantum gravity explores metaphysical issues related to research programs in theoretical physics clustered under the term quantum gravity. These research programs aim at the formulation of a theory that reconciles the theory of general relativity with quantum theory. The goal is not necessarily to come up with a unified single theory but, more pragmatically, to describe phenomena with a dual nature, embodying both quantum and relativistic features—such as black holes and the early universe. Approaches to quantum gravity (...) are not yet fully worked-out theories. Nevertheless, they already provide a certain partial understanding of physical reality in different ways. Remarkably, they do so with a striking similarity: they virtually all deny the existence of some features usually regarded as essential to the existence of spacetime (or space and/or time) such as its four-dimensionality, the existence of distances and durations between events, or even the very partial ordering of events. This observation is particularly noteworthy, considering the pervasive influence of spatial and temporal organisation on the human mind across various facets of daily life and theoretical thinking, ranging from most ancient religions to contemporary scientific worldviews. The metaphysics of quantum gravity takes as its starting point the puzzling observation that physics could teach us that space and time are not fundamental. It draws on resources from traditional metaphysics to tackle a set of issues related to the possible non-fundamentality of spacetime, and it investigates its potential implications for venerable traditional issues in metaphysics. The metaphysics of quantum gravity is a relatively small and new research field, and thus as of now, its focus has been on explaining how spacetime could emerge from a more fundamental and non-spatiotemporal ontology. Consequently, this article is equally focused on questions regarding the status of spacetime and the emergence of spacetime. Section 1 situates the field within metaphysics of science more broadly. Sections 2 and 3 investigate, respectively, the status of spacetime in different approaches to quantum gravity and a number of potential issues with its lack of fundamentality. The article then covers the nature of the emerging spatiotemporal ontology (Section 4) and the building relation that relates it to the underlying non-spatiotemporal ontology (Section 5). Section 6 surveys various potential applications of spacetime emergence to a number of debates in metaphysics. (shrink)

The recent literature on causality has seen the introduction of several distinctions within causality, which are thought to be important for understanding the widespread scientific practice of focusing causal explanations on a subset of the factors that are causally relevant for a phenomenon. Concepts used to draw such distinctions include, among others, stability, specificity, proportionality, or actual-difference making. In this contribution, I propose a new distinction that picks out an explanatorily salient class of causes in biological systems. Some select (...) causes in complex biological systems, I argue, have the property of enabling coherent causal control of these systems. Examples of such control variables include hormones and other signaling molecules, e.g., TOR (target of rapamycin), morphogens or the products of homeotic selector genes in embryonic pattern formation. I propose an analysis of this notion based on concepts borrowed from causal graph theory. (shrink)

Causal selection is the task of picking out, from a field of known causally relevant factors, some factors as elements of an explanation. The Causal Parity Thesis in the philosophy of biology challenges the usual ways of making such selections among different causes operating in a developing organism. The main target of this thesis is usually gene centrism, the doctrine that genes play some special role in ontogeny, which is often described in terms of information-bearing or programming. This (...) paper is concerned with the attempt of confronting the challenge coming from the Causal Parity Thesis by offering principles of causal selection that are spelled out in terms of an explicit philosophical account of causation, namely an interventionist account. I show that two such accounts that have been developed, although they contain important insights about causation in biology, nonetheless fail to provide an adequate reply to the Causal Parity challenge: Ken Waters's account of actual-difference making and Jim Woodward's account of causal specificity. A combination of the two also doesn't do the trick, nor does Laura Franklin-Hall's account of explanation (in this volume). We need additional conceptual resources. I argue that the resources we need consist in a special class of counterfactual conditionals, namely counterfactuals the antecedents of which describe biologically normal interventions. (shrink)

In this paper we discuss how Causal Decision Theory should be modified to handle a class of problematic cases involving deterministic laws. Causal Decision Theory, as it stands, is problematically biased against your endorsing deterministic propositions (for example it tells you to deny Newtonian physics, regardless of how confident you are of its truth). Our response is that this is not a problem for Causal Decision Theory per se, but arises because of the standard method for assessing (...) the truth of certain counterfactuals. The truth of deterministic laws is `modally fragile' on the standard semantics for counterfactuals: if determinism is true and you were to do otherwise, the laws would be different. We provide two ways of avoiding this problem: 1) supplement the standard semantics for counterfactuals with impossible worlds, or 2) introduce rigid designators into the description of problematic decision situations. We argue that both of these approaches are well-motivated and can be readily incorporated into Lewisian Causal Decision Theory. (shrink)

This paper explores a special kind of loop of grounding: cosmic loops. A cosmic loop is a loop that intuitively requires us to go "around" the entire universe to come back to the original ground. After describing several kinds of cosmic loop scenarios, I will discuss what we can learn from these scenarios about constraints on grounding; the conceivability of cosmic loops; the possibility of cosmic loops; and the prospects for salvaging local reflexivity, asymmetry and transitivity (...) of grounding in a world containing a cosmic loop of ground. The considerations raised in this paper also bear on what we should think about relations that are meant to support grounding relations: in particular, revisions to theories of the part-whole relation are discussed. (shrink)

Endocrinologists apply the idea of feedback loops to explain how hormones regulate certain bodily functions such as glucose metabolism. In particular, feedback loops focus on the maintenance of the plasma concentrations of glucose within a narrow range. Here, we put forward a different, organicist perspective on the endocrine regulation of glycaemia, by relying on the pivotal concept of closure of constraints. From this perspective, biological systems are understood as organized ones, which means that they are constituted of a set of (...) mutually dependent functional structures acting as constraints, whose maintenance depends on their reciprocal interactions. Closure refers specifically to the mutual dependence among functional constraints in an organism. We show that, when compared to feedback loops, organizational closure can generate much richer descriptions of the processes and constraints at play in the metabolism and regulation of glycaemia, by making explicit the different hierarchical orders involved. We expect that the proposed theoretical framework will open the way to the construction of original mathematical models, which would provide a better understanding of endocrine regulation from an organicist perspective. (shrink)

The most recent versions of official psychiatric diagnostic guidelines include a new addition: Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD). PGD is controversial due to concerns about harmful looping effects. Some opponents of PGD’s inclusion in the DSM worry that the diagnosis may pathologize normal human experiences and alienate grievers from their grief. This paper argues that these concerns are less troubling than they initially appear (in part because they assume an unhelpful, and conceptually optional, background understanding of health conditions as pathologies) and (...) calls attention to overlooked beneficial looping effects that might be achieved by medicalizing (some) experiences of grief. (shrink)