- Belief in the Face of Controversy.Hilary Kornblith - 2010 - In Richard Feldman & Ted A. Warfield (eds.), Disagreement. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
(1 other version)Disagreement as Evidence: The Epistemology of Controversy. [REVIEW]David Christensen - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (5):754-767.details
|
|
Knockdown Arguments.Nathan Ballantyne - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (3):525-543.details
|
|
Evidentialism, Higher-Order Evidence, and Disagreement.Richard Feldman - 2009 - Episteme 6 (3):294-312.details
|
|
(1 other version)Disagreement as evidence: The epistemology of controversy.David Christensen - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (5):756-767.details
|
|
Counterfactuals.David K. Lewis - 1973 - Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.details
|
|
(1 other version)Contemporary theories of knowledge.John L. Pollock - 1986 - London: Hutchinson.details
|
|
The Reflective Epistemic Renegade.Bryan Frances - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (2):419 - 463.details
|
|
Disagreement, Dogmatism, and Belief Polarization.Thomas Kelly - 2008 - Journal of Philosophy 105 (10):611-633.details
|
|
(2 other versions)The epistemic significance of disagreement.Thomas Kelly - 2005 - In Tamar Szabo Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology Volume 1. Oxford University Press. pp. 167-196.details
|
|
(1 other version)Epistemology of disagreement: The good news.David Christensen - 2007 - Philosophical Review 116 (2):187-217.details
|
|
Thought.Gilbert Harman - 1973 - Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.details
|
|
The Epistemology of Disagreement: New Essays.David Phiroze Christensen & Jennifer Lackey (eds.) - 2013 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
(2 other versions)Counterfactuals.David Lewis - 1973 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 36 (3):602-605.details
|
|
(1 other version)Thought.Gilbert Harman - 1973 - Noûs 11 (4):421-430.details
|
|
Listening to Clifford's Ghost.Peter van Inwagen - 2009 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 65:15-35.details
|
|
Problems for Dogmatism.Roger White - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 131 (3):525-557.details
|
|
Fate, Time, and Language: An Essay on Free Will.David Foster Wallace, James Ryerson & Jay Garfield (eds.) - 2010 - New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press.details
|
|
Disagreement and Belief Dependence: Why Numbers Matter.Jennifer Lackey - 2013 - In David Phiroze Christensen & Jennifer Lackey (eds.), The Epistemology of Disagreement: New Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 243-268.details
|
|
Epistemic Modesty Defended.David Christensen - 2013 - In David Phiroze Christensen & Jennifer Lackey (eds.), The Epistemology of Disagreement: New Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 77.details
|
|
Disagreement and skepticism.Diego E. Machuca (ed.) - 2012 - New York: Routledge.details
|
|
Freedom to break the laws.Peter van Inwagen - 2004 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 28 (1):334–350.details
|
|
(2 other versions)Counterfactuals.David Lewis - 1973 - Foundations of Language 13 (1):145-151.details
|
|
(1 other version)Disagreement.Richard Feldman & Ted A. Warfield (eds.) - 2010 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
Epistemological puzzles about disagreement.Richard Feldman - 2006 - In Stephen Cade Hetherington (ed.), Epistemology futures. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 216-236.details
|
|
Dogmatism, junk knowledge, and conditionals.Roy A. Sorensen - 1988 - Philosophical Quarterly 38 (153):433-454.details
|
|
(4 other versions)The Philosophy of Logical Atomism.Bertrand Russell - 1919 - The Monist 29 (2):190-222.details
|
|
Contemporary Theories of Knowledge.John Pollock - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (1):131-140.details
|
|
Contemporary Theories of Knowledge.Hilary Kornblith - 1988 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 49 (1):167-171.details
|
|
Possible disagreements and defeat.Brandon Carey - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 155 (3):371-381.details
|
|
(1 other version)Can It Be That It Would Have Been Even Though It Might Not Have Been?Keith DeRose - 1999 - Noûs 33 (s13):385-413.details
|
|
(1 other version)Can it be that it would have been even though it might not have been?Keith DeRose - 1999 - Philosophical Perspectives 13:385-413.details
|
|
(1 other version)Thought.Gilbert Harman & Laurence BonJour - 1975 - Philosophical Review 84 (2):256.details
|
|
(1 other version)The Philosophy of Logical Atomism.Bertrand Russell (ed.) - 1940 - Routledge.details
|
|
(1 other version)The Philosophy of Logical Atomism.Bertrand Russell - 1940 - Open Court. Edited by David Pears.details
|
|