- The AGM theory and inconsistent belief change.Koji Tanaka - 2005 - Logique Et Analyse 48 (189-192):113-150.details
|
|
AGM 25 Years: Twenty-Five Years of Research in Belief Change.Eduardo Fermé & Sven Ove Hansson - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 40 (2):295 - 331.details
|
|
Semi-Contraction: Axioms and Construction.Eduardo Fermé & Ricardo Rodriguez - 1998 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 39 (3):332-345.details
|
|
Preference-based belief revision for rule-based agents.Natasha Alechina, Mark Jago & Brian Logan - 2008 - Synthese 165 (2):159-177.details
|
|
Refined epistemic entrenchment.Thomas Andreas Meyer, Willem Adrian Labuschagne & Johannes Heidema - 2000 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 9 (2):237-259.details
|
|
Systematic withdrawal.Thomas Meyer, Johannes Heidema, Willem Labuschagne & Louise Leenen - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (5):415-443.details
|
|
A survey of multiple contractions.André Fuhrmann & Sven Ove Hansson - 1994 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 3 (1):39-75.details
|
|
On the logic of theory change: Contraction without recovery. [REVIEW]Eduardo L. Fermé - 1998 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7 (2):127-137.details
|
|
On the Degeneracy of the Full AGM-Theory of Theory-Revision.Neil Tennant - 2006 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (2):661 - 676.details
|
|
Foundational belief change.Abhaya C. Nayak - 1994 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 23 (5):495 - 533.details
|
|
Efficient multi-agent epistemic planning: Teaching planners about nested belief.Christian Muise, Vaishak Belle, Paolo Felli, Sheila McIlraith, Tim Miller, Adrian R. Pearce & Liz Sonenberg - 2022 - Artificial Intelligence 302 (C):103605.details
|
|
Nonmonotonic inference based on expectations.Peter Gärdenfors & David Makinson - 1994 - Artificial Intelligence 65 (2):197-245.details
|
|
On the Ramsey Test Analysis of ‘Because’.Holger Andreas & Mario Günther - 2019 - Erkenntnis 84 (6):1229-1262.details
|
|
Belief Dynamics: (Epistemo)logical Investigations.Allard Tamminga - 2001 - Dissertation, University of Amsterdamdetails
|
|
A New Psychologism in Logic? Reflections from the Point of View of Belief Revision.Hans Rott - 2008 - Studia Logica 88 (1):113-136.details
|
|
A Plea for Accuracy.Sven Ove Hansson & Hans Rott - 1998 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 8 (3):221-224.details
|
|
Recovery Recovered.Stephen Murray Glaister - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (2):171 - 206.details
|
|
Changing the theory of theory change: Towards a computational approach.Neil Tennant - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (3):865-897.details
|
|
Severe withdrawal (and recovery).Hans Rott & Maurice Pagnucco - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (5):501-547.details
|
|
On knowledge evolution: acquisition, revision, contraction.Eliezer L. Lozinskii - 1997 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 7 (1-2):177-211.details
|
|
The cost of consistency: information economy in Paraconsistent Belief Revision.Rafael Testa - 2015 - South American Journal of Logic 1 (2):461-480.details
|
|
Theory contraction and base contraction unified.Sven Ove Hansson - 1993 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 58 (2):602-625.details
|
|
Similarity semantics and minimal changes of belief.Sven Ove Hansson - 1992 - Erkenntnis 37 (3):401-429.details
|
|
Specified Meet Contraction.Sven Ove Hansson - 2008 - Erkenntnis 69 (1):31-54.details
|
|
Semi-revision.Sven Hansson - 1997 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 7 (1-2):151-175.details
|
|
Reversing the Levi identity.Sven Ove Hansson - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 22 (6):637 - 669.details
|
|
Recovery and epistemic residue.Sven Ove Hansson - 1999 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 8 (4):421-428.details
|
|
New operators for theory change.Svenove Hansson - 1989 - Theoria 55 (2):114-132.details
|
|
Knowledge-level analysis of belief base operations.Sven Ove Hansson - 1996 - Artificial Intelligence 82 (1-2):215-235.details
|
|
In defense of base contraction.Sven Ove Hansson - 1992 - Synthese 91 (3):239 - 245.details
|
|
How not to change the theory of theory change: A reply to Tennant.Sven Ove Hansson & Hans Rott - 1995 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (3):361-380.details
|
|
Descriptor Revision: Belief Change Through Direct Choice.Sven Ove Hansson - 2017 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag.details
|
|
Changes of disjunctively closed bases.Sven Ove Hansson - 1993 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 2 (4):255-284.details
|
|
Back to Basics: Belief Revision Through Direct Selection.Sven Ove Hansson - 2019 - Studia Logica 107 (5):887-915.details
|
|
Beyond recovery? A reply to Tennant.Sven-ove Hansson & Hans Rott - 1998 - Erkenntnis 49 (3):387-392.details
|
|
Belief contraction without recovery.Sven Ove Hansson - 1991 - Studia Logica 50 (2):251 - 260.details
|
|
Four Ways in Which Theories of Belief Revision Could Benefit from Theories of Epistemic Justification.Gordian Haas - 2020 - Erkenntnis 85 (2):295-316.details
|
|
Notes on the History of Ideas Behind AGM.Peter Gärdenfors - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 40 (2):115 - 120.details
|
|
Recovery recovered.StephenMurray Glaister - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (2):171-206.details
|
|
Iterated Contraction Based on Indistinguishability.Konstantinos Georgatos - 2013 - In Sergei Artemov & Anil Nerode (eds.), LFCS 2013. Springer. pp. 194–205.details
|
|
Levi and Harper identities for non-prioritized belief base change.Marco Garapa, Eduardo Fermé & Maurício D. L. Reis - 2023 - Artificial Intelligence 319 (C):103907.details
|
|
AGM 25 Years: Twenty-Five Years of Research in Belief Change.Eduardo Fermé & Sven Ove Hansson - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 40 (2):295-331.details
|
|
On a Logico-Algebraic Approach to AGM Belief Contraction Theory.D. Fazio & M. Pra Baldi - 2021 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 50 (5):911-938.details
|
|
(1 other version)Changing the theory of theory change: Reply to my critics.Neil Tennant - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (4):569-586.details
|
|
Gricean Belief Change.James P. Delgrande, Abhaya C. Nayak & Maurice Pagnucco - 2005 - Studia Logica 79 (1):97-113.details
|
|
Belief Revision and Computational Argumentation: A Critical Comparison.Pietro Baroni, Eduardo Fermé, Massimiliano Giacomin & Guillermo Ricardo Simari - 2022 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 31 (4):555-589.details
|
|
A Representation Result for Value-based Contraction.Horacio Arló Costa & Hailin Liu - 2018 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 47 (6):965-989.details
|
|
Iterated Belief Change and the Recovery Axiom.Samir Chopra, Aditya Ghose, Thomas Meyer & Ka-Shu Wong - 2008 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 37 (5):501-520.details
|
|
Minimal change: Relevance and recovery revisited.Márcio M. Ribeiro, Renata Wassermann, Giorgos Flouris & Grigoris Antoniou - 2013 - Artificial Intelligence 201:59-80.details
|
|
Taking Up Thagard’s Challenge: A Formal Model of Conceptual Revision.Sena Bozdag & Matteo De Benedetto - 2022 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 51 (4):791-824.details
|
|