- Algorithmic Decision-making, Statistical Evidence and the Rule of Law.Vincent Chiao - forthcoming - Episteme.details
|
|
The Philosophy of Legal Proof.Lewis Ross - 2024 - Cambridge University Press.details
|
|
Statistical evidence and algorithmic decision-making.Sune Holm - 2023 - Synthese 202 (1):1-16.details
|
|
Profiling, Neutrality, and Social Equality.Lewis Ross - 2022 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 100 (4):808-824.details
|
|
Civil liability and the 50%+ standard of proof.Martin Smith - 2021 - International Journal of Evidence and Proof 25 (3):183-199.details
|
|
Between Probability and Certainty: What Justifies Belief.Martin Smith - 2016 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.details
|
|
Justification, knowledge, and normality.Clayton Littlejohn & Julien Dutant - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (6):1593-1609.details
|
|
Proof Paradoxes and Normic Support: Socializing or Relativizing?Marcello Di Bello - 2020 - Mind 129 (516):1269-1285.details
|
|
Legal proof: why knowledge matters and knowing does not.Andy Mueller - 2024 - Asian Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):1-22.details
|
|
Truth, knowledge, and the standard of proof in criminal law.Clayton Littlejohn - 2020 - Synthese 197 (12):5253-5286.details
|
|
Belief, credence, and norms.Lara Buchak - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 169 (2):1-27.details
|
|
Epistemic Judgments are Insensitive to Probabilities.Adam Michael Bricker - 2020 - Metaphilosophy 51 (4):499-521.details
|
|
Epistemology and the law: why there is no epistemic mileage in legal cases.Marvin Backes - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (9):2759-2778.details
|
|
Legal Burdens of Proof and Statistical Evidence.Georgi Gardiner - 2018 - In David Coady & James Chase (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Applied Epistemology. New York: Routledge.details
|
|
Proof Paradoxes, Agency, and Stereotyping.Aness Kim Webster - 2021 - Philosophical Issues 31 (1):355-373.details
|
|
Meta-uncertainty and the proof paradoxes.Katie Steele & Mark Colyvan - 2023 - Philosophical Studies 180 (7):1927-1950.details
|
|
When Does Evidence Suffice for Conviction?Martin Smith - 2018 - Mind 127 (508):1193-1218.details
|
|
Reconsidering the Rule of Consideration: Probabilistic Knowledge and Legal Proof.Tim Smartt - 2022 - Episteme 19 (2):303-318.details
|
|
Statistical Evidence and the Problem of Specification.Frederick Schauer - 2023 - Episteme 20 (2):367-376.details
|
|
The Foundations of Criminal Law Epistemology.Lewis Ross - 2022 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 9.details
|
|
Recent work on the proof paradox.Lewis D. Ross - 2020 - Philosophy Compass 15 (6):e12667.details
|
|
Rehabilitating Statistical Evidence.Lewis Ross - 2019 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 102 (1):3-23.details
|
|
Legal proof and statistical conjunctions.Lewis D. Ross - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 178 (6):2021-2041.details
|
|
Justice in epistemic gaps: The ‘proof paradox’ revisited.Lewis Ross - 2021 - Philosophical Issues 31 (1):315-333.details
|
|
Criminal Proof: Fixed or Flexible?Lewis Ross - 2023 - Philosophical Quarterly (4):1-23.details
|
|
Can Self-determined Actions be Predictable?Amit Pundik - 2019 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 15 (2):121-140.details
|
|
In defence of the modal account of legal risk.Duncan Pritchard - 2022 - Synthese 200 (4):1-16.details
|
|
Belief in a Fallen World.Robert Pasnau - 2018 - Res Philosophica 95 (3):531-559.details
|
|
Bias and interpersonal skepticism.Robert Pasnau - 2022 - Noûs 56 (1):154-175.details
|
|
Safety vs. sensitivity: Possible worlds and the law of evidence.Michael S. Pardo - 2018 - Legal Theory 24 (1):50-75.details
|
|
Privacy rights and ‘naked’ statistical evidence.Lauritz Aastrup Munch - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178 (11):3777-3795.details
|
|
Knowledge, Individualised Evidence and Luck.Dario Mortini - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 179 (12):3791-3815.details
|
|
An Epistemic Objection to Racial Profiling.Alexandra Lloyd - forthcoming - Tandf: Social Epistemology:1-9.details
|
|
The ranges of reasons and creasons.Clayton Littlejohn - 2023 - Asian Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):1-10.details
|
|
Neuroprediction, Truth-Sensitivity, and the Law.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2014 - The Journal of Ethics 18 (2):123-136.details
|
|
Just Probabilities.Chad Lee-Stronach - forthcoming - Noûs.details
|
|
Norms of criminal conviction.Jennifer Lackey - 2021 - Philosophical Issues 31 (1):188-209.details
|
|
Standards and values.Matthew Kotzen - 2021 - Philosophical Issues 31 (1):167-187.details
|
|
Proof beyond a context-relevant doubt. A structural analysis of the standard of proof in criminal adjudication.Kyriakos N. Kotsoglou - 2020 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 28 (1):111-133.details
|
|
Proof beyond a context-relevant doubt. A structural analysis of the standard of proof in criminal adjudication.Kyriakos N. Kotsoglou - 2020 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 28 (1):111-133.details
|
|
Proof beyond a context-relevant doubt. A structural analysis of the standard of proof in criminal adjudication.Kyriakos N. Kotsoglou - 2020 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 28 (1):111-133.details
|
|
Proof beyond a context-relevant doubt. A structural analysis of the standard of proof in criminal adjudication.Kyriakos N. Kotsoglou - 2020 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 28 (1):111-133.details
|
|
Overcoming Luck: Two Trends in Legal Philosophy.Jeffrey S. Helmreich - 2018 - Analysis 78 (2):335-347.details
|
|
The safe, the sensitive, and the severely tested: a unified account.Georgi Gardiner & Brian Zaharatos - 2022 - Synthese 200 (5):1-33.details
|
|
Profiling and Proof: Are Statistics Safe?Georgi Gardiner - 2020 - Philosophy 95 (2):161-183.details
|
|
Corroboration.Georgi Gardiner - 2023 - American Philosophical Quarterly 60 (2):131-148.details
|
|
Statistical evidence and the criminal verdict asymmetry.Avital Fried - 2022 - Synthese 200 (6).details
|
|
Belief, Credence and Statistical Evidence.Davide Fassio & Jie Gao - 2020 - Theoria 86 (4):500-527.details
|
|
Statistical Evidence, Sensitivity, and the Legal Value of Knowledge.David Enoch, Levi Spectre & Talia Fisher - 2012 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 40 (3):197-224.details
|
|
Trial by Statistics: Is a High Probability of Guilt Enough to Convict?Marcello Di Bello - 2019 - Mind 128 (512):1045-1084.details
|
|