 The Final Cut.Elia Zardini  2022  Journal of Philosophical Logic 51 (6):15831611.details


Las Lógicas Mixtas como escape al Problema del Colapso y al Desafío de Quine.Joaquín Santiago Toranzo Calderón  2020  Análisis Filosófico 40 (2):247272.details


The (Greatest) Fragment of Classical Logic that Respects the VariableSharing Principle (in the FMLAFMLA Framework).Damian E. Szmuc  2021  Bulletin of the Section of Logic 50 (4):421453.details


Classical Logic and the Strict Tolerant Hierarchy.Chris Scambler  2020  Journal of Philosophical Logic 49 (2):351370.details


One Step is Enough.David Ripley  2021  Journal of Philosophical Logic 51 (6):127.details


One Step is Enough.David Ripley  2022  Journal of Philosophical Logic 51 (6):12331259.details


Supervaluations and the StrictTolerant Hierarchy.Brian Porter  2021  Journal of Philosophical Logic 51 (6):13671386.details


Empty Logics.Federico Pailos  2021  Journal of Philosophical Logic 51 (6):13871415.details


Classical Logic is not Uniquely Characterizable.Isabella McAllister  2022  Journal of Philosophical Logic 51 (6):13451365.details


On the Metainferential Solution to the Semantic Paradoxes.Rea Golan  2023  Journal of Philosophical Logic 52 (3):797820.details


A truthmaker semantics for ST: refusing to climb the strict/tolerant hierarchy.Ulf Hlobil  2022  Synthese 200 (5):123.details


Limits of Abductivism About Logic.Ulf Hlobil  2020  Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 103 (2):320340.details


There is no tenable notion of global metainferential validity.Rea Golan  2021  Analysis 81 (3):411420.details


Metainferences from a ProofTheoretic Perspective, and a Hierarchy of Validity Predicates.Rea Golan  2022  Journal of Philosophical Logic 51 (6):1295–1325.details


Expressing logical disagreement from within.Andreas Fjellstad  2022  Synthese 200 (2):133.details


Metainferential Reasoning on Strong Kleene Models.Andreas Fjellstad  2021  Journal of Philosophical Logic 51 (6):13271344.details


A Family of Strict/Tolerant Logics.Melvin Fitting  2020  Journal of Philosophical Logic 50 (2):363394.details


Inferential Constants.Camillo Fiore, Federico Pailos & Mariela Rubin  2022  Journal of Philosophical Logic 52 (3):767796.details


Deep ST.Thomas M. Ferguson & Elisángela RamírezCámara  2021  Journal of Philosophical Logic 51 (6):12611293.details


Variations on intratheoretical logical pluralism: internal versus external consequence.Bogdan Dicher  2020  Philosophical Studies 177 (3):667686.details


Requiem for logical nihilism, or: Logical nihilism annihilated.Bogdan Dicher  2020  Synthese 198 (8):70737096.details


SequentCalculi for Metainferential Logics.Bruno Da Ré & Federico Pailos  2021  Studia Logica 110 (2):319353.details


Paraconsistencia pura.Bruno Da Ré  2019  Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso 13:90101.details


Metainferential Paraconsistency.Bruno Da Ré, Mariela Rubin & Paula Teijeiro  forthcoming  Logic and Logical Philosophy:126.details


Metainferential duality.Bruno Da Ré, Federico Pailos, Damian Szmuc & Paula Teijeiro  2020  Journal of Applied NonClassical Logics 30 (4):312334.details


Derivability and Metainferential Validity.Bruno Da Ré, Damian Szmuc & Paula Teijeiro  2021  Journal of Philosophical Logic 51 (6):15211547.details


Inferences and Metainferences in ST.Pablo Cobreros, Paul Egré, David Ripley & Robert van Rooij  2020  Journal of Philosophical Logic 49 (6):10571077.details


Higherlevel Inferences in the StrongKleene Setting: A Prooftheoretic Approach.Pablo Cobreros, Elio La Rosa & Luca Tranchini  2021  Journal of Philosophical Logic 51 (6):14171452.details


(I can’t get no) antisatisfaction.Pablo Cobreros, Elio La Rosa & Luca Tranchini  2020  Synthese 198 (9):82518265.details


Local Applications of Logics via ModelTheoretic Interpretations.Carlos BenitoMonsalvo  forthcoming  Logic and Logical Philosophy:122.details


Validities, antivalidities and contingencies: A multistandard approach.Eduardo Barrio & Federico Pailos  2021  Journal of Philosophical Logic 51 (1):7598.details


Substructural logics, pluralism and collapse.Eduardo Alejandro Barrio, Federico Pailos & Damian Szmuc  2018  Synthese 198 (Suppl 20):49915007.details


(Meta)inferential levels of entailment beyond the Tarskian paradigm.Eduardo Alejandro Barrio, Federico Pailos & Damian Szmuc  2019  Synthese 198 (S22):52655289.details


Editorial Introduction: Substructural Logics and Metainferences.Eduardo Barrio & Paul Égré  2022  Journal of Philosophical Logic 51 (6):12151231.details


Antiexceptionalism, truth and the BAplan.Eduardo Alejandro Barrio, Federico Pailos & Joaquín Toranzo Calderón  2021  Synthese 199 (56):1256112586.details


Nontransitive counterparts of every Tarskian logic.Damian Szmuc  forthcoming  Analysis.details


Translating Metainferences Into Formulae: Satisfaction Operators and Sequent Calculi.Ariel Jonathan Roffé & Federico Pailos  2021  Australasian Journal of Logic 3.details


Expressing Validity: Towards a SelfSufficient Inferentialism.Ulf Hlobil  2020  In Martin Blicha & Igor Sedlár (eds.), The Logica Yearbook 2019. London: College Publications. pp. 6782.details

