- When nomenclature matters: Is the “new paradigm” really a new paradigm for the psychology of reasoning?Markus Knauff & Lupita Estefania Gazzo Castañeda - 2023 - Thinking and Reasoning 29 (3):341-370.details
|
|
Causal Argument.Ulrike Hahn, Frank Zenker & Roland Bluhm - 2017 - In Michael Waldmann (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Causal Reasoning. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. pp. 475-494.details
|
|
Thou Shalt Not Squander Life – Comparing Five Approaches to Argument Strength.Simon Wells, Marcin Selinger, David Godden, Kamila Dębowska-Kozłowska & Frank Zenker - 2023 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 68 (1):133-167.details
|
|
The Compact Compendium of Experimental Philosophy.Alexander Max Bauer & Stephan Kornmesser (eds.) - 2023 - Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.details
|
|
Argument evaluation and production in the correction of political innumeracy.Martin Dockendorff & Hugo Mercier - 2024 - Thinking and Reasoning 30 (1):195-217.details
|
|
Reasoning, robots, and navigation: Dual roles for deductive and abductive reasoning.Janet Wiles - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):92-92.details
|
|
Bayes et les biais. Le « biais de confirmation » en question.Marion Vorms - 2021 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 112 (4):567-590.details
|
|
Towards a pattern-based logic of probability judgements and logical inclusion “fallacies”.Momme von Sydow - 2016 - Thinking and Reasoning 22 (3):297-335.details
|
|
The skeptical import of motivated reasoning: A closer look at the evidence.Maarten van Doorn - 2023 - Thinking and Reasoning 1 (1):1-31.details
|
|
The Making of Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-dialectical View.Frans H. van Eemeren & Ton van Haaften - 2023 - Argumentation 37 (3):341-376.details
|
|
The Selective Laziness of Reasoning.Emmanuel Trouche, Petter Johansson, Lars Hall & Hugo Mercier - 2015 - Cognitive Science 40 (8):2122-2136.details
|
|
Objective Evaluation of Demonstrative Arguments.Emmanuel Trouche, Jing Shao & Hugo Mercier - 2019 - Argumentation 33 (1):23-43.details
|
|
Belief bias in informal reasoning.Valerie Thompson & Jonathan St B. T. Evans - 2012 - Thinking and Reasoning 18 (3):278 - 310.details
|
|
Logic, Probability, and Pragmatics in Syllogistic Reasoning.Michael Henry Tessler, Joshua B. Tenenbaum & Noah D. Goodman - 2022 - Topics in Cognitive Science 14 (3):574-601.details
|
|
On the determinants of the conjunction fallacy: Probability versus inductive confirmation.Katya Tentori, Vincenzo Crupi & Selena Russo - 2013 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 142 (1):235.details
|
|
Judging the Probability of Hypotheses Versus the Impact of Evidence: Which Form of Inductive Inference Is More Accurate and Time‐Consistent?Katya Tentori, Nick Chater & Vincenzo Crupi - 2016 - Cognitive Science 40 (3):758-778.details
|
|
The chronometrics of confirmation bias: Evidence for the inhibition of intuitive judgements.Edward Jn Stupple & Linden J. Ball - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):89-90.details
|
|
A test of two processes: The effect of training on deductive and inductive reasoning.Rachel G. Stephens, John C. Dunn, Brett K. Hayes & Michael L. Kalish - 2020 - Cognition 199 (C):104223.details
|
|
On interpretation of the effects of noise on cognitive performance: the fallacy of confusing the definition of an effect with the explanation of that effect.Patrik Sã¶Rqvist - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.details
|
|
Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.Dan Sperber - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):57.details
|
|
The problem of logical omniscience, the preface paradox, and doxastic commitments.Niels Skovgaard-Olsen - 2017 - Synthese 194 (3):917-939.details
|
|
The Dialogical Entailment Task.Niels Skovgaard-Olsen - 2019 - Cognition (C):104010.details
|
|
Norm Conflicts and Conditionals.Niels Skovgaard-Olsen, David Kellen, Ulrike Hahn & Karl Christoph Klauer - 2019 - Psychological Review 126 (5):611-633.details
|
|
Argumentation and Fallacy in the Justification of the 2003 War on Iraq.Ahmed Sahlane - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (4):459-488.details
|
|
Argumentative Thinking: An Introduction to the Special Issue on Psychology and Argumentation.Lance J. Rips - 2009 - Informal Logic 29 (4):327-336.details
|
|
Rational Hypocrisy: A Bayesian Analysis Based on Informal Argumentation and Slippery Slopes.Tage S. Rai & Keith J. Holyoak - 2014 - Cognitive Science 38 (7):1456-1467.details
|
|
Faster Teaching via POMDP Planning.Anna N. Rafferty, Emma Brunskill, Thomas L. Griffiths & Patrick Shafto - 2016 - Cognitive Science 40 (6):1290-1332.details
|
|
Editors' Review and Introduction: Models of Rational Proof in Criminal Law.Henry Prakken, Floris Bex & Anne Ruth Mackor - 2020 - Topics in Cognitive Science 12 (4):1053-1067.details
|
|
A Bayesian framework for knowledge attribution: Evidence from semantic integration.Derek Powell, Zachary Horne, Ángel Pinillos & Keith Holyoak - 2015 - Cognition 139 (C):92-104.details
|
|
Popper's severity of test as an intuitive probabilistic model of hypothesis testing.Fenna H. Poletiek - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):99-100.details
|
|
Four Problems of Abduction: A Brief History.Anya Plutynski - 2011 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 1 (2):227-248.details
|
|
Probabilistic interpretations of argumentative attacks: Logical and experimental results.Niki Pfeifer & Christian G. Fermüller - 2023 - Argument and Computation 14 (1):75-107.details
|
|
Towards an empirically informed normative Bayesian scheme-based account of argument from expert opinion.Kong Ngai Pei & Chin Shing Arthur Chin - 2023 - Thinking and Reasoning 29 (4):726-759.details
|
|
The Impact Factor Fallacy.Frieder M. Paulus, Nicole Cruz & Sören Krach - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9:324900.details
|
|
A Plea for Ecological Argument Technologies.Fabio Paglieri - 2017 - Philosophy and Technology 30 (2):209-238.details
|
|
The uncertain reasoner: Bayes, logic, and rationality.Mike Oaksford & Nick Chater - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):105-120.details
|
|
The “is-ought fallacy” fallacy.Mike Oaksford & Nick Chater - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):262-263.details
|
|
Probabilities, causation, and logic programming in conditional reasoning: reply to Stenning and Van Lambalgen.Mike Oaksford & Nick Chater - 2016 - Thinking and Reasoning 22 (3):336-354.details
|
|
Putting reasoning and judgement in their proper argumentative place.Mike Oaksford - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):84-85.details
|
|
Mental models, computational explanation and Bayesian cognitive science: Commentary on Knauff and Gazzo Castañeda (2023).Mike Oaksford - 2023 - Thinking and Reasoning 29 (3):371-382.details
|
|
Imaging deductive reasoning and the new paradigm.Mike Oaksford - 2015 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9.details
|
|
Dynamic inference and everyday conditional reasoning in the new paradigm.Mike Oaksford & Nick Chater - 2013 - Thinking and Reasoning 19 (3-4):346-379.details
|
|
Could Bayesian cognitive science undermine dual-process theories of reasoning?Mike Oaksford - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e134.details
|
|
Bayesian argumentation and the pragmatic approach: Comment on Darmstadter.Mike Oaksford - 2013 - Thinking and Reasoning 19 (3-4):495-499.details
|
|
Abductive conditionals as a test case for inferentialism.Patricia Mirabile & Igor Douven - 2020 - Cognition 200 (C):104232.details
|
|
A rational reinterpretation of dual-process theories.Smitha Milli, Falk Lieder & Thomas L. Griffiths - 2021 - Cognition 217 (C):104881.details
|
|
When Experts Argue: Explaining the Best and the Worst of Reasoning. [REVIEW]Hugo Mercier - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (3):313-327.details
|
|
Scientists' Argumentative Reasoning.Hugo Mercier & Christophe Heintz - 2014 - Topoi 33 (2):513-524.details
|
|
Some Clarifications about the Argumentative Theory of Reasoning. A Reply to Santibáñez Yañez (2012).Hugo Mercier - 2012 - Informal Logic 32 (2):259-268.details
|
|
Looking for Arguments.Hugo Mercier - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (3):305-324.details
|
|