- Examining the role of deliberation in de-bias training.Esther Boissin, Serge Caparos & Wim De Neys - 2024 - Thinking and Reasoning 30 (2):327-355.details
|
|
The Agential View of Misfortune.Ronald J. Planer & Kim Sterelny - 2024 - Human Nature 35 (1):63-88.details
|
|
The 'whys' and 'whens' of individual differences in thinking biases.Wim De Neys & Jean-François Bonnefon - 2013 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17 (4):172-178.details
|
|
Advancing theorizing about fast-and-slow thinking.Wim De Neys - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e111.details
|
|
Moral Foundations Theory Among Autistic and Neurotypical Children.Erin Elizabeth Dempsey, Chris Moore, Shannon A. Johnson, Sherry H. Stewart & Isabel M. Smith - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 12.details
|
|
Private versus public: A dual model for resource-constrained conflict representations.Simon DeDeo - 2022 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 45.details
|
|
Intuitions and Arguments: Cognitive Foundations of Argumentation in Natural Theology.Helen De Cruz & Johan De Smedt - 2017 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 9 (2):57-82.details
|
|
Cognitive Science of Religion and the Study of Theological Concepts.Helen De Cruz - 2014 - Topoi 33 (2):487-497.details
|
|
Varieties of Deliberation: Framing Plurality in Political CSR.Cedric E. Dawkins - 2022 - Business Ethics Quarterly 32 (3):374-403.details
|
|
Why do humans reason? A pragmatist supplement to an argumentative theory.Howard Darmstadter - 2013 - Thinking and Reasoning 19 (3-4):472-487.details
|
|
Replies to Mercier and Oaksford.Howard Darmstadter - 2013 - Thinking and Reasoning 19 (3-4):500-504.details
|
|
Moral Reputation: An Evolutionary and Cognitive Perspective.Nicolas Baumard Dan Sperber - 2012 - Mind and Language 27 (5):495-518.details
|
|
Come Now, Let Us Reason Together.Austin Dacey - 2020 - Informal Logic 40 (1):47-76.details
|
|
Rationalization as representational exchange: Scope and mechanism.Fiery Cushman - 2020 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43.details
|
|
The value of epistemic disagreement in scientific practice. The case of Homo floresiensis.Helen De Cruz & Johan De Smedt - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (2):169-177.details
|
|
Pragmatic Competence Injustice.Manuel Padilla Cruz - 2018 - Social Epistemology 32 (3):143-163.details
|
|
The Ethics of Argumentation.Vasco Correia - 2012 - Informal Logic 32 (2):222-241.details
|
|
Contextual Debiasing and Critical Thinking: Reasons for Optimism.Vasco Correia - forthcoming - Topoi 35 (1):1-9.details
|
|
Contextual Debiasing and Critical Thinking: Reasons for Optimism.Vasco Correia - 2018 - Topoi 37 (1):103-111.details
|
|
Argumentation Theory for Mathematical Argument.Joseph Corneli, Ursula Martin, Dave Murray-Rust, Gabriela Rino Nesin & Alison Pease - 2019 - Argumentation 33 (2):173-214.details
|
|
Regret aversion in reason-based choice.Terry Connolly & Jochen Reb - 2012 - Theory and Decision 73 (1):35-51.details
|
|
Argumentative Virtues as Conduits for Reason’s Causal Efficacy: Why the Practice of Giving Reasons Requires that We Practice Hearing Reasons.Daniel H. Cohen - 2019 - Topoi 38 (4):711-718.details
|
|
Argumentative Virtues as Conduits for Reason’s Causal Efficacy: Why the Practice of Giving Reasons Requires that We Practice Hearing Reasons.Daniel H. Cohen - 2019 - Topoi 38 (4):711-718.details
|
|
Optimism in unconscious, intuitive morality.Cory J. Clark & Bo M. Winegard - 2019 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 42:e150.details
|
|
Research on Consumer Purchasing Channel Choice Based on Product Tolerance: The Mediating Role of Rationalization.Jinsong Chen, Yumin Wu & Xue Jiang - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.details
|
|
The paradox of social interaction: Shared intentionality, we-reasoning, and virtual bargaining.Nick Chater, Hossam Zeitoun & Tigran Melkonyan - 2022 - Psychological Review 129 (3):415-437.details
|
|
The enigma is not entirely dispelled: A review of Mercier and Sperber's The Enigma of Reason. [REVIEW]Nick Chater & Mike Oaksford - 2018 - Mind and Language 33 (5):525-532.details
|
|
Human Life Is Group Life: Deliberative Democracy for Realists.Simone Chambers - 2018 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 30 (1-2):36-48.details
|
|
Argumentation and the problem of agreement.John Casey & Scott F. Aikin - 2022 - Synthese 200 (2):1-23.details
|
|
Argumentation and Persistent Disagreement.Diego Castro - 2021 - Informal Logic 41 (2):245-280.details
|
|
Independent effects of relevance and arousal on deductive reasoning.Serge Caparos & Isabelle Blanchette - 2017 - Cognition and Emotion 31 (5):1012-1022.details
|
|
Judgments of taste as strategic moves in a coordination game.Filip Buekens - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.details
|
|
Undoing the past in order to lie in the present: Counterfactual thinking and deceptive communication.Raluca A. Briazu, Clare R. Walsh, Catherine Deeprose & Giorgio Ganis - 2017 - Cognition 161:66-73.details
|
|
Liberals and conservatives can show similarities in negativity bias.Mark J. Brandt, Geoffrey Wetherell & Christine Reyna - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (3):307-308.details
|
|
Pragmatic Encroachment and Epistemically Responsible Action.Kenneth Boyd - 2016 - Synthese 193 (9).details
|
|
What makes weird beliefs thrive? The epidemiology of pseudoscience.Maarten Boudry, Stefaan Blancke & Massimo Pigliucci - 2015 - Philosophical Psychology 28 (8):1177-1198.details
|
|
The Fake, the Flimsy, and the Fallacious: Demarcating Arguments in Real Life.Maarten Boudry, Fabio Paglieri & Massimo Pigliucci - 2015 - Argumentation 29 (4):10.1007/s10503-015-9359-1.details
|
|
Can evolution get us off the hook? Evaluating the ecological defence of human rationality.Maarten Boudry, Michael Vlerick & Ryan McKay - 2015 - Consciousness and Cognition 33:524-535.details
|
|
Confronting value-based argumentation frameworks with people’s assessment of argument strength.Gustavo A. Bodanza & Esteban Freidin - 2023 - Argument and Computation 14 (3):247-273.details
|
|
Modular vs. diagrammatic reasoning.Angelina Bobrova & Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen - 2022 - Pragmatics and Cognition 29 (1):111-134.details
|
|
When emotions improve reasoning: The possible roles of relevance and utility.Isabelle Blanchette & Serge Caparos - 2013 - Thinking and Reasoning 19 (3-4):399-413.details
|
|
Why Do Irrational Beliefs Mimic Science? The Cultural Evolution of Pseudoscience.Stefaan Blancke, Maarten Boudry & Massimo Pigliucci - 2016 - Theoria 83 (1):78-97.details
|
|
Science as a moral system.Stefaan Blancke - 2022 - Synthese 200 (6):1-18.details
|
|
Reasonable Irrationality: the Role of Reasons in the Diffusion of Pseudoscience.Stefaan Blancke, Maarten Boudry & Johan Braeckman - 2019 - Journal of Cognition and Culture 19 (5):432-449.details
|
|
Pseudoscience as a Negative Outcome of Scientific Dialogue: A Pragmatic-Naturalistic Approach to the Demarcation Problem.Stefaan Blancke & Maarten Boudry - 2022 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 34 (3):183-198.details
|
|
Nothing about collective irrationalities makes sense except in the light of cooperation.Stefaan Blancke - 2023 - Philosophical Psychology 36 (5):990-1010.details
|
|
In defence of epistemic vices.Steven Bland - 2022 - Synthese 200 (1):1-22.details
|
|
Cognitive bias, situationism, and virtue reliabilism.Steven Bland - 2018 - Synthese 198 (1):471-490.details
|
|
An Interactionist Approach to Cognitive Debiasing.Steven Bland - 2022 - Episteme 19 (1):66-88.details
|
|
Self-serving biases and public justifications in trust games.Cristina Bicchieri & Hugo Mercier - 2013 - Synthese 190 (5):909-922.details
|
|