Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The Higher Infinite.Akihiro Kanamori - 2000 - Studia Logica 65 (3):443-446.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   210 citations  
  • (1 other version)[Omnibus Review].Thomas Jech - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (1):261-262.
    Reviewed Works:John R. Steel, A. S. Kechris, D. A. Martin, Y. N. Moschovakis, Scales on $\Sigma^1_1$ Sets.Yiannis N. Moschovakis, Scales on Coinductive Sets.Donald A. Martin, John R. Steel, The Extent of Scales in $L$.John R. Steel, Scales in $L$.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   219 citations  
  • (1 other version)[Omnibus Review].Akihiro Kanamori - 1981 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 46 (4):864-866.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   71 citations  
  • (1 other version)[Omnibus Review].Kenneth Kunen - 1969 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 34 (3):515-516.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   70 citations  
  • The lottery preparation.Joel David Hamkins - 2000 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 101 (2-3):103-146.
    The lottery preparation, a new general kind of Laver preparation, works uniformly with supercompact cardinals, strongly compact cardinals, strong cardinals, measurable cardinals, or what have you. And like the Laver preparation, the lottery preparation makes these cardinals indestructible by various kinds of further forcing. A supercompact cardinal κ, for example, becomes fully indestructible by <κ-directed closed forcing; a strong cardinal κ becomes indestructible by κ-strategically closed forcing; and a strongly compact cardinal κ becomes indestructible by, among others, the forcing to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   63 citations  
  • (2 other versions)Squares, scales and stationary reflection.James Cummings, Matthew Foreman & Menachem Magidor - 2001 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 1 (01):35-98.
    Since the work of Gödel and Cohen, which showed that Hilbert's First Problem was independent of the usual assumptions of mathematics, there have been a myriad of independence results in many areas of mathematics. These results have led to the systematic study of several combinatorial principles that have proven effective at settling many of the important independent statements. Among the most prominent of these are the principles diamond and square discovered by Jensen. Simultaneously, attempts have been made to find suitable (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   104 citations  
  • Fine Structure and Class Forcing.M. C. Stanley - 2001 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 7 (4):522-525.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Set Theory: An Introduction to Independence Proofs.Kenneth Kunen - 1980 - North-Holland.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   169 citations  
  • Strongly unfoldable cardinals made indestructible.Thomas A. Johnstone - 2008 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 73 (4):1215-1248.
    I provide indestructibility results for large cardinals consistent with V = L, such as weakly compact, indescribable and strongly unfoldable cardinals. The Main Theorem shows that any strongly unfoldable cardinal κ can be made indestructible by <κ-closed. κ-proper forcing. This class of posets includes for instance all <κ-closed posets that are either κ -c.c, or ≤κ-strategically closed as well as finite iterations of such posets. Since strongly unfoldable cardinals strengthen both indescribable and weakly compact cardinals, the Main Theorem therefore makes (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Simplified morasses.Dan Velleman - 1984 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (1):257-271.
    We define a structure which is much simpler than a morass, but whose existence is equivalent to the existence of a morass.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Large cardinals and locally defined well-orders of the universe.David Asperó & Sy-David Friedman - 2009 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 157 (1):1-15.
    By forcing over a model of with a class-sized partial order preserving this theory we produce a model in which there is a locally defined well-order of the universe; that is, one whose restriction to all levels H is a well-order of H definable over the structure H, by a parameter-free formula. Further, this forcing construction preserves all supercompact cardinals as well as all instances of regular local supercompactness. It is also possible to define variants of this construction which, in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • An equiconsistency for universal indestructibility.Arthur W. Apter & Grigor Sargsyan - 2010 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 75 (1):314-322.
    We obtain an equiconsistency for a weak form of universal indestructibility for strongness. The equiconsistency is relative to a cardinal weaker in consistency strength than a Woodin cardinal. Stewart Baldwin's notion of hyperstrong cardinal. We also briefly indicate how our methods are applicable to universal indestructibility for supercompactness and strong compactness.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Morasses, diamond, and forcing.Daniel J. Velleman - 1982 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 23 (2):199.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Strong axioms of infinity and elementary embeddings.Robert M. Solovay - 1978 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 13 (1):73.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   121 citations  
  • Double helix in large large cardinals and iteration of elementary embeddings.Kentaro Sato - 2007 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 146 (2):199-236.
    We consider iterations of general elementary embeddings and, using this notion, point out helices of consistency-wise implications between large large cardinals.Up to now, large cardinal properties have been considered as properties which cannot be accessed by any weaker properties and it has been known that, with respect to this relation, they form a proper hierarchy. The helices we point out significantly change this situation: the same sequence of large cardinal properties occurs repeatedly, changing only the parameters.As results of our investigation (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Indestructible Strong Unfoldability.Joel David Hamkins & Thomas A. Johnstone - 2010 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51 (3):291-321.
    Using the lottery preparation, we prove that any strongly unfoldable cardinal $\kappa$ can be made indestructible by all.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • On certain indestructibility of strong cardinals and a question of Hajnal.Moti Gitik & Saharon Shelah - 1989 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 28 (1):35-42.
    A model in which strongness ofκ is indestructible under κ+ -weakly closed forcing notions satisfying the Prikry condition is constructed. This is applied to solve a question of Hajnal on the number of elements of {λ δ |2 δ <λ}.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   55 citations  
  • Large cardinals and gap-1 morasses.Andrew D. Brooke-Taylor & Sy-David Friedman - 2009 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 159 (1-2):71-99.
    We present a new partial order for directly forcing morasses to exist that enjoys a significant homogeneity property. We then use this forcing in a reverse Easton iteration to obtain an extension universe with morasses at every regular uncountable cardinal, while preserving all n-superstrong , hyperstrong and 1-extendible cardinals. In the latter case, a preliminary forcing to make the GCH hold is required. Our forcing yields morasses that satisfy an extra property related to the homogeneity of the partial order; we (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Strong Cardinals can be Fully Laver Indestructible.Arthur W. Apter - 2002 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 48 (4):499-507.
    We prove three theorems which show that it is relatively consistent for any strong cardinal κ to be fully Laver indestructible under κ-directed closed forcing.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Large cardinals and definable well-orders on the universe.Andrew D. Brooke-Taylor - 2009 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 74 (2):641-654.
    We use a reverse Easton forcing iteration to obtain a universe with a definable well-order, while preserving the GCH and proper classes of a variety of very large cardinals. This is achieved by coding using the principle ◊ $_{k^ - }^* $ at a proper class of cardinals k. By choosing the cardinals at which coding occurs sufficiently sparsely, we are able to lift the embeddings witnessing the large cardinal properties without having to meet any non-trivial master conditions.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • [Omnibus Review].James E. Baumgartner - 1985 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 (1):239-240.
    Reviewed Works:Edwin W. Miller, On a Property of Families of Sets.Ben Dushnik, E. W. Miller, Partially Ordered Sets.P. Erdos, Some Set-theoretical Properties of Graphs.G. Fodor, Proof of a Conjecture of P. Erdos.P. Erdos, R. Rado, A Partition Calculus in Set Theory.P. Erdos, R. Rado, Intersection Theorems for Systems of Sets.A. Hajnal, Some Results and Problems on Set Theory.P. Erdos, A. Hajnal, On a Property of Families of Sets.A. Hajnal, Proof of a Conjecture of S. Ruziewicz.P. Erdos, A. Hajnal, R. Rado, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation