- Degrees of belief.Franz Huber & Christoph Schmidt-Petri (eds.) - 2009 - London: Springer.details
|
|
Thagard's Principle 7 and Simpson's paradox.Robyn M. Dawes - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):472-473.details
|
|
The purpose of experiments: Ecological validity versus comparing hypotheses.Robyn M. Dawes - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (1):20-20.details
|
|
Is irrationality systematic?Robyn M. Dawes - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (3):491.details
|
|
The plasticity of human rationality.Norman Daniels & George E. Smith - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (3):490.details
|
|
First order extensions of classical systems of modal logic; the role of the Barcan schemas.Horacio Arló Costa - 2002 - Studia Logica 71 (1):87-118.details
|
|
Are base rates a natural category of information?Terry Connolly - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (1):19-20.details
|
|
Two problems for the explanatory coherence theory of acceptability.L. Jonathan Cohen - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):471-471.details
|
|
The need for a theory of evidential weight.L. Jonathan Cohen - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (1):18-19.details
|
|
The controversy about irrationality.L. Jonathan Cohen - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (3):510.details
|
|
Status of the rationality assumption in psychology.Marvin S. Cohen - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):332-333.details
|
|
Rational reconstruction of inferential processes-a task straddling the Al-CS boundaries.L. Jonathan Cohen - 1978 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1 (1):101-102.details
|
|
Johnson‐Laird's theory of induction.L. Jonathan Cohen - 1994 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 8 (1):35 – 36.details
|
|
Can human irrationality be experimentally demonstrated?L. Jonathan Cohen - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):317-370.details
|
|
Bayesianism versus baconianism in the evaluation of medical diagnoses.L. Jonathan Cohen - 1980 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 31 (1):45-62.details
|
|
Belief, acceptance, and probability.L. Jonathan Cohen - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (2):248-249.details
|
|
Are there any a priori constraints on the study of rationality?L. Jonathan Cohen - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):359-370.details
|
|
Are people programmed to commit fallacies? Further thoughts about the interpretation of experimental data on probability judgment.L. Jonathan Cohen - 1982 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 12 (3):251–274.details
|
|
Assimilating evidence: The key to revision?Michelene T. H. Chi - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):470-471.details
|
|
The epistemological status of lay intuition.Christopher Cherniak - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (3):489.details
|
|
Explanatory coherence as a psychological theory.P. C.-H. Cheng & M. Keane - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):469-470.details
|
|
The implications of Koehler's approach for fact finding.Craig R. Callen - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (1):18-18.details
|
|
Belief, credence, and norms.Lara Buchak - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 169 (2):1-27.details
|
|
From Classical to Intuitionistic Probability.Brian Weatherson - 2003 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 44 (2):111-123.details
|
|
Discrepancies between human behavior and formal theories of rationality: The incompleteness of Bayesian probability logic.Lea Brilmayer - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (3):488.details
|
|
The chemistry of substances and the philosophy of mass terms.J. Brakel - 1986 - Synthese 69 (3):291 - 324.details
|
|
Too Odd (Not) to Be True? A Reply to Olsson.Luc Bovens, Branden Fitelson, Stephan Hartmann & Josh Snyder - 2002 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (4):539-563.details
|
|
Sensitivity, Causality, and Statistical Evidence in Courts of Law.Michael Blome-Tillmann - 2015 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 4 (2):102-112.details
|
|
Statistical Evidence, Normalcy, and the Gatecrasher Paradox.Michael Blome-Tillmann - 2020 - Mind 129 (514):563-578.details
|
|
Rational animal?Simon Blackburn - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):331-332.details
|
|
Solving a Murder Case by Asking Critical Questions: An Approach to Fact-Finding in Terms of Argumentation and Story Schemes. [REVIEW]Floris Bex & Bart Verheij - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (3):325-353.details
|
|
When weak explanations prevail.Carl Bereiter & Marlene Scardamalia - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):468-469.details
|
|
What should we believe about the future?Miloud Belkoniene - 2020 - Synthese 197 (6):2375-2386.details
|
|
To err is human.Maya Bar-Hillel & Avishai Margalit - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (2):246-248.details
|
|
Epistemology and the law: why there is no epistemic mileage in legal cases.Marvin Backes - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (9):2759-2778.details
|
|
Cognitive algebra versus representativeness heuristic.Norman H. Anderson - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (1):17-17.details
|
|
The rationality of the scientist: Toward reconciliation.Jonathan E. Adler - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (3):487.details
|
|
Human rationality: Essential conflicts, multiple ideals.Jonathan E. Adler - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (2):245-246.details
|
|
Contextualism and fallibility: pragmatic encroachment, possibility, and strength of epistemic position.Jonathan E. Adler - 2012 - Synthese 188 (2):247-272.details
|
|
Akratic believing?Jonathan E. Adler - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 110 (1):1 - 27.details
|
|
Explanation and acceptability.Peter Achinstein - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):467-468.details
|
|
Atomismo Y holismo en la justificación probatoria.Daniela Accatino - 2014 - Isonomía. Revista de Teoría y Filosofía Del Derecho 40:17-59.details
|
|
Accepted beliefs, revision and bipolarity in the possibilistic framework.Didier Dubois & Henri Prade - 2009 - In Franz Huber & Christoph Schmidt-Petri (eds.), Degrees of belief. London: Springer. pp. 161--184.details
|
|
Degrees all the way down: Beliefs, non-beliefs and disbeliefs.Hans Rott - 2009 - In Franz Huber & Christoph Schmidt-Petri (eds.), Degrees of belief. London: Springer. pp. 301--339.details
|
|
A Survey of Ranking Theory.Wolfgang Spohn - 2009 - In Franz Huber & Christoph Schmidt-Petri (eds.), Degrees of belief. London: Springer.details
|
|
Non-additive degrees of belief.Rolf Haenni - 2009 - In Franz Huber & Christoph Schmidt-Petri (eds.), Degrees of belief. London: Springer. pp. 121--159.details
|
|
Knowledge, Evidence, and Naked Statistics.Sherrilyn Roush - 2023 - In Luis R. G. Oliveira (ed.), Externalism about Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
'More Likely Than Not' - Knowledge First and the Role of Statistical Evidence in Courts of Law.Michael Blome-Tillmann - 2017 - In Carter Adam, Gordon Emma & Jarvis Benjamin (eds.), Knowledge First,. Oxford University Press. pp. 278-292.details
|
|
Issues for the next generation of base rate research.Jonathan J. Koehler - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (1):41-53.details
|
|
The base rate fallacy reconsidered: Descriptive, normative, and methodological challenges.Jonathan J. Koehler - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (1):1-17.details
|
|