- Prejudice as the misattribution of salience.Jessie Munton - 2021 - Analytic Philosophy 64 (1):1-19.details
|
|
Inferring by Attaching Force.Ulf Hlobil - 2019 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (4):701-714.details
|
|
Inference as Consciousness of Necessity.Eric Marcus - 2020 - Analytic Philosophy 61 (4):304-322.details
|
|
Knowing a rule.Carlotta Pavese - 2015 - Philosophical Issues 25 (1):165-188.details
|
|
Lewis Carroll’s regress and the presuppositional structure of arguments.Carlotta Pavese - 2021 - Linguistics and Philosophy 45 (1):1-38.details
|
|
Rational Inference: The Lowest Bounds.Cameron Buckner - 2019 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 98 (3):697-724.details
|
|
The Hardness of the Iconic Must: Can Peirce’s Existential Graphs Assist Modal Epistemology?Catherine Legg - 2012 - Philosophia Mathematica 20 (1):1-24.details
|
|
Rational Inference: The Lowest Bounds.Cameron Buckner - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (3):1-28.details
|
|
Inferring as a way of knowing.Nicholas Koziolek - 2017 - Synthese (Suppl 7):1563-1582.details
|
|
Norms, reasons and reasoning: a guide through Lewis Carroll’s regress argument.Corine Besson - 2018 - In Daniel Star, The Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity. New York, NY, United States of America: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
Understanding, Integration, and Epistemic Value.Georgi Gardiner - 2012 - Acta Analytica 27 (2):163-181.details
|
|
The value of thinking and the normativity of logic.Manish Oza - 2020 - Philosophers' Imprint 20 (25):1-23.details
|
|
We cannot infer by accepting testimony.Ulf Hlobil - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (10):2589-2598.details
|
|
Infinite Regress Arguments.Jan Willem Wieland - 2013 - Cham: Springer.details
|
|
II—Peter Milne: What is the Normative Role of Logic?Peter Milne - 2009 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 83 (1):269-298.details
|
|
The guise of good reason.Ulf Hlobil - 2021 - Philosophical Explorations 24 (2):204-224.details
|
|
“In a certain sense we cannot make mistakes in logic”: Wittgenstein’s Anti-Psychologism and the Normativity of Logic.Gilad Nir - 2021 - Disputatio 10 (18):165-185.details
|
|
Epistemic dimensions of personhood.Simon Evnine - 2008 - New York: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
Understanding Understanding: An Epistemological Investigation.Mikael Janvid - 2014 - Philosophia 42 (4):971-985.details
|
|
Understanding the Progress of Science.C. D. McCoy - 2022 - In Insa Lawler, Kareem Khalifa & Elay Shech, Scientific Understanding and Representation: Modeling in the Physical Sciences. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 353-369.details
|
|
John Cook Wilson.Mathieu Marion - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.details
|
|
Instrumental Rationality and Carroll's Tortoise.John Brunero - 2005 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (5):557-569.details
|
|
How inference isn’t blind: Self-conscious inference and its role in doxastic agency.David Jenkins - 2019 - Dissertation, King’s College Londondetails
|
|
The universality of logic: On the connection between rationality and logical ability.Simon J. Evnine - 2001 - Mind 110 (438):335-367.details
|
|
Demonstrative Induction and the Skeleton of Inference.P. D. Magnus - 2008 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22 (3):303-315.details
|
|
Logical reasons.Pascal Engel - 2005 - Philosophical Explorations 8 (1):21 – 38.details
|
|
Dummett, Achilles and the tortoise.Pascal Engel - unknowndetails
|
|
Wittgensteinian instrumentalism.Alan Musgrave - 1980 - Theoria 46 (2-3):65-105.details
|
|
Strictures on an Exhibition.Alexander Robert Yates - 2021 - Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 9 (11).details
|
|
What The Tortoise Has To Say About Diachronic Rationality.Markos Valaris - 2016 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (S1):293-307.details
|
|
What Carroll’s Tortoise Actually Proves.Jan Willem Wieland - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (5):983-997.details
|
|
Cognitive Penetrability.Luca Moretti - 2020 - In Seemings and Epistemic Justification: how appearances justify beliefs. Cham: Springer.details
|
|
Carroll’s Regress Times Three.Gilbert Plumer - 2023 - Acta Analytica 38 (4):551-571.details
|
|
Practical Steps and Reasons for Action.Philip Clark - 1997 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 27 (1):17 - 45.details
|
|
Compressing Graphs: a Model for the Content of Understanding.Felipe Morales Carbonell - 2025 - Erkenntnis 90 (1).details
|
|
Feasible inferences.Christopher Cherniak - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (2):248-268.details
|
|
Logical Form and the Limits of Thought.Manish Oza - 2020 - Dissertation, University of Torontodetails
|
|
Achilles versus the tortoise: The battle over modus ponens (an aristotelian argument).Peter Marton - 2004 - Philosophia 31 (3-4):383-400.details
|
|
Experience and the justification of belief.Alan Millar - 1989 - Ratio 2 (2):138-152.details
|
|
Carroll’s Infinite Regress and the Act of Diagramming.John Mumma - 2019 - Topoi 38 (3):619-626.details
|
|
La logique peut-elle mouvoir l'esprit?Pascal Engel - 1998 - Dialogue 37 (1):35-54.details
|
|
Seeing and Following Some Rules.Clive Stroud-Drinkwater - 1986 - Dialectica 40 (1):3-18.details
|
|
Knowledge, Objectivity, and Self-Consciousness: A Kantian Articulation of Our Capacity to Know.Maximilian Tegtmeyer - 2022 - Dissertation, University of Pittsburghdetails
|
|
Logic, Reasoning, and Rationality.Erik Weber, Joke Meheus & Dietlinde Wouters (eds.) - 2014 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
Why Pragmatism Cannot Save Us: An Expansion of the Epistemic Regress Problem.Matthew Willis - 2023 - Dissertation, University of Cincinnatidetails
|
|
Armchair luck: Apriority, intellection and epistemic luck. [REVIEW]Nenad Miščević - 2007 - Acta Analytica 22 (1):48-73.details
|
|
Can We Infer Our Empirical Beliefs From Our Sense Experiences?Rinita Mazumdar - 1996 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherstdetails
|
|