- Why Replication is Overrated.Uljana Feest - 2019 - Philosophy of Science 86 (5):895-905.details
|
|
Re-Thinking Reproducibility as a Criterion for Research Quality.Sabina Leonelli - 2018 - Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 36 (B):129-146.details
|
|
(1 other version)Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy.Florian Cova, Brent Strickland, Angela Abatista, Aurélien Allard, James Andow, Mario Attie, James Beebe, Renatas Berniūnas, Jordane Boudesseul, Matteo Colombo, Fiery Cushman, Rodrigo Diaz, Noah N’Djaye Nikolai van Dongen, Vilius Dranseika, Brian D. Earp, Antonio Gaitán Torres, Ivar Hannikainen, José V. Hernández-Conde, Wenjia Hu, François Jaquet, Kareem Khalifa, Hanna Kim, Markus Kneer, Joshua Knobe, Miklos Kurthy, Anthony Lantian, Shen-yi Liao, Edouard Machery, Tania Moerenhout, Christian Mott, Mark Phelan, Jonathan Phillips, Navin Rambharose, Kevin Reuter, Felipe Romero, Paulo Sousa, Jan Sprenger, Emile Thalabard, Kevin Tobia, Hugo Viciana, Daniel Wilkenfeld & Xiang Zhou - 2018 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology (1):1-36.details
|
|
Novelty versus Replicability: Virtues and Vices in the Reward System of Science.Felipe Romero - 2017 - Philosophy of Science 84 (5):1031-1043.details
|
|
(1 other version)Probability and Evidence by Paul Horwich. [REVIEW]Stephen Spielman - 1984 - Journal of Philosophy 81 (3):168-173.details
|
|
(4 other versions)The Logic of Scientific Discovery.Karl Popper - 1959 - Studia Logica 9:262-265.details
|
|
(1 other version)Science and Hypothesis.Thomas Nickles - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (4):653-655.details
|
|
(1 other version)Science and Hypothesis.Thomas Nickles - 1984 - Erkenntnis 21 (3):433-438.details
|
|
In and About the World: Philosophical Studies of Science and Technology.Hans Radder - 1996 - State University of New York Press.details
|
|
Epistemic Trust in Science.Torsten Wilholt - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (2):233-253.details
|
|
Robustness, discordance, and relevance.Jacob Stegenga - 2009 - Philosophy of Science 76 (5):650-661.details
|
|
(1 other version)Experience and Prediction: An Analysis of the Foundations and the Structure of Knowledge.Hans Reichenbach - 1938 - Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.details
|
|
The social dimensions of scientific knowledge.Helen Longino - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.details
|
|
What Is a Replication?Edouard Machery - 2020 - Philosophy of Science 87 (4):545-567.details
|
|
Self-correction in science: Meta-analysis, bias and social structure.Justin P. Bruner & Bennett Holman - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 78:93-97.details
|
|
Variety of Evidence.Jürgen Landes - 2020 - Erkenntnis 85 (1):183-223.details
|
|
(1 other version)Review of Hans Radder: In and About the World: Philosophical Studies of Science and Technology. [REVIEW]Towfic Shomar - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (1):185-188.details
|
|
(4 other versions)Probability and Evidence.Paul Horwich - 1985 - Erkenntnis 23 (2):213-219.details
|
|
(1 other version)Experience and Prediction.Eleanor Bisbee - 1938 - Philosophy of Science 5 (3):360-366.details
|
|
Science and Hypothesis: Historical Essays on Scientific Methodology.Larry Laudan & R. Laudan - 1981 - Springer.details
|
|
P-curve: A key to the file-drawer.Uri Simonsohn, Leif D. Nelson & Joseph P. Simmons - 2014 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143 (2):534-547.details
|
|
Peircean Induction and the Error-Correcting Thesis.Deborah G. Mayo - 2005 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 41 (2):299 - 319.details
|
|
Robustness, Reliability, and Overdetermination (1981).William C. Wimsatt - 2012 - In Lena Soler (ed.), Characterizing the robustness of science: after the practice turn in philosophy of science. New York: Springer Verlag. pp. 61-78.details
|
|
(4 other versions)Probability and Evidence.Paul Horwich - 1984 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (2):161-166.details
|
|
Experience and Prediction. An Analysis of the Foundations and the Structure of Knowledge. [REVIEW]E. N. & Hans Reichenbach - 1938 - Journal of Philosophy 35 (10):270.details
|
|
(4 other versions)The Logic of Scientific Discovery.K. Popper - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):55-57.details
|
|
(1 other version)Scientific self-correction: the Bayesian way.Felipe Romero & Jan Sprenger - 2020 - Synthese 198 (S23):5803-5823.details
|
|
The Alpha War.Edouard Machery - 2019 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 12 (1):75-99.details
|
|
Can the Behavioral Sciences Self-correct? A Social Epistemic Study.Felipe Romero - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 60 (C):55-69.details
|
|
How Does One “Open” Science? Questions of Value in Biological Research.Sabina Leonelli & Nadine Levin - 2017 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 42 (2):280-305.details
|
|
(1 other version)Scientific self-correction: the Bayesian way.Felipe Romero & Jan Sprenger - 2020 - Synthese (Suppl 23):1-21.details
|
|
In and About the World: Philosophical Studies of Science and Technology.Hans Radder - 1996 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 59 (2):377-377.details
|
|
Power and Negative Results.Edouard Machery - 2012 - Philosophy of Science 79 (5):808-820.details
|
|
Who Should Do Replication Labor?Felipe Romero - 2018 - Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 1 (4):516-537.details
|
|
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False.John P. A. Ioannidis - 2005 - PLoS Med 2 (8):e124.details
|
|
(4 other versions)Probability and Evidence.Paul Horwich - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (4):659-660.details
|
|