- Why be rational.Niko Kolodny - 2005 - Mind 114 (455):509-563.details
|
|
Why Be Rational&quest.Niko Kolodny - 2005 - Mind 114 (455):509-563.details
|
|
The Ethics of Belief.Richard Feldman - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (3):667-695.details
|
|
The ethics of belief.Richard Feldman - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (3):667-695.details
|
|
The rationality of belief and other propositional attitudes.Thomas Kelly - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 110 (2):163-96.details
|
|
The Rationality of Belief and Some Other Propositional Attitudes.Thomas Kelly - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 110 (2):163-196.details
|
|
Authority and Estrangement: An Essay on Self-Knowledge.Richard Moran - 2001 - Princeton University Press.details
|
|
Authority and Estrangement: An Essay on Self-Knowledge.Richard Moran - 2001 - Princeton University Press.details
|
|
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.Richard E. Nisbett & Timothy D. Wilson - 1977 - Psychological Review; Psychological Review 84 (3):231.details
|
|
Précis of Authority and Estrangement: An Essay on Self‐Knowledge.Richard Moran - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (2):423-426.details
|
|
The Kantian versus Frankfurt.A. Blum - 2000 - Analysis 60 (3):287-288.details
|
|
Why believe the truth? Shah and Velleman on the aim of belief.José L. Zalabardo - 2010 - Philosophical Explorations 13 (1):1 - 21.details
|
|
Rational 'ought' implies 'can'.Ralph Wedgwood - 2013 - Philosophical Issues 23 (1):70-92.details
|
|
Two Arguments for Evidentialism.Jonathan Way - 2016 - Philosophical Quarterly 66 (265):805-818.details
|
|
Believing For a Reason.John Turri - 2011 - Erkenntnis 74 (3):383-397.details
|
|
No Norm needed: On the aim of belief.Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen - 2006 - Philosophical Quarterly 56 (225):499–516.details
|
|
Does doxastic transparency support evidentialism?Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen - 2008 - Dialectica 62 (4):541-547.details
|
|
Doxastic deliberation.Nishi Shah & J. David Velleman - 2005 - Philosophical Review 114 (4):497-534.details
|
|
A new argument for evidentialism.Nishi Shah - 2006 - Philosophical Quarterly 56 (225):481–498.details
|
|
What we owe to each other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.details
|
|
The Right and the Good.Some Problems in Ethics.W. D. Ross & H. W. B. Joseph - 1933 - Journal of Philosophy 30 (19):517-527.details
|
|
Non-Agential Permissibility In Epistemology.Luis R. G. Oliveira - 2015 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93 (2):389-394.details
|
|
Deontological evidentialism, wide-scope, and privileged values.Luis R. G. Oliveira - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (2):485-506.details
|
|
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.Richard E. Nisbett & Timothy D. Wilson - 1977 - Psychological Review 84 (3):231-59.details
|
|
The Possibility of Altruism. [REVIEW]Bernard Gert - 1972 - Journal of Philosophy 69 (12):340-344.details
|
|
The possibility of altruism.Thomas Nagel - 1970 - Oxford,: Clarendon P..details
|
|
The Possibility of Altruism.John Benson - 1972 - Philosophical Quarterly 22 (86):82-83.details
|
|
The Illusion of Exclusivity.Conor McHugh - 2013 - European Journal of Philosophy 23 (4):1117-1136.details
|
|
Against the Taking Condition.Conor McHugh & Jonathan Way - 2016 - Philosophical Issues 26 (1):314-331.details
|
|
Ethics, Inventing Right and Wrong.[author unknown] - 1977 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 43 (3):581-582.details
|
|
Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong.John Leslie Mackie - 1977 - New York: Penguin Books.details
|
|
Does 'Ought' Still Imply 'Can'?Clayton Littlejohn - 2012 - Philosophia 40 (4):821-828.details
|
|
'Ought' and Ability.P. A. Graham & Peter Graham - 2011 - Philosophical Review 120 (3):337-382.details
|
|
Fischer on Blameworthiness and “Ought” Implies “Can”.Peter A. Graham - 2011 - Social Theory and Practice 37 (1):63-80.details
|
|
Value Realism and the Internalism/Externalism Debate.Ernesto V. Garcia - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 117 (1-2):231-258.details
|
|
Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1969 - Journal of Philosophy 66 (23):829-839.details
|
|
Modest deontologism in epistemology.Richard Feldman - 2008 - Synthese 161 (3):339 - 355.details
|
|
Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong.Fred Feldman & J. L. Mackie - 1979 - Philosophical Review 88 (1):134.details
|
|
Epistemic obligations.Richard Feldman - 1988 - Philosophical Perspectives 2:235-256.details
|
|
Clifford's principle and James's options.Richard Feldman - 2006 - Social Epistemology 20 (1):19 – 33.details
|
|
In defence of instrumentalism about epistemic normativity.Christopher Cowie - 2014 - Synthese 191 (16):4003-4017.details
|
|
The Normative Evaluation of Belief and The Aspectual Classification of Belief and Knowledge Attributions.Matthew Chrisman - 2012 - Journal of Philosophy 109 (10):588-612.details
|
|
All things considered duties to believe.Anthony Robert Booth - 2012 - Synthese 187 (2):509-517.details
|
|
What is inference?Paul Boghossian - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 169 (1):1-18.details
|
|
The Kantian versus Frankfurt.Alex Blum - 2000 - Analysis 60 (3):287–288.details
|
|
Internal reasons and the ought-implies-can principle.Jonny Anomaly - 2008 - Philosophical Forum 39 (4):469-483.details
|
|
The deontological conception of epistemic justification.William P. Alston - 1988 - Philosophical Perspectives 2:257-299.details
|
|
Internal Reasons and the Obscurity of Blame.Bernard Williams - 1989 - In William J. Prior (ed.), Reason and Moral Judgment, Logos, vol. 10. Santa Clara University.details
|
|
The• Goods and the Motivation of Believing.Ward E. Jones - 2009 - In Adrian Haddock, Alan Millar & Duncan Pritchard (eds.), Epistemic Value. Oxford, GB: Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 139--62.details
|
|
Pragmatic Reasons for Belief.Andrew Reisner - 2018 - In Daniel Star (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity. New York, NY, United States of America: Oxford University Press.details
|
|