Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Set Theory.Thomas Jech - 1999 - Studia Logica 63 (2):300-300.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   327 citations  
  • The lottery preparation.Joel David Hamkins - 2000 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 101 (2-3):103-146.
    The lottery preparation, a new general kind of Laver preparation, works uniformly with supercompact cardinals, strongly compact cardinals, strong cardinals, measurable cardinals, or what have you. And like the Laver preparation, the lottery preparation makes these cardinals indestructible by various kinds of further forcing. A supercompact cardinal κ, for example, becomes fully indestructible by <κ-directed closed forcing; a strong cardinal κ becomes indestructible by κ-strategically closed forcing; and a strongly compact cardinal κ becomes indestructible by, among others, the forcing to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   63 citations  
  • Tall cardinals.Joel D. Hamkins - 2009 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 55 (1):68-86.
    A cardinal κ is tall if for every ordinal θ there is an embedding j: V → M with critical point κ such that j > θ and Mκ ⊆ M. Every strong cardinal is tall and every strongly compact cardinal is tall, but measurable cardinals are not necessarily tall. It is relatively consistent, however, that the least measurable cardinal is tall. Nevertheless, the existence of a tall cardinal is equiconsistent with the existence of a strong cardinal. Any tall cardinal (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Superdestructibility: A Dual to Laver's Indestructibility.Joel David Hamkins & Saharon Shelah - 1998 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (2):549-554.
    After small forcing, any $ -closed forcing will destroy the supercompactness and even the strong compactness of κ.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • The negation of the singular cardinal hypothesis from o(K)=K++.Moti Gitik - 1989 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 43 (3):209-234.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   39 citations  
  • The negation of the singular cardinal hypothesis from< i> o(< i> K_)=< i> K< sup>++.Moti Gitik - 1989 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 43 (3):209-234.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   30 citations  
  • The strenght of the failure of the singular cardinal hypothesis.Moti Gitik - 1991 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 51 (3):215-240.
    We show that o = k++ is necessary for ¬SCH. Together with previous results it provides the exact strenght of ¬SCH.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  • (1 other version)On strong compactness and supercompactness.Telis K. Menas - 1975 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 7 (4):327.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   37 citations  
  • Identity crises and strong compactness : II. Strong cardinals.Arthur W. Apter & James Cummings - 2001 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 40 (1):25-38.
    . From a proper class of supercompact cardinals, we force and obtain a model in which the proper classes of strongly compact and strong cardinals precisely coincide. In this model, it is the case that no strongly compact cardinal \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} $\kappa$\end{document} is \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} $2^\kappa = \kappa^+$\end{document} supercompact.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  • (1 other version)How large is the first strongly compact cardinal? or a study on identity crises.Menachem Magidor - 1976 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 10 (1):33-57.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   59 citations  
  • (1 other version)On strong compactness and supercompactness.Telis K. Menas - 1975 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 7 (4):327-359.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   68 citations  
  • (1 other version)How large is the first strongly compact cardinal? or: A study on identity crises.Menachem Magidor - 1976 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 10 (1):33.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   40 citations  
  • The tree property at successors of singular cardinals.Menachem Magidor & Saharon Shelah - 1996 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 35 (5-6):385-404.
    Assuming some large cardinals, a model of ZFC is obtained in which $\aleph_{\omega+1}$ carries no Aronszajn trees. It is also shown that if $\lambda$ is a singular limit of strongly compact cardinals, then $\lambda^+$ carries no Aronszajn trees.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   38 citations