- What Should a Theory of Knowledge Do?Elijah Chudnoff - 2011 - Dialectica 65 (4):561-579.details
|
|
Change in View: Principles of Reasoning.Gilbert Harman - 1986 - Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.details
|
|
Knowledge and its limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
Thinking, Fast and Slow.Daniel Kahneman - 2011 - New York: New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.details
|
|
The philosophy of the inductive sciences, founded upon their history.William Whewell - 1967 - New York,: Johnson Reprint.details
|
|
Vagueness.Timothy Williamson - 1995 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (4):589-601.details
|
|
Précis of Vagueness.Timothy Williamson - 1997 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (4):921-928.details
|
|
Vagueness.Timothy Williamson - 1994 - New York: Routledge.details
|
|
The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, Founded upon their History.William Whewell - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 47 (1):205-225.details
|
|
What good are counterexamples?Brian Weatherson - 2003 - Philosophical Studies 115 (1):1-31.details
|
|
Many many problems.Brian Weatherson - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (213):481–501.details
|
|
Knowledge from falsehood.Ted A. Warfield - 2005 - Philosophical Perspectives 19 (1):405–416.details
|
|
Language and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language.Kenneth A. Taylor - 1990 - Philosophical Review 99 (2):260.details
|
|
Credible Worlds, Capacities and Mechanisms.Robert Sugden - 2009 - Erkenntnis 70 (1):3-27.details
|
|
Why knowledge is merely true belief.Crispin Sartwell - 1992 - Journal of Philosophy 89 (4):167-180.details
|
|
Vagueness, ignorance, and Margin for error. [REVIEW]R. M. Sainsbury - 1995 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (4):589-601.details
|
|
Review: Vagueness, Ignorance, and Margin for Error. [REVIEW]R. M. Sainsbury - 1995 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (4):589 - 601.details
|
|
The skeptic and the dogmatist.James Pryor - 2000 - Noûs 34 (4):517–549.details
|
|
David Lewis.Daniel Patrick Nolan - 2005 - Chesham: Mcgill-Queen's University Press.details
|
|
Intuitions and Experiments: A Defense of the Case Method in Epistemology.Jennifer Nagel - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (3):495-527.details
|
|
Epistemic intuitions.Jennifer Nagel - 2007 - Philosophy Compass 2 (6):792–819.details
|
|
In Defense of a Kripkean Dogma.Jonathan Ichikawa, Ishani Maitra & Brian Weatherson - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (1):56-68.details
|
|
If Folk Intuitions Vary, Then What?Edouard Machery, Ron Mallon, Shaun Nichols & Stephen P. Stich - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 86 (3):618-635.details
|
|
What puzzling Pierre does not believe.David K. Lewis - 1981 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 59 (3):283 – 289.details
|
|
The trap's dilemma.David K. Lewis - 1988 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 66 (2):220 – 223.details
|
|
Naming the colours.David Lewis - 1997 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75 (3):325-42.details
|
|
Finkish dispositions.David Kellogg Lewis - 1997 - Philosophical Quarterly 47 (187):143-158.details
|
|
Elusive knowledge.David K. Lewis - 1996 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (4):549 – 567.details
|
|
Thought.Gilbert Harman - 1973 - Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.details
|
|
Review of Gilbert Harman: Change in View: Principles of Reasoning. [REVIEW]Howard Margolis - 1986 - Ethics 99 (4):966-966.details
|
|
Discrimination and perceptual knowledge.Alvin I. Goldman - 1976 - Journal of Philosophy 73 (November):771-791.details
|
|
Experimental Semantics.Michael Devitt - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82 (2):418 - 435.details
|
|
The Modularity of Mind.Robert Cummins & Jerry Fodor - 1983 - Philosophical Review 94 (1):101.details
|
|
Thought.Gilbert Harman & Laurence BonJour - 1975 - Philosophical Review 84 (2):256.details
|
|
Causation as influence.David Lewis - 2000 - Journal of Philosophy 97 (4):182-197.details
|
|
Language and reality: an introduction to the philosophy of language.Michael Devitt & Kim Sterelny - 1999 - Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Edited by Kim Sterelny.details
|
|
Good knowledge, bad knowledge: on two dogmas of epistemology.Stephen Cade Hetherington - 2001 - New York: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
The Opacity of Mind: An Integrative Theory of Self-Knowledge.Peter Carruthers - 2011 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
Interpreting Quantum Theories: The Art of the Possible.Laura Ruetsche - 2011 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.details
|
|
David Lewis: Metaphysik Und Analyse.Wolfgang Schwarz - 2009 - Paderborn: Mentis-Verlag.details
|
|
The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology.Jerry A. Fodor - 1983 - Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.details
|
|
The Mind Doesn’T Work That Way: The Scope and Limits of Computational Psychology.Jerry A. Fodor - 2000 - MIT Press.details
|
|
The Metaphysics of the Tractatus.Peter Carruthers - 1990 - New York: Cambridge University Press.details
|
|
Knowledge and Its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Philosophy 76 (297):460-464.details
|
|
Why Knowledge Is Merely True Belief.Crispin Sartwell - 1992 - Journal of Philosophy 89 (4):167-180.details
|
|
Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge.Alvin I. Goldman - 2000 - In Sven Bernecker & Fred I. Dretske (eds.), Knowledge: Readings in Contemporary Epistemology. Oxford University Press. pp. 86-102.details
|
|
Void and Object.David K. Lewis - 2004 - In John Collins, Ned Hall & L. A. Paul (eds.), Causation and Counterfactuals. MIT Press. pp. 277-290.details
|
|
Knowledge and Its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (210):105-116.details
|
|
Elusive Knowledge.David Lewis - 1999 - In Keith DeRose & Ted A. Warfield (eds.), Skepticism: A Contemporary Reader. Oup Usa.details
|
|
Knowledge and its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 64 (1):200-201.details
|
|